Cited by 517Aging and Gerontology ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRetirement, Disability, and Employment

Doddering But Dear: Process, Content, and Function in Stereotyping of Older Persons

Cuddy, Amy J. C., Fiske, Susan T.·2002·Ageism

Abstract

about other people (Fiske 1998; Kite, Deaux, and Miele 1991). Conscious or not, noticing age drives our interactions with others. Age seems to answer: How should I address them? What are their political views? What do they know about popular culture? Will they be competent? Socially aware? How slowly should I talk? How loudly? From an individual’s perceived age, we infer social and cognitive competencies, political and religious beliefs, and physical abilities. These inferences guide how we behave and what information we seek, heed, and remember. Age is far from the only social marker that shapes our attitudes toward other people. We form opinions based on sex, race, and religion, among other social categories. But unlike these other categories, old age is one that most of us eventually join. For the most part, people do not move from one gender, racial, ethnic, or religious category to another. Moreover, stereotyping people based on their age, unlike these other groupings, goes largely unchallenged and even unnoticed in the United States. We disparage elderly people without fear of censure. Indeed, noticing a person’s age early in a social encounter is not surprising or inherently offensive. It is what we do with that information that can be destructive. As Butler (1980) notes in an edition of the Journal of Social Issues devoted to the topic, ageism, like racism and sexism, becomes institutionalized, affecting hiring decisions, medical care, and social policy. Many people a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/1157.003.0004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 517

Authors
Cuddy, A. J. C., & Fiske, S. T.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
Ageism
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2002-03-15
Pages
3-26
OpenAlex
W117978548
Cited by
517
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
FWCI
9.35
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
ageism, age stereotypes, social categorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review