Cited by 206Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentCategorization, perception, and language

Variability and Consistency in Early Language Learning: The Wordbank Project

Frank, Michael C., Braginsky, Mika, Yurovsky, Daniel, Marchman, Virginia A.·2021·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

A data-driven exploration of children's early language learning across different languages, providing an empirical reference and a new theoretical framework. This book examines variability and consistency in children's language learning across different languages and cultures, drawing on Wordbank, an open database with data from more than 75,000 children and twenty-nine languages or dialects. This big data approach makes the book the most comprehensive cross-linguistic analysis to date of early language learning. Moreover, its data-driven picture of which aspects of language learning are consistent across languages suggests constraints on the nature of children's language learning mechanisms. The book provides both a theoretical framework for scholars of language learning, language, and human cognition, and a resource for future research. Wordbank archives data from parents' reports about their children's language learning using instruments in the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI); its goal is to make CDI data available for study and analysis. After an overview of practical and theoretical issues, each of the book's empirical chapters applies a particular analysis to the Wordbank dataset, considering such topics as vocabulary size, demographic variation, syntactic and semantic categories, and the relationship between vocabulary growth and grammar. The final three chapters draw on the preceding chapters to quantify variability and consistency, consider the bird's eye view of language acquisition afforded by the data, and reflect on methodology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/11577.001.0001

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frank, M. C., Braginsky, M., Yurovsky, D., & Marchman, V. A.
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2021-03-16
OpenAlex
W3137537418
Cited by
206
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
61.67
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Funders
Climate Extremes
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
early childhood language learning, language acquisition, cross-linguistic comparison, child language acquisition, vocabulary development, syntactic categories, semantic categories, grammar learning, demographic variation, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review