Cited by 366Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentHearing Impairment and Communication

Measurement Properties of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories at Ages One and Two Years

Feldman, Heidi M, Dollaghan, Christine A, Campbell, Thomas F, Kurs-Lasky, Marcia, Janosky, Janine E, Paradise, Jack L·2000·Child Development

Abstract

In a prospective study of child development in relation to early-life otitis media, we administered the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories (CDI) to a large (N = 2,156), sociodemographically diverse sample of 1- and 2-year-old children. As a prerequisite for interpreting the CDI scores, we studied selected measurement properties of the inventories. Scores on the CDI/Words and Gestures (CDI-WG), designed for children 8 to 16 months old, and on the CDI/Words and Sentences (CDI-WS), designed for children 16 to 30 months old, increased significantly with months of age. On several scales of both CDI-WG and CDI-WS, standard deviations approximated or exceeded mean values, reflecting wide variability in results. Statistically significant differences in mean scores were found according to race, maternal education, and health insurance status as an indirect measure of income, but the directionality of differences was not consistent across inventories or across scales of the CDI-WS. Correlations between CDI-WG and CDI-WS ranged from .18 to .39. Our findings suggest that the CDI reflects the progress of language development within the age range 10 to 27 months. However, researchers and clinicians should exercise caution in using results of the CDI to identify individual children at risk for language deficits, to compare groups of children with different sociodemographic profiles, or to evaluate the effects of interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8624.00146

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feldman, H. M., Dollaghan, C. A., Campbell, T. F., Kurs-Lasky, M., Janosky, J. E., & Paradise, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health , Pittsburgh, PA
Venue
Child Development
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
310-322
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W1990219180
Cited by
364
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01hd026026-10a2)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (MCJ 429414)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 26026)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory, language development, toddlers, measurement properties, test-retest reliability, age-related changes, sociodemographic differences, language assessment
MeSH terms
Child Development, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Gestures, Humans, Infant, Language Tests, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review