Cited by 25Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The Neural Substrates of Conscious Perception without Performance Confounds

Open access
Morales, Jorge, Odegaard, Brian, Maniscalco, Brian·2022·Neuroscience and Philosophy

Abstract

How does the brain give rise to consciousness? A common approach to addressing this question in neuroscience research involves analyzing differences in neural activity in experimental conditions where consciousness of a stimulus differs. However, unless careful measures are taken, conditions that differ in awareness typically also differ in perceptual task performance, e.g. stimulus detection and discrimination. A large body of research demonstrates that task performance and awareness can dissociate, indicating that they are separate mental processes with separate underlying mechanisms. Thus, task performance looms as a potential confound in consciousness science: computational and neural processes attributed to differences in consciousness may actually be better attributed to correlated but distinct differences in task performance. Here we present an extended exploration of the issue of task performance confounds in consciousness research. We describe the approach of performance matching (i.e. creating experimental conditions that yield identical task performance yet different levels of awareness) as a solution to the problem of performance confounds, and discuss why it is not appropriate to artificially match performance by post-hoc selection of trials (e.g. analyzing correct trials only). We review a growing literature demonstrating matched-performance / different-awareness effects using a variety of experimental designs and discuss signal detection theory models that can…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/12611.003.0015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The broader argument is that evidence for GWT is confounded by differences in performance between conscious and unconscious conditions.

    “The broader argument here is that evidence for GWT is confounded by differences in performance between conscious and unconscious conditions (Morales et al. 2022).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morales, J., Odegaard, B., & Maniscalco, B.
Venue
Neuroscience and Philosophy
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2022-02-01
Pages
285-324
OpenAlex
W4226316601
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
22.03
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
conscious perception, neural correlates, visual awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review