CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AILegal and Labor Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 275 of the 275 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

We, the Data: Human Rights in the Digital Age

Open access
Wong, Wendy H.·2023·The MIT Press eBooks
DOI 10.7551/mitpress/14703.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A rallying call for extending human rights beyond our physical selves—and why we need to reboot rights in our data-intensive world. Our data-intensive world is here to stay, but does that come at the cost of our humanity in terms of autonomy, community, dignity, and equality? In We, the Data, Wendy H. Wong argues that we cannot allow that to happen. Exploring the pervasiveness of data collection and tracking, Wong reminds us that we are all stakeholders in this digital world, who are currently being left out of the most pressing conversations around technology, ethics, and policy. This book clarifies the nature of datafication and calls for an extension of human rights to recognize how data complicate what it means to safeguard and encourage human potential. As we go about our lives, we are co-creating data through what we do. We must embrace that these data are a part of who we are, Wong explains, even as current policies do not yet reflect the extent to which human experiences have changed. This means we are more than mere “subjects” or “sources” of data “by-products” that can be harvested and used by technology companies and governments. By exploring data rights, facial recognition technology, our posthumous rights, and our need for a right to data literacy, Wong has crafted a compelling case for engaging as stakeholders to hold data collectors accountable. Just as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights laid the global groundwork for human rights, We, the Data gives us a foundation upon which we claim human rights in the age of data.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/14703.001.0001

Cites

275 of 275 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–275 of 275

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • AI and memory

    Hoskins, A. (2024) · Memory, Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2024.16 · Cited by 64

    “For instance, M. Wong (2023) explains, ‘ The problem with using AI output to train future AI is straight-forward.”

See all 31

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wong, W. H.
Corresponding author
Wong, Wendy H.
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2023-10-10
DOI
10.7551/mitpress/14703.001.0001
OpenAlex
W4382600626
Semantic Scholar
98997a07f7ccd4f7b1db05a868189245c42c040f
Cited by
31
References
275
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1
FWCI
31.13
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
data rights, human rights, datafication, data collection, data tracking, data literacy, facial recognition technology, posthumous rights, digital rights, data ethics, data policy, autonomy, human dignity, Universal Declaration of Human Rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review