The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Democracy across Borders: From Dêmos to Dêmoi
Abstract
An innovative conception of democracy for an era of globalization and delegation of authority beyond the nation-state: rule by peoples across borders rather than by "the people" within a fixed jurisdiction. Today democracy is both exalted as the "best means to realize human rights" and seen as weakened because of globalization and delegation of authority beyond the nation-state. In this provocative book, James Bohman argues that democracies face a period of renewal and transformation and that democracy itself needs redefinition according to a new transnational ideal. Democracy, he writes, should be rethought in the plural; it should no longer be understood as rule by the people (dêmos), singular, with a specific territorial identification and connotation, but as rule by peoples (dêmoi), across national boundaries. Bohman shows that this new conception of transnational democracy requires reexamination of such fundamental ideas as the people, the public, citizenship, human rights, and federalism, and he argues that it offers a feasible approach to realizing democracy in a globalized world. In his account, Bohman establishes the conceptual foundations of transnational democracy by examining in detail current theories of democracy beyond the nation-state (including those proposed by Rawls, Habermas, Held, and Dryzek) and offers a deliberative alternative. He considers the importance of communicative freedom in the transnational public sphere (including networked communication over the Internet), human rights as the normative basis of transnational democracy, and the European Union as a transnational polity. Finally, he examines the relationship between peace and democracy, concluding that peace requires democratization on interacting state and suprastate levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory
Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533 · Cited by 956
A problem-based approach to democratic theory
WARREN, M. E. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055416000605 · Cited by 478
Governance-driven democratization
Warren, M. E. (2009) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460170903158040 · Cited by 403
European Demoicracy and Its Crisis
Nicolaïdis, K. (2013) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.12006 · Cited by 304
The Case for Demoicracy in the European Union*
Cheneval, F., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02262.x · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Bohman, J.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2007-04-06
- OpenAlex
- W2798517862
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.38
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Democracy across Borders: From Dêmos to Dêmoi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/2327.001.0001
- The paper
- Bohman, J. (2007). Democracy across Borders: From Dêmos to Dêmoi. The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2327.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.