The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plans for Discourse
Abstract
Abstract : Discourses are fundamentally instances of collaboration behavior. We propose a model of the collaborative plans of agents achieving joint goals and illustrate the role of these plans in discourses. Three types of collaborative plans, called Shared Plans, are formulated for joint goals requiring simultaneous, conjoined or sequential actions on the part of the agents who participate in the plans and the discourse; a fourth type of Shared Plan is presented for the circumstance where two agents communicate, but only one acts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intelligent agents: theory and practice
Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888900008122 · Cited by 6,810
Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7 · Cited by 1,699
Narrative Planning: Balancing Plot and Character
Riedl, M. O., & Young, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2989 · Cited by 522
Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead
Taboada, M., & Mann, W. C. (2006) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445606061881 · Cited by 451
Allen, J. E., Guinn, C. I., & Horvtz, E. (1999) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/5254.796083 · Cited by 442
Understanding human intentions via hidden markov models in autonomous mobile robots
Kelley, R., Tavakkoli, A., King, C., Nicolescu, M., Nicolescu, M., & Bebis, G. (2008) · Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction · doi:10.1145/1349822.1349870 · Cited by 181
Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S. (1999) · Applied Logic Series · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9204-8_10 · Cited by 177
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L.
- Venue
- Intentions in Communication
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1990-06-28
- Pages
- 417-444
- OpenAlex
- W332028463
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.52
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
