The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sex, Syntax, and Semantics
Open accessAbstract
Many languages have a grammatical gender system whereby all nouns are assigned a gender (most commonly feminine, masculine, or neuter).Two studies examined whether (1) the assignment of genders to nouns is truly arbitrary (as has been claimed), and (2) whether the grammatical genders assigned to nouns have semantic consequences.In the first study, English speakers' intuitions about the genders of animals (but not artifacts) were found to correlate with the grammatical genders assigned to the names of these objects in Spanish and German.These findings suggest that the assignment of genders to nouns is not entirely arbitrary but may to some extent reflect the perceived masculine or feminine properties of the nouns' referents.Results of the second study suggested that people's ideas about the genders of objects are strongly influenced by the grammatical genders assigned to these objects in their native language.Spanish and German speakers' memory for object--name pairs (e.g., apple--Patricia) was better for pairs where the gender of the proper name was congruent with the grammatical gender of the object name (in their native language), than when the two genders were incongruent.This was true even though both groups performed the task in English.These results suggest that grammatical gender may not be as arbitrary or as purely grammatical as was previously thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774
Can language restructure cognition? The case for space
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Levinson, S. C. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003 · Cited by 872
The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.001.0001 · Cited by 639
The Cartography of Syntactic Structures
Cinque, G., & Rizzi, L. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0003 · Cited by 639
Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research
Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx104 · Cited by 636
Metadata
- Authors
- Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W.
- Venue
- Language in Mind
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2003-03-14
- Pages
- 61-80
- OpenAlex
- W1602567378
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.98
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex, Syntax, and Semantics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/4117.003.0010
- The paper
- Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, Syntax, and Semantics. Language in Mind. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4117.003.0010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.