Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction
Abstract
A study of the impact of Internet use on American society, based on a series of nationally representative surveys conducted from 1995 to 2000. Drawing on nationally representative telephone surveys conducted from 1995 to 2000, James Katz and Ronald Rice offer a rich and nuanced picture of Internet use in America. Using quantitative data, as well as case studies of Web sites, they explore the impact of the Internet on society from three perspectives: access to Internet technology (the digital divide), involvement with groups and communities through the Internet (social capital), and use of the Internet for social interaction and expression (identity). To provide a more comprehensive account of Internet use, the authors draw comparisons across media and include Internet nonusers and former users in their research. The authors call their research the Syntopia Project to convey the Internet's role as one among a host of communication technologies as well as the synergy between people's online activities and their real-world lives. Their major finding is that Americans use the Internet as an extension and enhancement of their daily routines. Contrary to media sensationalism, the Internet is neither a utopia, liberating people to form a global egalitarian community, nor a dystopia-producing armies of disembodied, lonely individuals. Like any form of communication, it is as helpful or harmful as those who use it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Greater initial socioeconomic status is associated with earlier and greater access to technology.
“Those with greater initial SES are more likely to have earlier and greater access (Katz and Rice, 2002)”
From College students’ literacy, ChatGPT activities, educational outcomes, and trust from a digital divide perspective (2026) · cites this paper as Katz and Rice, 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The digital divide shifts to differences in usage
van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444813487959 · Cited by 1,733 · see citing works
The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors
Friemel, T. N. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814538648 · Cited by 1,136 · see citing works
The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015) · Communication and Information Technologies Annual · doi:10.1108/s2050-206020150000010002 · Cited by 1,022 · see citing works
Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts
Rice, R. E., & Katz, J. E. (2003) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/s0308-5961(03)00068-5 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Self-citationAdolescents’ identity experiments on the internet
Valkenburg, P. M., Schouten, A. P., & Peter, J. (2005) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444805052282 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Effects of Internet use and social resources on changes in depression
Bessière, K., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., & Boneva, B. S. (2008) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/13691180701858851 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Effects of internet use on health and depression: a longitudinal study
Bessière, K., Pressman, S., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1149 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Defining E‐leadership as Competence in ICT‐Mediated Communications: An Exploratory Assessment
Roman, A. V., Van Wart, M., Wang, X., Liu, C., Kim, S., & McCarthy, A. (2019) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12980 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Hart, A., Henwood, F., & Wyatt, S. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e36 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Campos-Castillo, C. (2015) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439314547617 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Zhang, C. (., Rice, R. E., & Wang, L. H. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241301741 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Much different from the utopian view of technology being an automatic force for democracy and equality (critiqued by Katz and Rice, 2002 syntopian perspective) and digital saturation (Norris, 2001), digital divide research suggests that technology can amplify underlying human and institutional…”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2002-08-30
- OpenAlex
- W2099758956
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- internet use, social impact of the Internet, digital divide, social capital, online communities, online identity, social interaction, media comparison, American society
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review