The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis
Abstract
A conceptual and analytical framework for understanding economic institutions and institutional change. Markets are one of the most salient institutions produced by humans, and economists have traditionally analyzed the workings of the market mechanism. Recently, however, economists and others have begun to appreciate the many institution-related events and phenomena that have a significant impact on economic performance. Examples include the demise of the communist states, the emergence of Silicon Valley and e-commerce, the European currency unification, and the East Asian financial crises. In this book Masahiko Aoki uses modern game theory to develop a conceptual and analytical framework for understanding issues related to economic institutions. The wide-ranging discussion considers how institutions evolve, why their overall arrangements are robust and diverse across economies, and why they do or do not change in response to environmental factors such as technological progress, global market integration, and demographic change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The functioning of complex institutions is highly dependent on tacit knowledge (Aoki 2001).”
From Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: a sketch of the evidence. (2016) · cites this paper as Aoki 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thelen, K. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790997 · Cited by 2,550
Hodgson, G. M. (2006) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879 · Cited by 2,320
Explaining Institutional Change
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806414 · Cited by 2,102
The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants
Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196772 · Cited by 2,216
Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture
Talhelm, T., Zhang, X., Oishi, S., Shimin, C., Duan, D., Lan, X., & Kitayama, S. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246850 · Cited by 1,374
Metadata
- Authors
- Aoki, M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aoki, Masahiko
- ORCID
- Aoki, Masahiko
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2001-11-09
- OpenAlex
- W3143200038
- Cited by
- 1,480
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 104 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 63
- FWCI
- 42.50
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Social Sciences › Development › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- economic institutions, institutional change, comparative institutional analysis, market mechanisms, game theory, institutional robustness, institutional diversity, technological progress, international market integration, demographic change, post-communist transition, e-commerce
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review