The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Internet Filtering: The Politics and Mechanisms of Control
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authoritarian governments systematically censor information and communication they deem to be critical.
“Several studies have found that authoritarian governments systematically censor information and communication they deem to be critical.”
From How Dictators Control the Internet: A Review Essay (2020) · cites this paper as Zittrain & Palfrey, 2008
The network layer provides tools such as filtering mechanisms based on critical keywords or senders/receivers of data packets.
“To do so, the network layer provides various tools such as filtering mechanisms based on critical keywords or senders/receivers of data packets (Hellmeier, 2016; Murdoch & Anderson, 2008; Zittrain & Palfrey, 2008).”
From How Dictators Control the Internet: A Review Essay (2020) · cites this paper as Zittrain & Palfrey, 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Dictators Control the Internet: A Review Essay
Keremoğlu, E., & Weidmann, N. B. (2020) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414020912278 · Cited by 131
The Dictator's Digital Toolkit: Explaining Variation in Internet Filtering in Authoritarian Regimes
Hellmeier, S. (2016) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12189 · Cited by 69
“I know it's sensitive”: Internet censorship, recoding, and the sensitive word culture in China
Ye, W., & Zhao, L. (2023) · Discourse, Context & Media · doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100666 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Zittrain, J., & Palfrey, J.
- Venue
- Access Denied
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2008-01-25
- Pages
- 29-56
- OpenAlex
- W6806902
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 52.49
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- internet filtering, censorship, internet governance, online content regulation, surveillance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
