The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age
Open accessAbstract
Center for Communication and Civic EngagementDemocracy is not a sure thing.Governments and party systems often strain against changes in societies, and some fall prey to corruption and bad policies.Under the right conditions, people may reassert their rights to govern, and produce remarkable periods of creative reform, realignment, and change.In these times, politics becomes a focus of personal life itself, restoring the sense that participation makes a difference.The challenges of influencing the course of nations and addressing global issues may inspire creative solutions from the generations of young citizens who have access to digital communication tools.The cascading advance of media platforms and social software enables unprecedented levels of production and distribution of ideas, public deliberation, and network organization.It is clear that many young citizens of this digital and global age have demonstrated interests in making contributions to society.Yet the challenge of engaging effectively with politics that are linked to spheres of government remains, for most, a daunting prospect.The reasons are numerous.A casual look at world democracies suggests that many of the most established ones are showing signs of wear.Parties are trying to reinvent themselves while awkwardly staying the course that keeps them in power.In the press, in everyday conversation, and often from the mouths of politicians, politics has become a dirty word rather than a commonly accepted vocabulary for personal expression. 1 Perhaps most notably, younger generations have disconnected from conventional politics and government in alarming numbers.These trends in youth dissatisfaction with conventional political engagement are not just occurring in the United States, but have parallels in other democracies as well, including Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. 2 The pathways to disconnection from government are many: adults are frequently negative about politics, the tone of the press is often cynical, candidates seldom appeal directly to young voters on their own terms about their concerns, politicians have poisoned the public well (particularly in the United States) with vitriol and negative campaigning, and young people see the media filled with inauthentic performances from officials who are staged by professional communication managers.3 Paralleling these developments has been a notable turning away from public life into online friendship networks, gaming and entertainment environments, and consumerThe author would like to thank Peter Levine, Alan Schussman, Cathy Davidson, and Chris Wells for their helpful comments on this chapter.In addition, the lively discussions both on-and offline among all the authors in this volume have informed and changed my thinking on many aspects of citizenship and digital learning.The online discussions with an impressive group of participants further added to the intellectual stimulation of this project.Thanks to everyone who so generously shared their time and creative spirits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-0999 · Cited by 1,903
Cited by
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x · Cited by 1,821
Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review
Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D., & Pang, N. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815616221 · Cited by 429
Digital Rights, Digital Citizenship and Digital Literacy: What’s the Difference?
Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J. (2021) · Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research · doi:10.7821/naer.2021.1.616 · Cited by 284
Oser, J. (2017) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1364-8 · Cited by 75
Buying In to Social Change: How Private Consumption Choices Engender Concern for the Collective
Atkinson, L. (2012) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716212448366 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, W. L.
- Venue
- Civic Life Online
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2007-11-30
- Pages
- 1-24
- OpenAlex
- W2408573612
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 72.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/7893.003.0002
- The paper
- Bennett, W. L. (2007). Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. Civic Life Online. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7893.003.0002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.