Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age

Open access
Bennett, W. Lance·2007·Civic Life Online

Abstract

Center for Communication and Civic EngagementDemocracy is not a sure thing.Governments and party systems often strain against changes in societies, and some fall prey to corruption and bad policies.Under the right conditions, people may reassert their rights to govern, and produce remarkable periods of creative reform, realignment, and change.In these times, politics becomes a focus of personal life itself, restoring the sense that participation makes a difference.The challenges of influencing the course of nations and addressing global issues may inspire creative solutions from the generations of young citizens who have access to digital communication tools.The cascading advance of media platforms and social software enables unprecedented levels of production and distribution of ideas, public deliberation, and network organization.It is clear that many young citizens of this digital and global age have demonstrated interests in making contributions to society.Yet the challenge of engaging effectively with politics that are linked to spheres of government remains, for most, a daunting prospect.The reasons are numerous.A casual look at world democracies suggests that many of the most established ones are showing signs of wear.Parties are trying to reinvent themselves while awkwardly staying the course that keeps them in power.In the press, in everyday conversation, and often from the mouths of politicians, politics has become a dirty word rather than a commonly accepted vocabulary for personal expression. 1 Perhaps most notably, younger generations have disconnected from conventional politics and government in alarming numbers.These trends in youth dissatisfaction with conventional political engagement are not just occurring in the United States, but have parallels in other democracies as well, including Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. 2 The pathways to disconnection from government are many: adults are frequently negative about politics, the tone of the press is often cynical, candidates seldom appeal directly to young voters on their own terms about their concerns, politicians have poisoned the public well (particularly in the United States) with vitriol and negative campaigning, and young people see the media filled with inauthentic performances from officials who are staged by professional communication managers.3 Paralleling these developments has been a notable turning away from public life into online friendship networks, gaming and entertainment environments, and consumerThe author would like to thank Peter Levine, Alan Schussman, Cathy Davidson, and Chris Wells for their helpful comments on this chapter.In addition, the lively discussions both on-and offline among all the authors in this volume have informed and changed my thinking on many aspects of citizenship and digital learning.The online discussions with an impressive group of participants further added to the intellectual stimulation of this project.Thanks to everyone who so generously shared their time and creative spirits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/7893.003.0002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 452

Metadata

Authors
Bennett, W. L.
Venue
Civic Life Online
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2007-11-30
Pages
1-24
OpenAlex
W2408573612
Cited by
452
References
1
FWCI
72.66
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/7893.003.0002
The paper
Bennett, W. L. (2007). Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. Civic Life Online. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7893.003.0002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.