The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital Methods
Abstract
A proposal to repurpose Web-native techniques for use in social and cultural scholarly research. In Digital Methods, Richard Rogers proposes a methodological outlook for social and cultural scholarly research on the Web that seeks to move Internet research beyond the study of online culture. It is not a toolkit for Internet research, or operating instructions for a software package; it deals with broader questions. How can we study social media to learn something about society rather than about social media use? Rogers proposes repurposing Web-native techniques for research into cultural change and societal conditions. We can learn to reapply such “methods of the medium” as crawling and crowd sourcing, PageRank and similar algorithms, tag clouds and other visualizations; we can learn how they handle hits, likes, tags, date stamps, and other Web-native objects. By “thinking along” with devices and the objects they handle, digital research methods can follow the evolving methods of the medium. Rogers uses this new methodological outlook to examine such topics as the findings of inquiries into 9/11 search results, the recognition of climate change skeptics by climate-change-related Web sites, and the censorship of the Iranian Web. With Digital Methods, Rogers introduces a new vision and method for Internet research and at the same time applies them to the Web's objects of study, from tiny particles (hyperlinks) to large masses (social media).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291170 · Cited by 7,330
Cited by
The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816675438 · Cited by 1,047
The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812472322 · Cited by 871
Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016) · Communication Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332 · Cited by 542
Dragiewicz, M., Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Salter, M., Suzor, N. P., Woodlock, D., & Harris, B. (2018) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341 · Cited by 282
Programmed method: developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets
Borra, E., & Rieder, B. (2014) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-09-2013-0094 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, R.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2013-05-10
- OpenAlex
- W4241186906
- Cited by
- 746
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 129.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/8718.001.0001
- The paper
- Rogers, R. (2013). Digital Methods. The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8718.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.