Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,047

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps

Open access
Light, Ben, Burgess, Jean, Duguay, Stefanie·2018·New Media & Society

Abstract

Software applications (apps) are now prevalent in the digital media environment. They are the site of significant sociocultural and economic transformations across many domains, from health and relationships to entertainment and everyday finance. As relatively closed technical systems, apps pose new methodological challenges for sociocultural digital media research. This article describes a method, grounded in a combination of science and technology studies with cultural studies, through which researchers can perform a critical analysis of a given app. The method involves establishing an app’s environment of expected use by identifying and describing its vision, operating model and modes of governance. It then deploys a walkthrough technique to systematically and forensically step through the various stages of app registration and entry, everyday use and discontinuation of use. The walkthrough method establishes a foundational corpus of data upon which can be built a more detailed analysis of an app’s intended purpose, embedded cultural meanings and implied ideal users and uses. The walkthrough also serves as a foundation for further user-centred research that can identify how users resist these arrangements and appropriate app technology for their own purposes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1461444816675438

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bartky SL, 2003, The Politics of Women’s Bodies, 25
  2. Berry DM, 2011, Culture Machine, 12, 1
  3. Burgess J, 2012, Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone, 28
  4. Jørgensen KM, 2016, Journal of Media and Communication Research, 60, 32
  5. Karppi T (2011) Digital suicide and the biopolitics of leaving Facebook. Transformations: Journal of Media and Culture 20. Available at: http://transformationsjournal.org/journal/issue_20/article_02.shtml
  6. 10.1080/10528008.2015.999586 · doi:10.1080/10528008.2015.999586
  7. 10.4324/9781315636801-14 · doi:10.4324/9781315636801-14
  8. 10.1108/09593841011087770 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/1461444811410400 · doi:10.1177/1461444811410400
  10. 10.1177/1367877908096004 · doi:10.1177/1367877908096004
  11. Sandvig C, 2014, Data and Discrimination: Collected Essays, 6
  12. 10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_49 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_49

Metadata

Authors
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S.
Venue
New Media & Society
Published
2016-11-11
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
881-900
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
OpenAlex
W2553850813
Cited by
1,047
References
54
FWCI
21.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1461444816675438
The paper
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.