The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps
Open accessAbstract
Software applications (apps) are now prevalent in the digital media environment. They are the site of significant sociocultural and economic transformations across many domains, from health and relationships to entertainment and everyday finance. As relatively closed technical systems, apps pose new methodological challenges for sociocultural digital media research. This article describes a method, grounded in a combination of science and technology studies with cultural studies, through which researchers can perform a critical analysis of a given app. The method involves establishing an app’s environment of expected use by identifying and describing its vision, operating model and modes of governance. It then deploys a walkthrough technique to systematically and forensically step through the various stages of app registration and entry, everyday use and discontinuation of use. The walkthrough method establishes a foundational corpus of data upon which can be built a more detailed analysis of an app’s intended purpose, embedded cultural meanings and implied ideal users and uses. The walkthrough also serves as a foundation for further user-centred research that can identify how users resist these arrangements and appropriate app technology for their own purposes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory
Latour, B. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · Cited by 16,778
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Software engineering: A practitioner's approach
(1983) · Advances in Engineering Software (1978) · doi:10.1016/0141-1195(83)90118-3 · Cited by 8,234
The Ethnography of Infrastructure
STAR, S. L. (1999) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027649921955326 · Cited by 4,486
The Psychology of Everyday Things
Massaro, D. W., & Norman, D. A. (1990) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423268 · Cited by 3,466
Gummett, P. (1988) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/39/8/019 · Cited by 2,974
The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media
van Dijck, J. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001 · Cited by 2,688
Television: Technology and Cultural Form
Williams, R. (1974) · Saber7 UCAB · Cited by 2,353
The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-6579 · Cited by 2,140
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Bartky SL, 2003, The Politics of Women’s Bodies, 25
- Berry DM, 2011, Culture Machine, 12, 1
- Burgess J, 2012, Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone, 28
- Jørgensen KM, 2016, Journal of Media and Communication Research, 60, 32
- Karppi T (2011) Digital suicide and the biopolitics of leaving Facebook. Transformations: Journal of Media and Culture 20. Available at: http://transformationsjournal.org/journal/issue_20/article_02.shtml
- 10.1080/10528008.2015.999586 · doi:10.1080/10528008.2015.999586
- 10.4324/9781315636801-14 · doi:10.4324/9781315636801-14
- 10.1108/09593841011087770 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444811410400 · doi:10.1177/1461444811410400
- 10.1177/1367877908096004 · doi:10.1177/1367877908096004
- Sandvig C, 2014, Data and Discrimination: Collected Essays, 6
- 10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_49 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_49
Cited by
Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours
Abidin, C. (2020) · Cultural Science Journal · doi:10.5334/csci.140 · Cited by 564
Kaye, D. B. V., Chen, X., & Zeng, J. (2021) · Mobile Media & Communication · doi:10.1177/2050157920952120 · Cited by 500
Why’s Everyone on TikTok Now? The Algorithmized Self and the Future of Self-Making on Social Media
Bhandari, A., & Bimo, S. (2022) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051221086241 · Cited by 491
Digital inequalities in the age of artificial intelligence and big data
Lutz, C. (2019) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.140 · Cited by 411
Swart, J. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211008828 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S.
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-11-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 881-900
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W2553850813
- Cited by
- 1,047
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 21.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1461444816675438
- The paper
- Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.