Cited by 138Cybernetics and Technology in SocietyCultural Studies and PostmodernismMedia and Digital Communication

Networked Affect

·2015·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

Investigations of affective experiences that emerge in online settings that range from Facebook discussion forums to “smart” classrooms. Our encounters with websites, avatars, videos, mobile apps, discussion forums, GIFs, and nonhuman intelligent agents allow us to experience sensations of connectivity, interest, desire, and attachment—as well as detachment, boredom, fear, and shame. Some affective online encounters may arouse complex, contradictory feelings that resist dualistic distinctions. In this book, leading scholars examine the fluctuating and altering dynamics of affect that give shape to online connections and disconnections. Doing so, they tie issues of circulation and connectivity to theorizations of networked affect. Their diverse investigations—considering subjects that range from online sexual dynamics to the liveliness of computer code—demonstrate the value of affect theories for Internet studies. The contributors investigate networked affect in terms of intensity, sensation, and value. They explore online intensities that range from Tumblr practices in LGBTQ communities to visceral reactions to animated avatars; examine the affective materiality of software in such platforms as steampunk culture and nonprofit altporn; and analyze the ascription of value to online activities including the GTD (“getting things done”) movement and the accumulation of personal digital materials. Contributors James Ash, Alex Cho, Jodi Dean, Melissa Gregg, Ken Hillis, Kylie Jarrett, Tero Karppi, Stephen Maddison, Susanna Paasonen, Jussi Parikka, Michael Petit, Jennifer Pybus, Jenny Sundén, Veronika Tzankova

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/9715.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online, affections are embodied in a set of signs that contribute to the constitution of an affecting public and affected networks.

    “Online, these affections are embodied in a set of signs that contribute to the constitution of an affecting public and affected networks (Hillis, Paasonen, & Petit, 2015).”

    From Beyond Verification| Inauthentic Authenticity: Astroturfing to Generate True Affect Using Fakery (2026) · cites this paper as Hillis, Paasonen, & Petit, 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2015-02-27
OpenAlex
W4251905478
Cited by
138
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
17.32
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
affect theory, internet access, avatars, animated avatars, Tumblr, LGBTQ+ people

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review