The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty
Abstract
A comprehensive political and design theory of planetary-scale computation proposing that The Stack—an accidental megastructure—is both a technological apparatus and a model for a new geopolitical architecture. What has planetary-scale computation done to our geopolitical realities? It takes different forms at different scales—from energy and mineral sourcing and subterranean cloud infrastructure to urban software and massive universal addressing systems; from interfaces drawn by the augmentation of the hand and eye to users identified by self—quantification and the arrival of legions of sensors, algorithms, and robots. Together, how do these distort and deform modern political geographies and produce new territories in their own image? In The Stack, Benjamin Bratton proposes that these different genres of computation—smart grids, cloud platforms, mobile apps, smart cities, the Internet of Things, automation—can be seen not as so many species evolving on their own, but as forming a coherent whole: an accidental megastructure called The Stack that is both a computational apparatus and a new governing architecture. We are inside The Stack and it is inside of us. In an account that is both theoretical and technical, drawing on political philosophy, architectural theory, and software studies, Bratton explores six layers of The Stack: Earth, Cloud, City, Address, Interface, User. Each is mapped on its own terms and understood as a component within the larger whole built from hard…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of digital infrastructure, hardware, and software is usefully conceived as a 'stack'.
“The combination of these components is usefully conceived as a 'stack' (Bratton 2016), and since they extend across national borders and draw together many firms, they pose significant regulatory challenges.”
From The Second Cold War: US-China Competition for Centrality in Infrastructure, Digital, Production, and Finance Networks (2024) · cites this paper as Bratton 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schindler, S., Alami, I., DiCarlo, J., Jepson, N., Rolf, S., Bayırbağ, M. K., Cyuzuzo, L., DeBoom, M., Farahani, A. F., Liu, I. T., et al. (2024) · Geopolitics · doi:10.1080/14650045.2023.2253432 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Being a Deliveroo Rider: Practices of Platform Labor in Nijmegen and Berlin
Timko, P., & van Melik, R. (2021) · Journal of Contemporary Ethnography · doi:10.1177/0891241621994670 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Immaterial engagement: human agency and the cognitive ecology of the internet
Clowes, R. W. (2019) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-018-9560-4 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Toward a Participatory Digital Ethnography of Blockchain Governance
Rennie, E., Zargham, M., Tan, J., Miller, L., Abbott, J., Nabben, K., & De Filippi, P. (2022) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10778004221097056 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Red territory: forging infrastructural power
Munn, L. (2023) · Territory, Politics, Governance · doi:10.1080/21622671.2020.1805353 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Hostile interaction design: AI, governance, and the quest for human oversight
Foth, M. (2026) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03065-y · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bratton, B. H.
- Corresponding author
- Bratton, Benjamin H.
- ORCID
- Bratton, Benjamin H.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2016-02-19
- OpenAlex
- W4230627604
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 93 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 26.35
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture and Computational Design
- Keywords
- geopolitics, infrastructure, cloud computing, smart cities, Internet of Things, smart grid, self-quantification, ubiquitous computing, protocol stack, territoriality, software studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review