Cited by 101Tactile and Sensory InteractionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsInfant Health and Development

Touch

Field, Tiffany·2014·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

Why we need a daily dose of touch: an investigation of the effects of touch on our physical and mental well-being. Although the therapeutic benefits of touch have become increasingly clear, American society, claims Tiffany Field, is dangerously touch-deprived. Many schools have “no touch” policies; the isolating effects of Internet-driven work and life can leave us hungry for tactile experience. In this book Field explains why we may need a daily dose of touch. The first sensory input in life comes from the sense of touch while a baby is still in the womb, and touch continues to be the primary means of learning about the world throughout infancy and well into childhood. Touch is critical, too, for adults' physical and mental health. Field describes studies showing that touch therapy can benefit everyone, from premature infants to children with asthma to patients with conditions that range from cancer to eating disorders. This second edition of Touch, revised and updated with the latest research, reports on new studies that show the role of touch in early development, in communication (including the reading of others' emotions), in personal relationships, and even in sports. It describes the physiological and biological effects of touch, including areas of the brain affected by touch, and the effects of massage therapy on prematurity, attentiveness, depression, pain, and immune functions. Touch has been shown to have positive effects on growth, brain waves, breathing, and heart rate, and to decrease stress and anxiety. As Field makes clear, we enforce our society's touch taboo at our peril. Bradford Books imprint

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/9959.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As the child develops, positive touch experiences such as hugs, back rubs, and other forms of affectionate touch continue to facilitate the release of oxytocin.

    “As the child develops, positive touch experiences such as hugs, back rubs, and other forms of affectionate touch continue to facilitate the release of oxytocin (Field, 2014).”

    From The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development (2023) · cites this paper as Field (2014)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Field, T.
Corresponding author
Field, Tiffany
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2014-10-10
OpenAlex
W4233908489
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
touch, haptic perception, touch therapy, early development, emotion recognition, interpersonal relationships, athletic performance, massage, preterm birth, stress reduction, anxiety, pain, immune function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review