Touch
Abstract
Why we need a daily dose of touch: an investigation of the effects of touch on our physical and mental well-being. Although the therapeutic benefits of touch have become increasingly clear, American society, claims Tiffany Field, is dangerously touch-deprived. Many schools have “no touch” policies; the isolating effects of Internet-driven work and life can leave us hungry for tactile experience. In this book Field explains why we may need a daily dose of touch. The first sensory input in life comes from the sense of touch while a baby is still in the womb, and touch continues to be the primary means of learning about the world throughout infancy and well into childhood. Touch is critical, too, for adults' physical and mental health. Field describes studies showing that touch therapy can benefit everyone, from premature infants to children with asthma to patients with conditions that range from cancer to eating disorders. This second edition of Touch, revised and updated with the latest research, reports on new studies that show the role of touch in early development, in communication (including the reading of others' emotions), in personal relationships, and even in sports. It describes the physiological and biological effects of touch, including areas of the brain affected by touch, and the effects of massage therapy on prematurity, attentiveness, depression, pain, and immune functions. Touch has been shown to have positive effects on growth, brain waves, breathing, and heart rate, and to decrease stress and anxiety. As Field makes clear, we enforce our society's touch taboo at our peril. Bradford Books imprint
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As the child develops, positive touch experiences such as hugs, back rubs, and other forms of affectionate touch continue to facilitate the release of oxytocin.
“As the child develops, positive touch experiences such as hugs, back rubs, and other forms of affectionate touch continue to facilitate the release of oxytocin (Field, 2014).”
From The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development (2023) · cites this paper as Field (2014)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development
Tarsha, M. S., & Narvaez, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1113944 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Touch matters: COVID-19, physical examination, and 21st century general practice
de Zulueta, P. (2020) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp20x713705 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Discomfort and avoidance of touch: new insights on the emotional deficits of social anxiety
Kashdan, T. B., Doorley, J., Stiksma, M. C., & Hertenstein, M. J. (2017) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1256867 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Field, T.
- Corresponding author
- Field, Tiffany
- ORCID
- Field, Tiffany
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2014-10-10
- OpenAlex
- W4233908489
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
- Keywords
- touch, haptic perception, touch therapy, early development, emotion recognition, interpersonal relationships, athletic performance, massage, preterm birth, stress reduction, anxiety, pain, immune function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review