Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A genome-wide resource for the analysis of protein localisation in Drosophila

Open access
Sarov, Mihail, Barz, Christiane, Jambor, Helena, Hein, Marco Y, Schmied, Christopher, Suchold, Dana, Stender, Bettina, Janosch, Stephan, KJ, Vinay Vikas, Krishnan, RT, Krishnamoorthy, Aishwarya, Ferreira, Irene RS, Ejsmont, Radoslaw K, Finkl, Katja, Hasse, Susanne, Kämpfer, Philipp, Plewka, Nicole, Vinis, Elisabeth, Schloissnig, Siegfried, Knust, Elisabeth, Hartenstein, Volker, Mann, Matthias, Ramaswami, Mani, VijayRaghavan, K, Tomancak, Pavel, Schnorrer, Frank·2016·eLife

Abstract

The Drosophila genome contains >13000 protein-coding genes, the majority of which remain poorly investigated. Important reasons include the lack of antibodies or reporter constructs to visualise these proteins. Here, we present a genome-wide fosmid library of 10000 GFP-tagged clones, comprising tagged genes and most of their regulatory information. For 880 tagged proteins, we created transgenic lines, and for a total of 207 lines, we assessed protein expression and localisation in ovaries, embryos, pupae or adults by stainings and live imaging approaches. Importantly, we visualised many proteins at endogenous expression levels and found a large fraction of them localising to subcellular compartments. By applying genetic complementation tests, we estimate that about two-thirds of the tagged proteins are functional. Moreover, these tagged proteins enable interaction proteomics from developing pupae and adult flies. Taken together, this resource will boost systematic analysis of protein expression and localisation in various cellular and developmental contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.12068

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 114 references

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Sarov, M., Barz, C., Jambor, H., Hein, M. Y., Schmied, C., Suchold, D., Stender, B., Janosch, S., KJ, V. V., Krishnan, R., Krishnamoorthy, A., Ferreira, I. R., Ejsmont, R. K., Finkl, K., Hasse, S., Kämpfer, P., Plewka, N., Vinis, E., Schloissnig, S., Knust, E., Hartenstein, V., Mann, M., Ramaswami, M., VijayRaghavan, K., Tomancak, P., & Schnorrer, F.
Venue
eLife
Published
2016-02-20
Volume
5
Pages
e12068-e12068
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2203265148
Cited by
359
References
114
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A genome-wide resource for the analysis of protein localisation in Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7554/elife.12068
The paper
Sarov, M., Barz, C., Jambor, H., Hein, M. Y., Schmied, C., Suchold, D., Stender, B., Janosch, S., KJ, V. V., Krishnan, R., Krishnamoorthy, A., Ferreira, I. R., Ejsmont, R. K., Finkl, K., Hasse, S., Kämpfer, P., Plewka, N., Vinis, E., Schloissnig, S., . . . Schnorrer, F. (2016). A genome-wide resource for the analysis of protein localisation in Drosophila. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.12068

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.