Cited by 100Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Recruitment of inhibition and excitation across mouse visual cortex depends on the hierarchy of interconnecting areas

Open access
D'Souza, Rinaldo David, Meier, Andrew Max, Bista, Pawan, Wang, Quanxin, Burkhalter, Andreas·2016·eLife

Abstract

Diverse features of sensory stimuli are selectively processed in distinct brain areas. The relative recruitment of inhibitory and excitatory neurons within an area controls the gain of neurons for appropriate stimulus coding. We examined how such a balance of inhibition and excitation is differentially recruited across multiple levels of a cortical hierarchy by mapping the locations and strengths of synaptic inputs to pyramidal and parvalbumin (PV)-expressing neurons in feedforward and feedback pathways interconnecting primary (V1) and two higher visual areas. While interareal excitation was stronger in PV than in pyramidal neurons in all layer 2/3 pathways, we observed a gradual scaling down of the inhibition/excitation ratio from the most feedforward to the most feedback pathway. Our results indicate that interareal gain control depends on the hierarchical position of the source and the target, the direction of information flow through the network, and the laminar location of target neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.19332

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 100

Authors
D'Souza, R. D., Meier, A. M., Bista, P., Wang, Q., & Burkhalter, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
Corresponding author
Burkhalter, Andreas
Venue
eLife
Published
2016-09-26
Volume
5
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2524712153
Cited by
100
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (R01 EY016184, R01 EY022090)
  • McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
visual cortex, cortical hierarchy, parvalbumin interneurons, pyramidal neurons, feedback pathways, feedforward pathways, gain control, layer 2/3, primary visual cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Neural Inhibition, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Visual Cortex, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review