Recruitment of inhibition and excitation across mouse visual cortex depends on the hierarchy of interconnecting areas
Open accessAbstract
Diverse features of sensory stimuli are selectively processed in distinct brain areas. The relative recruitment of inhibitory and excitatory neurons within an area controls the gain of neurons for appropriate stimulus coding. We examined how such a balance of inhibition and excitation is differentially recruited across multiple levels of a cortical hierarchy by mapping the locations and strengths of synaptic inputs to pyramidal and parvalbumin (PV)-expressing neurons in feedforward and feedback pathways interconnecting primary (V1) and two higher visual areas. While interareal excitation was stronger in PV than in pyramidal neurons in all layer 2/3 pathways, we observed a gradual scaling down of the inhibition/excitation ratio from the most feedforward to the most feedback pathway. Our results indicate that interareal gain control depends on the hierarchical position of the source and the target, the direction of information flow through the network, and the laminar location of target neurons.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The diversity in interareal axon-projection patterns of glutamatergic neurons forms the structural basis of the hierarchical network.
“their tremendous diversity in interareal axon-projection patterns forms the structural basis of the hierarchical network”
From A taxonomy of transcriptomic cell types across the isocortex and hippocampal formation (2021) · cites this paper as D’Souza et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 100
- Authors
- D'Souza, R. D., Meier, A. M., Bista, P., Wang, Q., & Burkhalter, A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burkhalter, Andreas
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2016-09-26
- Volume
- 5
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5074802
- OpenAlex
- W2524712153
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (R01 EY016184, R01 EY022090)
- McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- visual cortex, cortical hierarchy, parvalbumin interneurons, pyramidal neurons, feedback pathways, feedforward pathways, gain control, layer 2/3, primary visual cortex
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Neural Inhibition, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Visual Cortex, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review