A taxonomy of transcriptomic cell types across the isocortex and hippocampal formation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
SUMMARY The isocortex and hippocampal formation (HPF) in the mammalian brain play critical roles in perception, cognition, emotion and learning. We profiled ~1.3 million cells covering the entire adult mouse isocortex and HPF and derived a transcriptomic cell type taxonomy revealing a comprehensive repertoire of glutamatergic and GABAergic neuron types. Contrary to the traditional view of HPF as having a simpler cellular organization, we discover a complete set of glutamatergic types in HPF homologous to all major subclasses found in the six-layered isocortex, suggesting that HPF and isocortex share a common circuit organization. We also identify large-scale continuous and graded variation of cell types along isocortical depth, across isocortical sheet and in multiple dimensions in hippocampus and subiculum. Overall, our study establishes a molecular architecture of mammalian isocortex and hippocampal formation and begins to shed light on its underlying relationship with the development, evolution, connectivity and function of these brain structures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 65 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
HPF contains a complete set of glutamatergic types homologous to all major subclasses found in the six-layered isocortex.
“we discover a complete set of glutamatergic types in HPF homologous to all major subclasses found in the six-layered isocortex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
They derived a transcriptomic cell type taxonomy that reveals a comprehensive repertoire of glutamatergic and GABAergic neuron types.
“derived a transcriptomic cell type taxonomy revealing a comprehensive repertoire of glutamatergic and GABAergic neuron types”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
They identified large-scale continuous and graded variation of cell types along isocortical depth, across the isocortical sheet, and in multiple dimensions in hippocampus and subiculum.
“We also identify large-scale continuous and graded variation of cell types along isocortical depth, across isocortical sheet and in multiple dimensions in hippocampus and subiculum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The authors profiled approximately 1.3 million cells covering the entire adult mouse isocortex and hippocampal formation.
“We profiled ~1.3 million cells covering the entire adult mouse isocortex and HPF”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The GABAergic inhibitory neuronal class is divided into two neighborhoods that correlate with distinct developmental origins: caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE) and medial ganglionic eminence (MGE).
“The GABAergic inhibitory neuronal class is divided into two neighborhoods that correlate with distinct developmental origins: caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE) (Fig. 2A–E) and medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) (Fig. 2F–J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Transcriptomic neighborhoods of GABAergic neurons correlate with distinct developmental origins (CGE and MGE).
- Findingown data
The L2/3 IT and L4/5/6 IT Car3 neighborhoods are composed of intratelencephalic (IT) and related neuronal types from all layers of all CTX regions as well as RHP regions.
“The L2/3 IT and L4/5/6 IT Car3 neighborhoods are composed of intratelencephalic (IT) and related neuronal types from all layers of all CTX regions as well as RHP regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Lamp5 Lhx6 supertype is much more abundant in HIP than in cortex.
“The Lamp5 Lhx6 supertype is much more abundant in HIP than in cortex”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
They also identified a HIP-specific Pvalb chandelier cell cluster #122 with unique markers Ntf3 and Sntb1.
“We also identified a HIP-specific Pvalb chandelier cell cluster #122 with unique markers Ntf3 and Sntb1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The CTX-HPF GABAergic taxonomy corresponds well with a previous scRNA-seq study of CA1 interneurons, particularly for some HPF-specific clusters identified here.
“Our CTX-HPF GABAergic taxonomy corresponds well with a previous scRNA-seq study of CA1 interneurons (Harris et al., 2018), particularly for some HPF-specific clusters identified here”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harris et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
Based on anatomical annotation and prior knowledge, they assigned the 388 clusters into 4 classes, 8 neighborhoods, 42 subclasses, and 101 supertypes.
“we assigned the 388 clusters into 4 classes, 8 neighborhoods, 42 subclasses, and 101 supertypes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The homologous relationship is supported by shared molecular signatures, including canonical transcription factors, and similar layer-specific distributions.
“This homologous relationship is supported by both shared molecular signatures, including canonical transcription factors, and similar layer-specific distributions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
They obtained 1,228,636 single-cell 10xv2 transcriptomes and 76,381 single-cell SSv4 transcriptomes after quality control.
“to obtain 1,228,636 single-cell 10xv2 transcriptomes and 76,381 single-cell SSv4 transcriptomes after the quality control (QC) process”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ntng1+ cells in HIP are seen at the stratum radiatum/stratum lacunosum-moleculare border.
“Ntng1+ cells in HIP are seen at the stratum radiatum/stratum lacunosum-moleculare border”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The glutamatergic neuronal class is much more complex than the GABAergic class.
“The glutamatergic neuronal class is much more complex than the GABAergic class”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The coverage enabled defining neuronal cell type composition across the entire spatial landscape without significant gaps.
“The coverage enabled defining neuronal cell type composition across the entire spatial landscape without significant gaps”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
They discovered many newly identified cell types in associational cortical areas and HPF.
“including the discovery of many, to the best of our knowledge, newly identified cell types in associational cortical areas and HPF”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The PT neighborhood contains the subclass of CTX L5 pyramidal tract (PT) neurons and two related, region-specific subclasses, L4 RSP-ACA and L5 PPP.
“The PT neighborhood contains the subclass of CTX L5 pyramidal tract (PT) neurons (also known as extratelencephalic or subcerebral projection neurons, SCPNs) and two related, region-specific subclasses, L4 RSP-ACA and L5 PPP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These HPF-specific or enriched clusters include the Lamp5 Lhx6, Ntng1 HPF, Vip Cbln4 HPF, Sst Lmo1 HPF and Sst Ctsc HPF supertypes, and select clusters within shared supertypes.
“These include the Lamp5 Lhx6, Ntng1 HPF, Vip Cbln4 HPF, Sst Lmo1 HPF and Sst Ctsc HPF supertypes, and select clusters within shared supertypes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Integrative clustering of the 10xv2 and SSv4 datasets resulted in 388 consensus clusters.
“Integrative clustering of the 10xv2 and SSv4 datasets resulted in 388 consensus clusters”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
They observed a set of clusters that are specific to or highly enriched in HPF.
“we also observe a set of clusters that are specific to or highly enriched in HPF”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Comparing this taxonomy with six previous studies, they found generally good but variable correspondences.
“Comparing this taxonomy with six previous studies (Cembrowski et al., 2018; Harris et al., 2018; Saunders et al., 2018; Tasic et al., 2018; Yao et al., 2020; Zeisel et al., 2018), we found generally good but variable correspondences”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
The relative proportions of cells in these clusters appear consistent across the different regions.
“Even the relative proportions of cells in these clusters, based the large number of 10xv2 cells, appear consistent across the different regions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Excluding the CR type, they defined 5 neighborhoods, 28 subclasses, 56 supertypes and 241 types/clusters in the glutamatergic class.
“Excluding the CR type, we defined 5 neighborhoods, 28 subclasses, 56 supertypes and 241 types/clusters in the glutamatergic class”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Hippocampal and subicular glutamatergic types are organized along multiple spatial dimensions.
“Similarly, hippocampal and subicular glutamatergic types are organized along multiple spatial dimensions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
They uncovered a resemblance of SUB-ProS and HIP cell types to isocortical cell types.
“We further uncovered a resemblance of SUB-ProS and HIP cell types to isocortical cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
An activity-dependent transcriptional signature is shared in selected clusters across DG, CA3, CA1, ProS, and SUB.
“we also observed an activity-dependent transcriptional signature shared in selected clusters across DG/CA3/CA1/ProS/SUB”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The Cdh7 supertype is specific to L2 of the APr region.
“The Cdh7 supertype is specific to L2 of the APr region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The most dorsal clusters in CA1, CA3, and SUB show higher activity-dependent gene expression than ventral clusters.
“the most dorsal clusters in CA1, CA3 and SUB show high levels of activity-dependent gene expression compared to the ventral part”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chawla et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
L4 IT CTX Rspo1 is transcriptomically continuous with L4/5 IT cells.
“transcriptomically this type is continuous with the L4/5 IT cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The NP/CT/L6b neighborhood contains sets of L5/6 NP, L6 CT and L6b subclasses well matched between CTX and HPF.
“The NP/CT/L6b neighborhood contains sets of L5/6 NP, L6 CT and L6b subclasses well matched between CTX and HPF”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nearly all clusters in CTX glutamatergic subclasses contain cells from multiple isocortical areas.
“Nearly all clusters in these subclasses contain cells from multiple isocortical areas”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cells in each IT cluster fall along a gradient on the pseudo-layer dimension.
“Distribution of cells in each cluster along the pseudo-layer dimension showed that the clusters fall along a gradient”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
L6b CTX is also closely related to supertype L6b ENT Cplx3 Cobll1.
“L6b CTX is also closely related to supertype L6b ENT Cplx3 Cobll1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
It is located more superficially than supertype L5 PT C1ql2 in RSP.
“It is located more superficially than supertype L5 PT C1ql2 in RSP”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
They identified a core set of genes that specify this gradient not only in CA1 and CA3 but also in SUB/ProS and DG.
“We identified a core set of genes that specify this gradient not only in CA1 and CA3 but also in SUB/ProS and DG”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Layer marker separation is more prominent in ventral CA3 than in dorsal CA3.
“The separation of layer markers is more prominent in the ventral part of CA3 than its dorsal part.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Comparing HPF and CTX cell types uncovered parallel correlation between molecular/transcriptomic and spatial/anatomical organization of cell types in both brain structures.
“Comparing HPF and CTX cell types also uncovered parallel correlation between molecular/transcriptomic and spatial/anatomical organization of cell types in both brain structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The correlation approach revealed that most HPF cell types match a specific CTX subclass.
“This approach revealed that most HPF cell types match a specific CTX subclass.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Correlation of gene expression between HPF and CTX clusters indicates homology.
- Findingown data
The Penk+ L2/3 IT ENTl subclass, including the Fign and Ndst4 supertypes, sits in the rostral ENTl.
“The Penk+ L2/3 IT ENTl subclass, including the Fign and Ndst4 supertypes, sits in the rostral ENTl.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clusters in CA1-ve Gpc3 and CA3-do Iyd are often related to L6 IT CTX.
“clusters in CA1-ve Gpc3 and CA3-do Iyd are often related to L6 IT CTX”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Two supertypes, L2 IT ENTm Lef1 and L2 IT ENTl Chn2 (Grik1+), are located at the border between L1 and L2.
“Two supertypes, L2 IT ENTm Lef1 and L2 IT ENTl Chn2 (Grik1+), are located at the border between L1 and L2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In CA1 and CA3, genes loading on the second principal component correspond to the superficial-deep radial axis, as validated by RNA ISH.
“In both CA1 and CA3, key genes contributing to the second PC corresponded to the superficial-deep (Su-De) radial axis, as validated by RNA ISH images”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The dorsal-ventral distribution of CA1 and CA3 clusters follows the taxonomy branches well.
“The Do-Ve distribution of CA1 and CA3 clusters follow the taxonomy branches well”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
L3 IT ENT, L2 IT ENTl and some L2/3 IT PPP clusters were mapped to L4/5 IT CTX.
“Interestingly, L3 IT ENT, L2 IT ENTl and some L2/3 IT PPP clusters were mapped to L4/5 IT CTX.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The NP/CT/L6b neighborhood includes both CTX and HPF cells divided into 7 subclasses: CTX L5/6 near-projecting (NP), L6 corticothalamic (CT), L6b neuron subclasses, and related subclasses from HPF.
“The NP/CT/L6b neighborhood includes both CTX and HPF cells that are divided into 7 subclasses: CTX L5/6 near-projecting (NP), L6 corticothalamic (CT), L6b neuron subclasses, and related subclasses from HPF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CA1 and CA3 cell types are distributed along a superficial-deep division.
“CA1 and CA3 cell types are also distributed along a Su-De division”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
They did not find clusters strongly related to adult neurogenesis in DG.
“We did not find clusters strongly related to adult neurogenesis in DG (Goncalves et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goncalves et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The L6 IT ENTl Dlk1 supertype is specifically located in L6 of the rostral and middle ENTl.
“The L6 IT ENTl Dlk1 supertype is specifically located in L6 of the rostral and middle ENTl.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The L3 IT ENT subclass is found in the caudal part, including the Plch1 supertype specific to ENTm and the Fign supertype specific to ENTl.
“The L3 IT ENT subclass is found in the caudal part, including the Plch1 supertype specific to ENTm and the Fign supertype specific to ENTl.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The CA2 subclass also contains cells from the small IG and FC regions.
“The CA2 subclass also contains cells from the small IG and FC regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CA1, ProS, and SUB cell types together form a proximal-distal transition zone.
“CA1, ProS and SUB cell types together form a Pr-Di transition zone”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The homology is demonstrated by a large set of canonical isocortical cell type marker genes that show similar type and layer specificity in HPF regions, including transcription factors Cux2 and Lhx2 for L2/3/4 IT types, Fezf2, Pou3f1, Bcl6, Bcl11b and Etv1 for L5 PT and its corresponding SUB-ProS-CA1 types, and Tle4 and Foxp2 for CT/NP/L6b types.
“the homology is demonstrated by a large set of canonical isocortical cell type marker genes that show similar type and layer specificity in HPF regions, including transcription factors Cux2 and Lhx2 for L2/3/4 IT types, Fezf2, Pou3f1, Bcl6, Bcl11b and Etv1 for L5 PT and its corresponding SUB-ProS-CA1 types, and Tle4 and Foxp2 for CT/NP/L6b types”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
UMAP of four common CTX IT subclasses revealed a gradual transition from L2/3 to L6.
“UMAP containing the four common CTX IT subclasses (L2/3, L4/5, L5 and L6) revealed a gradual transition of the subclasses from L2/3 to L6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mapping relationships between different hippocampal fields (CA1, CA2, CA3 and DG) and CTX subclasses are more remote and thus less certain.
“The mapping relationships between different hippocampal fields (CA1, CA2, CA3 and DG) and CTX subclasses are more remote (i.e., many more DE genes) and thus less certain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All CTX IT clusters show a vertical gradual transition along cortical depth.
“we identified a vertical gradual transition of all CTX IT clusters along the cortical depth”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A one-dimensional UMAP for all IT cells based on imputed PCs corresponded well with cortical depth.
“we computed one-dimensional UMAP for all the IT cells based on the PCs in imputed space, which corresponded well with cortical depth”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The L5/6 IT TPE-ENT Dcn supertype (Rorb+) contains L5/6 cells in ENTl and caudal ventral part of ENTm.
“The L5/6 IT TPE-ENT Dcn supertype (Rorb+) contains L5/6 cells in ENTl and caudal ventral part of ENTm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The activity-dependent signature includes immediate early genes Ier5, Arc, Fos, Egr4, and Nr4a1.
“It includes many well-established immediate early genes (IEGs) such as Ier5, Arc, Fos, Egr4 and Nr4a1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Multiple marker genes and Visium data confirm the regional specificity of these HPF subclasses and supertypes.
“Multiple marker genes and Visium data confirm the regional specificity of these HPF subclasses and supertypes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Activity-dependent genes are co-expressed with IEGs in a cell type-dependent manner.
“We also identified activity-dependent genes co-expressed with IEGs in a cell type-dependent manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Glutamatergic cell types exhibit gradient distribution along the dorsal-ventral axis in all hippocampal-subicular regions.
“glutamatergic cell types exhibit gradient distribution in the Do-Ve axis in all hippocampal-subicular regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CA1 and CA3, superficial and deep clusters correlate weakly with L2/3 IT CTX and L5 PT CTX, respectively.
“In CA1 and CA3, superficial and deep clusters have a weak correlation with L2/3 IT CTX and L5 PT CTX, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
L4 RSP-ACA Scnn1a is an unusual subclass/supertype.
“L4 RSP-ACA Scnn1a is an unusual subclass/supertype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the less diverse parts of CA1 (most ventral) and CA3 (most dorsal), the superficial-deep distinction is less obvious.
“In the less diverse parts of CA1 (most ventral) and CA3 (most dorsal), the Su-De distinction is also less obvious”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The L2/3 RHP subclass contains two supertypes assigned to the superficial layers of ProS (L2/3 IT ProS Dcn Cbln4) and HATA (IT HATA Id4, also extending to ventral ENT) regions.
“The L2/3 RHP subclass contains two supertypes assigned to the superficial layers of ProS (L2/3 IT ProS Dcn Cbln4, Fig. 4I–J) and HATA (IT HATA Id4, also extending to ventral ENT) regions (Ding et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ding et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In the CA3 subclass, they identify a hilar mossy cell supertype, Mossy Rgs12, based on multiple marker genes including Gal, Rgs12, Glipr1, Necab1 and Calb2.
“In the CA3 subclass, we identify a hilar mossy cell supertype, Mossy Rgs12, based on multiple marker genes including Gal, Rgs12, Glipr1, Necab1 and Calb2 (Scharfman and Myers, 2012)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scharfman and Myers, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Gadd45b has highest expression in DG.
“Gadd45b shows highest expression in DG”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CTX IT clusters, supertypes, and subclasses transition continuously across cortical depth from superficial to deep, making traditional layer separation less clear, especially at L4/L5 and L5/L6 borders.
“Collectively the clusters, and the supertypes and subclasses they belong to, transition continuously across cortical depth from superficial to deep, making the traditional layer separation less clear, especially for the borders between L4 and L5 and between L5 and L6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The DG subclass, marked by Prox1, has a dominant cluster, #363, which contains vast majority of the granule cells.
“The DG subclass, marked by Prox1, has a dominant cluster, #363, which contains vast majority of the granule cells”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
GABAergic neuron types are shared among all isocortical areas and HPF.
“we find that GABAergic neuron types are shared among all isocortical areas and HPF”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The TPE region has a consistent depletion of activated cells across all subclasses.
“the TPE region has a consistent depletion of activated cells across all subclasses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Considering all glutamatergic types together, each isocortical area can be distinguished from all other areas.
“If considering all glutamatergic types together, it is possible to distinguish each area from all other areas”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Deep layers of ENT and PPP, as well as SUB, resemble deep layers of isocortex with parallel sets of NP/CT/L6b types.
“The deep layers of ENT and PPP, as well as SUB, resemble the deep layers of isocortex with parallel sets of NP/CT/L6b types”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ENT and PPP lack major cell types resembling L5 PT, except for a single cluster L5 PPP (#263).
“ENT and PPP do not have major cell types resembling L5 PT, which are the major output projection neuron types from isocortex to subcortical regions, except for a single cluster (L5 PPP, #263)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The dendrogram based on average gene expression profiles groups isocortical areas as lateral/prefrontal TPE/AI/PL-ILA-ORB, medial RSP/ACA, motor MOp/MOs, then sensory AUD, SSp, SSs-GU-VISC, PTLp, and VIS.
“We observe the following grouping based on the tree: lateral and prefrontal areas TPE/AI/PL-ILA-ORB, medial areas RSP/ACA, motor areas MOp and MOs, then all the sensory areas AUD, SSp, SSs-GU-VISC, PTLp and VIS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Isocortical IT neuron types are continuously distributed across the entire cortical depth, from L2/3 to L6.
“isocortical IT neuron types are continuously distributed across the entire cortical depth, from L2/3 to L6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We identified 408 clusters by the integrative clustering pipeline.
“We identified 408 clusters by the integrative clustering pipeline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All major glutamatergic subclasses in isocortex (L2/3-L6 IT, L5 PT, L5/6 NP, L6 CT, L6b) also exist in various HPF regions.
“we find that all major glutamatergic subclasses in isocortex (i.e., L2/3-L6 IT, L5 PT, L5/6 NP, L6 CT and L6b) also exist in various HPF regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Glutamatergic cell types in SUB and different hippocampal fields exhibit simultaneous continuous variation in three dimensions: proximal-distal, dorsal-ventral, and superficial-deep.
“glutamatergic cell types in subiculum (SUB) and different fields of hippocampus (HIP) exhibit simultaneous continuous variation in three dimensions – proximal-distal, dorsal-ventral and superficial-deep”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a parallel organization of homologous sets of glutamatergic neuron types between HPF and isocortex.
“We discover a parallel organization of homologous sets of glutamatergic neuron types between HPF and isocortex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
An additional set of GABAergic types specific to HPF was identified.
“We also identify an additional set of GABAergic types that are specific to HPF”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of cell types in SUB, ProS, and CA1 are homologous to isocortical PT cells.
“we find that majority of the cell types in SUB, ProS and CA1 are homologous to isocortical PT cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Superficial (and deep) layers of lateral and medial ENT and POST-PRE-PAR (PPP), as well as smaller regions ProS, HATA, and APr, resemble superficial (and deep) layers of isocortex with parallel sets of IT types.
“The superficial (and deep) layers of lateral and medial ENT and POST-PRE-PAR (PPP), as well as smaller regions ProS, HATA and APr, resemble the superficial (and deep) layers of isocortex with parallel sets of IT types”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In most cases, cells are preferentially predicted to belong to the region they were dissected from, particularly for medial, lateral, and prefrontal areas.
“In most cases, cells were preferentially predicted to belong to the region they were dissected from, particularly for the medial, lateral, and prefrontal areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A small number of isocortical glutamatergic cell types are specific to one or two regions, mostly ACA and RSP.
“We find a small number of isocortical glutamatergic cell types that are specific to one or two regions (Fig. 3B), mostly to anterior cingulate (ACA) and retrosplenial (RSP) areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Region separation is more distinct for L5 PT and L4/5 IT than for other CTX glutamatergic subclasses.
“Region separation is more distinct for L5 PT and L4/5 IT than for other subclasses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Visual areas (VIS and PTLp) have higher fractions of activated cells than other cortical regions, particularly in the L2/3 IT subclass.
“Visual areas (VIS and PTLp) have higher fractions of activated cells than other regions, particularly in L2/3 IT subclass”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For SUB/ProS/CA1 and isocortical L5 PT cells, homology is supported by co-expression of at least five L5 PT defining transcription factors in SUB/ProS/CA1 cell types, despite lack of similar layer specificity.
“their homology is supported by the co-expression of at least five L5 PT defining transcription factors in SUB/ProS/CA1 cell types”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A few highly activated clusters were identified in L2/3 IT, L6 IT, and L6 CT subclasses across all regions.
“identified a few highly activated clusters in L2/3 IT, L6 IT and L6 CT subclasses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
L2/3 IT CTX Baz1a (cluster #171) is a strongly activated cluster.
“supertype L2/3 IT CTX Baz1a (cluster #171) is a strongly activated cluster”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Six clusters were outside of CTX and HPF and were located to the striatum based on expression of marker genes such as Six3, Adora2a, and Drd2.
“We identified six clusters that were outside of CTX and HPF which we located to the striatum based on the expression of marker genes such as Six3, Adora2a, and Drd2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 8 clusters had fewer than 4 donor animals each.
“Only 8 clusters had fewer than 4 donor animals each.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Many superficial layer markers such as Dio3 have ubiquitous expression in ventral CA1, positioning ventral CA1 closer to the superficial end of the pseudo Su-De axis.
“Many markers expressed at the superficial layer such as Dio3 in the middle section of the Ve-Do axis have ubiquitous expression in the ventral CA1, positioning the ventral CA1 closer to the superficial end of the pseudo Su-De axis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Findingown data
Closer examination revealed significant overlap between the genes that specify the dorsal-ventral gradient in CA1 and CA3.
“Closer examination revealed significant overlap between the genes that specify this gradient in either region, which we hypothesize is the core program for dorsal-ventral gradient specification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Key transcriptional signatures contributing to regional diversity were identified.
“We identified key transcriptional signatures that contribute to regional diversity (Fig. 7D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using this core set of genes, the top PC for cells in both CA1 and CA3 was highly concordant with the original top PC for each region separately.
“Using this core set of genes, we computed the top PC for cells in both regions and found it highly concordant with the original top PC for each region separately.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ISH images of some marker genes in CA1 and CA3 indicate their layer specificity.
“ISH images of some marker genes in CA1 and CA3 indicate their layer specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ProS and CA1-ProS clusters marked by Dcn and Dlk1 had stronger expression of ventral specific genes, placing them near the ventral end of the Pr-Di axis.
“particularly, ProS and CA1-ProS clusters marked by Dcn and Dlk1 overall had stronger expression of ventral specific genes, pushing these clusters close to the ventral end of the axis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some clusters differ from neighboring clusters mostly by immediate early genes such as Fos and Arc.
“Additionally, we also observed that some clusters differ from neighboring clusters mostly by immediate early genes (IEGs) such as Fos and Arc.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many genes in the core set showed variation along the Pr-Di axis.
“We further noticed that many genes in this set still showed variation along the Pr-Di axis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
UMAP for each subclass revealed much clearer regional diversities.
“The UMAP for each subclass revealed much clearer regional diversities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Findingown data
A nonlinear relationship was observed in the PCA space.
“UMAP instead of PCA was chosen here as we observed a nonlinear relationship.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Findingown data
In PCA space, L6 IT types were more similar to L2/3 IT types than L5 IT types were to L2/3 IT types.
“in the PCA space, L6 IT types were more similar to L2/3 IT types than L5 IT types to L2/3 IT types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Findingown data
The top PC based on the DE gene set between clusters #356 and #357 (defined as CA3 Pr-Di axis) correlates heavily with the Do-Ve axis.
“The top PC based on this set of genes is defined as the CA3 Pr-Di axis, which also correlates heavily with the Do-Ve axis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Findingown data
Dorsal cluster #348 is physically more superficial than clusters #346 and #347.
“dorsal cluster #348 is physically more superficial than clusters #346 and 347”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
ISH images of selected genes indicate that the main axis of variation in CA1, ProS and SUB corresponds to a proximal-distal gradient, with cell types transitioning from proximal CA1 (marked by Lct) to distal CA1, CA1/ProS transition zone (Glipr, Dlk1, Dcn), ProS (S100b, Klhl1), and finally distal SUB (Fn1, Cyp26b1).
“ISH images of the selected genes (Fig. S5B, Data S1, HPF gradients) indicate that this axis corresponds to proximal-distal gradient, where cell types transition from the proximal end of CA1 (marked by Lct), to distal CA1, CA1/ProS transition zone (Glipr, Dlk1, Dcn), ProS (S100b, Klhl1), and finally to distal SUB (Fn1, Cyp26b1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The medial (RSP/ACA) and lateral (AI/TPE) regions were highly distinct.
“the medial (RSP/ACA) and lateral (AI/TPE) regions were highly distinct”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Findingown data
Clear transitions between adjacent layers were preserved faithfully by one-dimensional UMAP.
“there were clear transitions between adjacent layers, which were preserved faithfully, by one dimensional UMAP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Findingown data
No notable layer separation was observed for the dorsal part of CA3.
“although we did not observe notable layer separation for dorsal part of CA3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ventral clusters #335 and #336 marked by Kdr are deeper than cluster #334.
“ventral clusters #335 and 336 marked by Kdr are deeper than cluster #334.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For CA3, the proximal-distal axis was not identified as a major PC.
“For CA3, we didn’t identify the proximal-distal axis as a major PC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Rorb in L4/5 IT and Foxp2 in L6 CT show mutually exclusive expression patterns with Tshz2 in RSP.
“Other markers such as Rorb in L4/5 IT and Foxp2 in L6 CT show mutually exclusive expression patterns with Tshz2 in RSP (Fig. 7E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
DE genes between clusters #356 and #357 mostly also separate clusters #356 and #358 from #357 and other ventral CA3 clusters.
“We computed the DE genes between clusters #356 and #357, most of which also separate clusters #356 and #358 from #357 and other ventral CA3 clusters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Layer separation is more subtle in the very ventral or very dorsal areas of CA1.
“Layer separation is more subtle in the very ventral or very dorsal areas of CA1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
An anterior-posterior gradient could be observed in almost all cases.
“anterior-posterior gradient could be observed in almost all cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Findingown data
One-dimensional UMAP for all IT cells based on PCs in imputed space corresponded very well with cortical depth.
“we computed one dimensional UMAP for all the IT cells based on the PCs in the imputed space (see section UMAP projection), which corresponded very well with cortical depth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Interpretationown data
The study establishes a molecular architecture of mammalian isocortex and hippocampal formation.
“our study establishes a molecular architecture of mammalian isocortex and hippocampal formation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Mouse isocortex and hippocampal formation are representative of mammalian isocortex and hippocampal formation.
- Premisecitation
Isocortical and hippocampal GABAergic interneuron types are organized by their embryonic origins, firing characteristics, and local connectivity patterns.
“Isocortical and hippocampal GABAergic interneuron types are similarly organized by their embryonic origins, firing characteristics and local connectivity patterns”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
HPF and isocortex share a common circuit organization.
“suggesting that HPF and isocortex share a common circuit organization”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These studies demonstrate the validity and power of using the highly scalable scRNA-seq approach to generate a comprehensive census of cell types as a foundation for further structural and functional studies of brain circuits.
“These studies demonstrate the validity and power of using the highly scalable scRNA-seq approach to generate a comprehensive census of cell types as a foundation for further structural and functional studies of brain circuits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
The Lamp5 Lhx6 supertype is likely derived from MGE instead of CGE.
“is likely derived from MGE instead of CGE (Pelkey et al., 2017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pelkey et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The Cxcr4+ cells may correspond to the hilar performant path-associated (HIPP) or DG somatostatin-expressing-interneurons (DG-SOMIs) described previously.
“The Cxcr4+ cells may correspond to the hilar performant path-associated (HIPP) or DG somatostatin-expressing-interneurons (DG-SOMIs) described previously (Yuan et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yuan et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A Patch-seq study simultaneously profiled transcriptomic, electrophysiological, and morphological properties of a large set of GABAergic interneurons from mouse visual cortex and found excellent correspondence among the three modalities.
“using the Patch-seq approach, we simultaneously profiled the transcriptomic, electrophysiological, and morphological properties of a large set of GABAergic interneurons from mouse visual cortex and found excellent correspondence among the three modalities”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gouwens et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
L4 IT CTX Rspo1 likely represents L4 spiny stellate or star pyramid neurons that are morphologically distinct from pyramidal neurons in other layers.
“This supertype likely represents the L4 spiny stellate or star pyramid neurons that are morphologically distinct from the pyramidal neurons in other layers (Harris and Shepherd, 2015)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harris and Shepherd, 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CA1, CA3 and SUB have gradual gene expression and connectivity changes along multiple dimensions - superficial-deep, proximal-distal and dorsal-ventral.
“CA1, CA3 and SUB have gradual gene expression and connectivity changes along multiple dimensions – superficial-deep, proximal-distal and dorsal-ventral (Cembrowski and Spruston, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cembrowski and Spruston, 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The presence of these cell types in close proximity with isocortical neuron types in taxonomy tree and UMAP suggests homologous relationships between HPF and CTX cell types.
“the presence of these cell types in close proximity with isocortical neuron types (particularly in the L2/3 IT, L4/5/6 IT and NP/CT/L6b neighborhoods) in taxonomy tree and UMAP suggests homologous relationships between HPF and CTX cell types”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This indicates that immature neurons or progenitors might not be well labeled by the pan-neuronal or pan-glutamatergic Cre lines used for this study.
“indicating that immature neurons or progenitors might not be well labeled by the pan-neuronal or pan-glutamatergic Cre lines we used for this study”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The pseudo-layer dimension corresponds to actual cortical layers, as established by layer-specific marker gene expression.
“Correspondence between the pseudo-layer dimension and actual cortical layers was established by calculating the expression of layer-specific marker genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
ProS contains cell types similar to either SUB or CA1, as in previous study.
“suggesting ProS contains cell types similar to either SUB or CA1, as in our previous study (Ding et al., 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ding et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The gene expression makeup, layer specificity and projection pattern altogether suggest that L4 RSP-ACA Scnn1a has an IT/PT hybrid identity.
“The gene expression makeup, layer specificity and projection pattern altogether suggest that L4 RSP-ACA Scnn1a has an IT/PT hybrid identity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Individual mouse variability should not affect the cell type identities.
“Thus, individual mouse variability should not affect the cell type identities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Continuous gradient-like distribution of closely related cell types in various spatial dimensions appears to be a widely applicable rule.
“Thus, continuous gradient-like distribution of closely related cell types in various spatial dimensions appears to be a widely applicable rule.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Relative proportions of different cell types in each region were estimated using 10xv2 data.
“we also provided an estimate of the relative proportions of different cell types in each region using the 10xv2 data”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The relative proportions estimated from 10xv2 data reflect true proportions of cell types in each region.
- Interpretationown data
The finding that all major isocortical glutamatergic subclasses also exist in HPF challenges the traditional view that isocortex is newly evolved whereas HPF remains an older structure during vertebrate evolution.
“This finding challenges the traditional view that isocortex is newly evolved whereas HPF remains as an older structure during vertebrate evolution”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The shared dorsoventral differentially expressed gene sets across hippocampal-subicular regions suggest a common regulatory program for these specific circuits.
“The shared dorsoventral differentially expressed gene sets across these regions identified in our study suggest a common regulatory program for these specific circuits”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Homologous cell types exist in HPF for all subclasses of isocortical glutamatergic neurons.
“Therefore, we can find homologous cell types in HPF for all subclasses of isocortical glutamatergic neurons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The difference in developmental origins between isocortical glutamatergic neurons (VZ/SVZ) and GABAergic interneurons (MGE/CGE) may be the underlying reason for the dichotomy between extensive regional diversity of glutamatergic types and sharing of a common set of GABAergic types across isocortical regions.
“This difference in developmental origins may be the underlying reason for the dichotomy between the extensive regional diversity of glutamatergic types and the sharing of a common set of GABAergic types across isocortical regions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tasic et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The integrative clustering pipeline allows resolving clusters at fine resolution while ensuring proper alignment between datasets by requiring presence of conserved DE genes.
“This integrative clustering pipeline allows us to resolve clusters at fine resolution while ensuring proper alignment between datasets by requiring presence of conserved DE genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These HPF cell types are components of an integrated HPF circuit that follows similar connectional rules to a canonical isocortical circuit.
“These cell types are components of the integrated HPF circuit that follows similar connectional rules seen in a canonical isocortical circuit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The SUB, ProS, and CA1 PT-like cell types may be the major HPF output projection neurons to other cortical and subcortical regions.
“suggesting that these cell types may be the major HPF output projection neurons to other cortical and subcortical regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Anatomical locations of major cell types were assigned using existing RNA ISH data from the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas and a limited Visium dataset.
“we assigned anatomical locations of major cell types (mostly at the supertype level) using existing RNA ISH data from the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas and a limited Visium dataset”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The anatomical locations assigned using existing RNA ISH data from the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas and a limited Visium dataset are accurate enough for major cell types.
- Interpretationreasoning
The relative positions along the pseudo Su-De axis for ventral and dorsal clusters still make sense.
“Nevertheless, the relative positions along pseudo Su-De axis for ventral and dorsal clusters still make sense.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Interpretationreasoning
The KNN-based estimate of regional specificity is very conservative because specificity from very small gene sets might have been missed.
“This is a very conservative estimate of regional specificity, as it is possible that we might have missed the specificity contributed by very small sets of genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 10xv2 and SSv4 datasets share conserved global transcriptional signatures that permit cross-platform mapping of regional identity.
- Interpretationreasoning
The pseudo Su-De axis is confounded with the Ve-Do axis.
“Therefore, the pseudo Su-De axis is confounded with the Ve-Do axis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Interpretationcitation
The observed CA3 Pr-Di axis is consistent with previously defined CA3 subdomains that divide CA3 into diagonal bands oriented septal-distally to temporal-proximally.
“This is consistent with the previously defined CA3 subdomains (Thompson et al., 2008), which divided CA3 into a series of diagonal bands oriented septal-distally (toward CA2) to temporal-proximally (toward DG).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thompson et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
- Study design and conductreasoning
Regional signatures were confounded with donor-specific transcriptional signatures because only one cortical region was isolated from each donor.
“Note that we only isolated one cortical region from each donor, so regional signatures were confounded with donor-specific transcriptional signatures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 123
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 43
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe GABAergic neuronal class contains 6 subclasses and 119 clusters; the glutamatergic neuronal class contains 28 subclasses and 241 clusters; the astrocyte/oligodendrocyte non-neuronal class contains 2 subclasses and 14 clusters; and the immune/vascular non-neuronal class contains 4 subclasses and 10 clusters.
“The GABAergic neuronal class contains 6 subclasses and 119 clusters; the glutamatergic neuronal class contains 28 subclasses and 241 clusters; the astrocyte/oligodendrocyte non-neuronal class contains 2 subclasses and 14 clusters; and the immune/vascular non-neuronal class contains 4 subclasses and 10 clusters”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationFor CGE, the Ntng1 HPF supertype does not express canonical pan-CGE marker Prox1 nor its subclass markers Vip, Sncg or Lamp5.
“For CGE, the Ntng1 HPF supertype does not express canonical pan-CGE marker Prox1 (Miyoshi et al., 2015; Rubin and Kessaris, 2013) nor its subclass markers Vip, Sncg or Lamp5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Miyoshi et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rubin and Kessaris, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll GABAergic neuron types in isocortex are shared with HPF, whereas HPF also contains additional GABAergic types unique to itself.
“we find that all GABAergic neuron types in isocortex are shared with HPF, whereas HPF also contains additional GABAergic types unique to itself”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEach neighborhood is further divided into 3 subclasses: Lamp5, Sncg and Vip in CGE, and Sst Chodl, Sst and Pvalb in MGE.
“Each neighborhood is further divided into 3 subclasses: Lamp5, Sncg and Vip in CGE, and Sst Chodl, Sst and Pvalb in MGE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 'Other' neighborhood includes all non-neuronal subclasses, as well as two neuronal subclasses, Cajal-Retzius (CR) (glutamatergic, mostly in layer 1) and Meis2 (GABAergic, mostly in white matter).
“The ‘Other’ neighborhood, briefly mentioned here, includes all non-neuronal subclasses, as well as two neuronal subclasses, Cajal-Retzius (CR) (glutamatergic, mostly in layer 1) and Meis2 (GABAergic, mostly in white matter)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIts clusters #5, 8 and 9 are HPF-specific and are marked by Rxfp3 which is found in CA3.
“its clusters #5, 8 and 9 are HPF-specific and are marked by Rxfp3 which is found in CA3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost clusters are shared by all isocortical areas and also by RHP regions.
“most clusters are shared by all isocortical areas, consistent with our previous observations (Tasic et al., 2018), and also by RHP regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tasic et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGlutamatergic neuron types from different HPF regions are highly distinct from but also homologous to those in isocortex.
“glutamatergic neuron types from different HPF regions are highly distinct from but also, surprisingly, homologous to those in isocortex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors covered all of the adult mouse isocortex and HPF, analyzing more than 1.3 million cells with two different scRNA-seq platforms (10x and SMART-Seq).
“Here we cover all of the adult mouse isocortex and HPF, analyzing >1.3 million cells with two different scRNA-seq platforms (10x and SMART-Seq).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataClustering 10xv2 and SSv4 cells separately resulted in 332 10xv2 clusters and 324 SSv4 clusters.
“We first clustered 10xv2 and SSv4 cells separately, resulting in 332 10xv2 clusters and 324 SSv4 clusters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe greatest distinction in GABAergic interneuron type composition is between CTX and HIP itself; the RHP regions often contain both CTX and HIP clusters, with a few exceptions.
“The greatest distinction in GABAergic interneuron type composition is between CTX and HIP itself; the RHP regions often contain both CTX and HIP clusters, with a few exceptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe taxonomy is also consistent with the large body of literature on cortical GABAergic interneurons and with the authors' Patch-seq study, with MET types corresponding well with the supertypes defined here.
“It is also consistent with the large body of literature on cortical GABAergic interneurons (Lim et al., 2018; Pelkey et al., 2017; Tremblay et al., 2016), and our Patch-seq study (Gouwens et al., 2020) with MET types defined in that study corresponding well with the supertypes defined here”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Sst subclass has multiple HPF-enriched clusters, most of which are marked by Npffr1.
“The Sst subclass has multiple HPF-enriched clusters, most of which are marked by Npffr1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThey developed a consensus clustering approach to combine the two datasets and derived a cell type taxonomy comprising 388 transcriptomic types, of which 364 are neuronal.
“We developed a consensus clustering approach to combine the two datasets and derived a cell type taxonomy comprising 388 transcriptomic types of which 364 are neuronal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThey grouped the subclasses into 8 neighborhoods: 2 GABAergic (CGE and MGE), 5 glutamatergic (L2/3 IT, L4/5/6 IT Car3, PT, NP/CT/L6b, and DG/SUB/CA), and one 'Other' neighborhood.
“We grouped the subclasses into 8 neighborhoods, 2 GABAergic (CGE and MGE), 5 glutamatergic (L2/3 IT, L4/5/6 IT Car3, PT, NP/CT/L6b, and DG/SUB/CA), and one ‘Other’ neighborhood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClusters #54-55 in supertype Vip Cbln4 HPF are marked by Qrfpr, also expressed in CA3.
“Clusters #54–55 in supertype Vip Cbln4 HPF are marked by Qrfpr, also expressed in CA3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe current CTX-HPF GABAergic taxonomy is largely consistent with previous transcriptomic taxonomies derived from cortical areas VISp-ALM and MOp at the supertype level but exhibits notable ambiguity at the type/cluster level.
“The current CTX-HPF GABAergic taxonomy is largely consistent with previous transcriptomic taxonomies derived from cortical areas VISp-ALM (Tasic et al., 2018) and MOp (Yao et al., 2020) at the supertype level but exhibits notable ambiguity at the type/cluster level”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Tasic et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yao et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the MGE neighborhood, the Sst Chodl subclass remains as one group; the Sst and Pvalb subclasses are divided into 11 and 3 supertypes, respectively.
“In the MGE neighborhood, the Sst Chodl subclass remains as one group (representing long-range projecting Sst cells); the Sst and Pvalb subclasses are divided into 11 and 3 supertypes, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the CGE neighborhood, the Lamp5, Sncg and Vip subclasses are divided into 4, 5, and 6 supertypes, respectively.
“In the CGE neighborhood, the Lamp5 (mostly neurogliaform cells), Sncg and Vip subclasses are divided into 4, 5 (one containing Vip cells), and 6 supertypes, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThey constitute the largest proportion of cell types, with 14 subclasses that correspond well to specific layers (L2-6) and/or regions.
“They constitute the largest proportion of cell types, with 14 subclasses that correspond well to specific layers (L2–6) and/or regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany isocortical glutamatergic types are shared across multiple areas and exhibit gradient-like gene expression variations along the cortical sheet.
“Many isocortical glutamatergic types are shared across multiple areas and exhibit gradient-like gene expression variations along the cortical sheet.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome clusters are largely absent from HIP (e.g., Lamp5 Pax6, Sst Syndig1l and Sst Hpse supertypes), while others have CTX- or HPF-selective counterparts (e.g., Sst Myh8 and Sst Etv1 clusters in CTX versus those in HPF).
“Conversely, some clusters are largely absent from HIP (e.g. Lamp5 Pax6, Sst Syndig1l and Sst Hpse supertypes), while others have CTX- or HPF-selective counterparts (e.g. Sst Myh8 and Sst Etv1 clusters in CTX versus those in HPF).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSst Ctsc HPF is a highly distinct HPF-specific supertype; clusters #102-103 are marked by Rxfp3 which is expressed in CA3, while clusters #104-105 are marked by Cxcr4 expressed in the polymorphic layer of DG (DG-po, also known as the hilus).
“Sst Ctsc HPF is a highly distinct HPF-specific supertype; clusters #102–103 are marked by Rxfp3 which is expressed in CA3, while clusters #104–105 are marked by Cxcr4 expressed in the polymorphic layer of DG (DG-po, also known as the hilus)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CA1, supertype CA1-ve Gpc3 (#334-336) is most ventral, CA1 Lefty1 (#337-345) is next, and CA1-do Plekhg1 (#346-348) is most dorsal.
“In CA1, supertype CA1-ve Gpc3 (#334–336) is in the most ventral location, followed by CA1 Lefty1 (#337–345), and CA1-do Plekhg1 (#346–348) most dorsal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThey performed PCA for CA1 and CA3 separately and found the top PC corresponded to a dorsal-ventral (Do-Ve) gradient.
“we performed PCA for CA1 and CA3 (excluding the Mossy Rgs12 supertype) separately and found the top PC corresponded to a dorsal-ventral (Do-Ve) gradient”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataL4 IT CTX Rspo1 is an L4-specific supertype that predominantly contains cells from all sensory areas but also some from non-sensory isocortical areas.
“We identified a L4 specific supertype, L4 IT CTX Rspo1, which predominantly contains cells from all sensory areas but surprisingly, some from non-sensory isocortical areas as well”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe PT neighborhood (Bcl6+) is segregated into three region-specific subclasses, L5 PT CTX (Fam84b+), L4 RSP-ACA, and L5 PPP (the only HPF-specific cell type identified in this neighborhood).
“The PT neighborhood (Bcl6+) is segregated into three region-specific subclasses, L5 PT CTX (Fam84b+), L4 RSP-ACA, and L5 PPP (the only HPF-specific cell type identified in this neighborhood)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CA3, supertype CA3-do Iyd (#356-358) is dorsal and CA3-ve Fam107a (#351-355) is more ventral.
“In CA3, supertype CA3-do Iyd (#356–358) is in the dorsal location, and CA3-ve Fam107a (#351–355) more ventral.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is large divergence between dorsal clusters of SUB and CA1 along the proximal-distal axis, but convergence in the ventral parts of CA1 and ProS (and HATA).
“While there is a large divergence between the dorsal clusters of SUB and CA1 along the Pr-Di axis, there is a convergence in the ventral parts of CA1 and ProS (and HATA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThey observe two parallel continuous transitions between L6 CT and L6b types for both CTX and ENT, and a continuous transition of L6b cells between CTX and all HPF regions.
“We observe two parallel continuous transitions between L6 CT and L6b types for both CTX and ENT, and a continuous transition of L6b cells between CTX and all HPF regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe DG/SUB/CA neighborhood comprises cells specifically located in CA1, CA2, CA3, ProS, SUB and DG, divided into 5 region-specific subclasses.
“Lastly, the DG/SUB/CA neighborhood comprises cells that are specifically located in CA1, CA2, CA3, ProS, SUB and DG which are divided into 5 region-specific subclasses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataL5 PT CTX contains 4 supertypes: Chrna6 (enriched in posterior sensory areas and highly distinct from the other three supertypes), Npnt, Cdh13 and C1ql2 (enriched in RSP-ACA).
“L5 PT CTX contains 4 supertypes: Chrna6 (enriched in posterior sensory areas and highly distinct from the other three supertypes), Npnt, Cdh13 and C1ql2 (enriched in RSP-ACA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe ENT IT group has 10 supertypes organized in a layer-selective manner, in the order of L2, L2/3, L3, L5 and L6, consistent with their correspondence with CTX L2/3-L6 IT types, and shows differential spatial distribution along the anterior-posterior axis.
“The ENT IT group (Fig. 4B–D, F–H) has 10 supertypes organized in a layer-selective manner, in the order of L2, L2/3, L3, L5 and L6, consistent with their correspondence with CTX L2/3-L6 IT types, and shows differential spatial distribution along the anterior-posterior axis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll SUB and ProS clusters are most related to L5 PT CTX, as is cluster L5 PPP #263 (though more distantly).
“All SUB and ProS clusters are most related to L5 PT CTX, so is cluster L5 PPP #263 (though more distantly).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAs with the IT cells, the CTX L5 NP, L6 CT and L6b clusters are largely shared across cortical areas, whereas the HPF NP and CT cell types are highly distinct among SUB, ENT and PPP.
“As with the IT cells (Fig. 4), the CTX L5 NP, L6 CT and L6b clusters are largely shared across cortical areas (Fig. 5A, D, S2), whereas the HPF NP and CT cell types are highly distinct among SUB, ENT and PPP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Cdh13 supertype, clusters #251-255 (Nnat+) are mostly populated by cells from prefrontal, medial and lateral associational areas, and #251 is highly specific to PL-ILA and ACA-RSP, based on marker genes Ndnf and Dlk1.
“Of note, in the Cdh13 supertype, clusters #251–255 (Nnat+) are mostly populated by cells from prefrontal, medial and lateral associational areas, and #251 is highly specific to PL-ILA and ACA-RSP, based on marker genes Ndnf and Dlk1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataL5/6 NP CTX is closely related to NP SUB and more distantly related to NP PPP.
“L5/6 NP CTX is closely related to NP SUB and more distantly related to NP PPP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThey systematically identified a large number of neuronal types and subclasses from different HPF regions that are highly distinct from those in CTX and from each other.
“We systematically identified a large number of neuronal types and subclasses from different HPF regions that are highly distinct from those in CTX and from each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe PPP IT group contains the L2/3 IT PPP subclass and is most closely related to supertype L2 IT RSP-ACA Npnt (cluster #134), consistent with the anatomical proximity of PPP and RSP.
“The PPP IT group (Fig. 4B–C, E–F, I–J) contains the L2/3 IT PPP subclass and is most closely related to supertype L2 IT RSP-ACA Npnt (cluster #134), consistent with the anatomical proximity of PPP and RSP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationProjection mapping showed that neurons labeled via Scnn1a-Tg3-Cre driver line in RSP have long-range projections to both intra- and extratelencephalic targets; they project to ACA, RHP regions, contralateral RSP, and anteroventral nucleus (AV) of thalamus.
“Projection mapping (http://connectivity.brain-map.org/; experiments 166269090, 166458363 and 181860879) (Oh et al., 2014) showed that neurons labeled via Scnn1a-Tg3-Cre driver line in RSP have long-range projections to both intra- and extratelencephalic targets; they project to ACA, RHP regions, contralateral RSP, and anteroventral nucleus (AV) of thalamus”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oh et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHPF IT cell types form two groups around the relatively continuous CTX IT types, one mainly from ENT and the other from PPP.
“HPF IT cell types form two groups around the relatively continuous CTX IT types, one mainly from ENT and the other from PPP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is rarely a one-to-one correspondence between CTX glutamatergic clusters and regions, although some clusters are enriched in specific areas.
“Although enrichment in specific areas is seen for some clusters, there is rarely one-to-one correspondence between clusters and regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCTX NP, CT and L6b subclasses have the greatest similarity with their counterparts in ENT, PPP and SUB, as do CTX L2/3, L4/5 and L6 IT subclasses.
“CTX NP, CT and L6b subclasses have the greatest similarity with their counterparts in ENT, PPP and SUB, as do CTX L2/3, L4/5 and L6 IT subclasses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataL6 CT CTX is closely related to CT SUB as well as supertype L6 CT ENT Rasgrf2 Rmst.
“L6 CT CTX is closely related to CT SUB as well as supertype L6 CT ENT Rasgrf2 Rmst.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThey extracted one main axis that drove CA1, ProS and SUB variation by one dimensional UMAP of all the cells in the CA1-ProS and SUB-ProS subclasses, and found that this axis corresponded to a proximal-distal (Pr-Di) gradient from CA1 to SUB, for which each stage of the transition was driven by a different set of genes.
“We first extracted one main axis that drove CA1, ProS and SUB variation by one dimensional UMAP of all the cells in the CA1-ProS and SUB-ProS subclasses, and found that this axis corresponded to a proximal-distal (Pr-Di) gradient from CA1 to SUB, for which each stage of the transition was driven by a different set of genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe three ALM L5 PT types previously identified correspond to cluster #248 (thalamus-projecting cells) in the Npnt supertype and clusters #249 and #252 (medulla-projecting cells) in the Cdh13 supertype, respectively.
“The three ALM L5 PT types previously identified (Economo et al., 2018; Tasic et al., 2018) correspond to cluster #248 (thalamus-projecting cells) in the Npnt supertype and clusters #249 and #252 (medulla-projecting cells) in the Cdh13 supertype, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the DG/SUB/CA neighborhood, DG, CA2 and CA3 subclasses are highly distinct, whereas SUB-ProS and CA1-ProS subclasses are more closely related.
“In the DG/SUB/CA neighborhood, DG, CA2 and CA3 subclasses are highly distinct, whereas SUB-ProS and CA1-ProS subclasses are more closely related”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe SUB-ProS and CA1-ProS subclasses both contain clusters from ProS.
“The SUB-ProS and CA1-ProS subclasses both contain clusters from ProS”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIt expresses PT marker gene Bcl6 but not Fam84b; it also expresses a pan-IT marker Slc30a3, as well as L4 IT-specific markers Rspo1 and Scnn1a but not Rorb.
“It expresses PT marker gene Bcl6 but not Fam84b; it also expresses a pan-IT marker Slc30a3, as well as L4 IT-specific markers Rspo1 and Scnn1a but not Rorb”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe L6b CTX subclass also contains cells from ENT, PPP and SUB; these cells are mostly in supertype L6b RHP Nxph4 Cobll1.
“The L6b CTX subclass also contains cells from ENT, PPP and SUB; these cells are mostly in supertype L6b RHP Nxph4 Cobll1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe supertypes within L2/3 IT PPP follow a rostral dorsal to caudal ventral transition, starting with the Pdlim1 supertype in L2 of RSPv, POST and PRE, then the Kit supertype in L2/3 of POST-PRE, followed by the Wfs1 Prlr supertype in L2/3 of PAR, and the Cfap58 supertype (#145) in caudal PAR.
“The supertypes within L2/3 IT PPP follow a rostral dorsal to caudal ventral transition (Fig. 4E, I–J), starting with the Pdlim1 supertype in L2 of RSPv, POST and PRE, then the Kit supertype in L2/3 of POST-PRE, followed by the Wfs1 Prlr supertype in L2/3 of PAR, and the Cfap58 supertype (#145) in caudal PAR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn almost all CTX glutamatergic subclasses, medial (RSP/ACA) and lateral (TPE) regions are more distinct, while the anterior-to-posterior transition is more continuous.
“In almost all cases, the medial (RSP/ACA) and lateral (TEa-PERI-ECT, collectively TPE) regions are more distinct while the anterior-to-posterior transition is more continuous.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGlutamatergic neuron types are more diverse than GABAergic neuron types, both molecularly and spatially.
“Glutamatergic neuron types are more diverse than GABAergic neuron types, both molecularly and spatially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSorting more cells into one tube diluted the ACSF in the collection buffer, causing cell death.
“We found that sorting more cells into one tube diluted the ACSF in the collection buffer, causing cell death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe homologous relationships between HPF and isocortical cell types are supported by similar expression patterns of a large set of marker genes, including canonical isocortical subclass-specific transcription factors, and by similar laminar localization in ISH and Visium data for corresponding IT/NP/CT/L6b pairs.
“These homologous relationships are supported by similar expression patterns of a large set of marker genes including canonical isocortical subclass-specific transcription factors (Fig. S3), and similar laminar localization as demonstrated by ISH and Visium data, between corresponding pairs of IT/NP/CT/L6b cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross all isocortical areas, most glutamatergic cell types are shared among multiple areas, contrary to previous findings from VISp and ALM.
“Across all isocortical areas, most glutamatergic cell types are shared among multiple areas (Fig. 3B, S2), contrary to what we found in our previous study of two distantly located cortical areas, VISp and ALM”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tasic et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPairwise correlation heatmaps are consistent with the area dendrogram and show TPE and RSP as the most distinct areas.
“The pairwise correlation heatmaps of all areas for each subclass reveal consistent patterns with the tree, and again showing TPE and RSP as the most distinct areas”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenDecreased cell viability was observed for longer sorts.
“We also observed decreased cell viability for longer sorts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSSv4 libraries were sequenced to a target read depth of 0.5M reads per cell, with range 100,275-12,329,698 and median 1,003,867.
“Briefly, libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2500 platform (paired-end with read lengths of 50 bp) to a target read depth of 0.5M reads per cell (range 100,275–12,329,698, median 1,003,867).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were three small, sex specific clusters, #158, #262, #335, all female specific and almost all the cells in these clusters are from highly specific regions in AI, RSP and HIP respectively.
“There were three small, sex specific clusters, #158, #262, #335, all female specific and almost all the cells in these clusters are from highly specific regions in AI, RSP and HIP respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn both glutamatergic and GABAergic classes, some cell types are highly specific to a region, layer, or location, while others are widely distributed and shared among multiple regions.
“In both classes, some cell types are highly specific to a region, layer or location, while others are widely distributed and shared among multiple regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor 10xv2, the study profiled 12 joint regions for CTX and 3 joint regions for HPF with 30,000-300,000 cells per region; for SSv4, it profiled 17 regions for CTX and 5 regions for HPF with 1,100-14,000 cells per region.
“In total, for 10xv2, we profiled 12 joint regions for CTX and 3 joint regions for HPF with 30,000–300,000 cells per region; for SSv4, we profiled 17 regions for CTX and 5 regions for HPF with 1,100–14,000 cells per region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study defines 28 subclasses, 56 supertypes, and 241 types/clusters in the glutamatergic class and 6 subclasses, 30 supertypes, and 119 types/clusters in the GABAergic class.
“We define 28 subclasses, 56 supertypes and 241 types/clusters in the glutamatergic class and 6 subclasses, 30 supertypes and 119 types/clusters in the GABAergic class.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRegional variations are not uniform among subclasses; L5 PT and L4/5 IT types appear more distinct across areas than types in other subclasses, and different subclasses contain types enriched in different areas.
“Regional variations are not uniform among different subclasses, for example, L5 PT and L4/5 IT types appear more distinct across areas than types in other subclasses, and different subclasses contain types that are enriched in different areas”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMedial, prefrontal, and lateral associational areas are more distinct from sensorimotor areas and from each other; sensorimotor areas are more continuous but several domains (posterior sensory, lateral sensory, frontal motor) can be discerned.
“Overall, we find that medial, prefrontal and lateral associational areas are more distinct from sensorimotor areas and from each other; sensorimotor areas are more continuous but several domains (posterior sensory, lateral sensory and frontal motor) can be discerned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor isocortical glutamatergic types, a small number are specific to one or two regions, all in associational areas, while most types are shared among several or multiple areas with graded variations.
“For glutamatergic types in isocortex, we find a small number of types that are specific to one or two regions, all in associational areas; but most types are shared among several or multiple areas with graded variations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe actual median sequencing depth achieved was 59,728 reads per cell across 175 libraries, against a target of 60,000 reads per cell.
“We targeted sequencing depth of 60,000 reads per cell; the actual median achieved was 59,728 reads per cell across 175 libraries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were three main categories of noise clusters: clusters located outside areas of interest due to inaccurate dissection, clusters with significantly lower gene detection due to extensive drop out, and clusters due to doublets or contamination.
“There were three main categories of noise clusters: clusters located outside areas of interest due to inaccurate dissection, clusters with significantly lower gene detection due to extensive drop out, and clusters due to doublets or contamination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study used 530 male and female animals to collect 76,381 cells for SSv4 and 54 male and female animals to collect 1,561,952 cells for 10xv2.
“We used 530 male and female animals to collect 76,381 cells for SSv4 and 54 male and female animals to collect 1,561,952 cells for 10xv2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningGlutamatergic types in different HPF regions are highly distinct from each other and from those in isocortex, consistent with a more ancient emergence of HPF and its subregions.
“Glutamatergic types in different HPF regions are highly distinct from each other and from those in isocortex, consistent with the notion of a more ancient emergence of HPF and its subregions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is very little confusion between distant cortical regions, but considerable confusion between neighboring regions, particularly sensory areas.
“There is very little confusion between regions that are distant, whereas considerable confusion exists between neighboring regions, particularly for sensory areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe current CTX-HPF GABAergic taxonomy corresponds well with previous transcriptomic and multimodal studies from individual regions, with the most robust correspondence at supertype level.
“Our current CTX-HPF GABAergic taxonomy corresponds well with previous transcriptomic and multimodal studies from individual regions; the correspondence is the most robust at supertype level”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIndividual clusters within each CTX glutamatergic subclass occupy specific domains on the gradient map, with more similar clusters located closer to each other.
“Individual clusters within each subclass occupy specific domains on the gradient map, with more similar clusters located closer to each other”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe number of animals contributing to each cluster varies between 2 and 213, with an average of 56 and median of 44.
“The number of animals contributing to each cluster varies between 2 and 213, with an average of 56 and median of 44.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataL5/6 NP and GABAergic cells appear much less activated and show little regional difference.
“L5/6 NP and GABAergic cells appear much less activated and show little regional difference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCell types are shared between ventral RSP and POST-PRE, and between lateral associational cortical areas and ENT.
“We also identify cell types that are shared between ventral RSP and post- and presubiculum (POST-PRE), and between lateral associational cortical areas and entorhinal cortex (ENT)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the transcriptomic level, cell types can be organized hierarchically over a complex landscape with both discrete and continuous variations, and these molecular relationships correlate strongly with spatial arrangement (location and layer).
“At transcriptomic level, cell types can be organized in a hierarchical manner over a complex landscape with both discrete and continuous variations. Such molecular relationships correlate strongly with the spatial arrangement (both location and layer) of the cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFmo1, a previously known CA3 proximal gene, is expressed in dorsal clusters #356 and #358 but not #357.
“a previously known CA3 proximal gene, Fmo1 (Thompson et al., 2008), that is expressed in dorsal clusters #356 and #358, but not #357.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thompson et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany deep layer markers such as Lpl have ubiquitous expression in dorsal distal CA1, positioning these cells closer to the deep end of the pseudo Su-De axis.
“while many deep layer markers such as Lpl have ubiquitous expression in the dorsal distal CA1, positioning these cells closer to the deep end of the pseudo Su-De axis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBesides the genes in the core program, each region also has a specific set of genes that contribute to this axis, e.g., ventrally Coch (CA3) and Gpc3 (CA1/ProS, likely in HATA), dorsally Rxfp1 and Elfn1 (SUB/ProS), Wfs1 (CA1), and Rph3a (CA3).
“Besides the genes in the core program, each region also has a specific set of genes that contribute to this axis (Fig. S5C), e.g., ventrally Coch (CA3) and Gpc3 (CA1/ProS, likely in HATA), dorsally Rxfp1 and Elfn1 (SUB/ProS), Wfs1 (CA1), and Rph3a (CA3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWe selected a core set of genes with absolute correlation greater than 0.4 in both CA1 and CA3, including 84 dorsal-specific genes and 116 ventral-specific genes shared by CA1 and CA3.
“We selected a core set of genes with absolute correlation greater than 0.4 in both cases. These include 84 dorsal-specific genes and 116 ventral-specific genes that are shared by CA1 and CA3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost regional markers identified show distinct layer specificity, and very few genes show the same regional preference across all layers.
“Interestingly, most regional markers we identified show distinct layer specificity, and very few genes show the same regional preference across all layers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile differences in the number of genes detected at the subclass level were observed, cells within a subclass had relatively homogeneous distribution.
“While we observed differences in the number of genes detected at the subclass level, cells within a subclass had relatively homogeneous distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWe computed the top 50 DE genes in each direction for all pairs of glutamatergic clusters in CTX (2,100 genes) and HPF (2,467 genes) separately, with 1,633 genes in common.
“To study their correspondence systematically, we first computed the top 50 DE genes in each direction for all pairs of glutamatergic clusters in CTX (2,100 genes) and HPF (2,467 genes) separately, with 1,633 genes in common.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing the same gene set in SUB/ProS and DG regions, we again observed segregation of clusters along this gradient, which also corresponded to the dorsal-ventral axis in SUB/ProS/DG based on ISH of key marker genes.
“We used the same gene set to compute the top PC in SUB/ProS and DG regions and again observed segregation of clusters along this gradient, which also corresponded to dorsal-ventral axis in SUB/ProS/DG based on ISH of key marker genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CA3, St18, Hopx, Sgcd, and Prss23 are expressed in a very thin deep layer, while Nos1, Kctd4, and Kcnq5 have complementary expression and label most CA3 cells.
“Similarly, in CA3 we identified a set of markers, including St18, Hopx, Sgcd and Prss23, that are expressed in a very thin deep layer, while Nos1, Kctd4, Kcnq5 have complementary expression pattern and label most of the CA3 cells”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGlutamatergic cell types are highly distinct between CTX and HPF regions, but they also have intricate relationships according to the taxonomy tree, UMAP projections, and constellation plots.
“Glutamatergic cell types are highly distinct between CTX and HPF regions, but they also have intricate relationships according to the taxonomy tree, UMAP projections, and constellation plots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn both CA1 and CA3, the top PC corresponded to a dorsal-ventral gradient, validated by ISH images of key genes driving the axis.
“In each case, we observed that the top PC corresponded to a dorsal-ventral (Do-Ve) gradient (Fig. 6F–I), validated by ISH images of the key genes that drive the axis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTshz2 is highly enriched in RSP/ACA across all layers except for cells in the L5/6 NP subclass, which have strong expression of Tshz2 in all regions.
“One exception is Tshz2, which are highly enriched in RSP/ACA across all layers except for cells in L5/6 NP subclass, which have strong expression of Tshz2 in all regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe initial random forest classifier produced a very strong result, but the results were partially driven by donor-specific genes.
“While our initial attempt using random forest classifier produced a very strong result (data not shown), we realized that the results were partially driven by donor-specific genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Donor-specific transcriptional signatures are subtle and do not affect the global clustering results.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataWe selected the top 50 genes in each direction and pooled such genes from all pairwise comparisons with a total of 5,981 gene markers.
“We selected the top 50 genes in each direction and pooled such genes from all pairwise comparisons with a total of 5,981 gene markers (Table S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CA1, Nptx2, Sulf2, and Lpl are expressed in the deep layer, while Pde11a and Anln are expressed in the superficial layer.
“Overall, in CA1, Nptx2, Sulf2, Lpl are expressed in the deep layer, while Pde11a, Anln are in the superficial layer”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis gene set was used to compute the top PC within each subclass and scaled in range [0,1], which corresponds to the Ve-Do axis in all these regions.
“This gene set was used to compute the top PC within each subclass and scaled in range of [0,1] as shown in Fig. S5C, which corresponds to the Ve-Do axis in all these regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGlutamatergic neuronal types are organized by layers and their long-range projection patterns.
“Glutamatergic neuronal types are organized by layers and their long-range projection patterns”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harris and Shepherd, 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationArchicortex and paleocortex are considered evolutionarily older structures, whereas iso/neocortex emerged later and substantially expanded in vertebrate evolution.
“Archicortex and paleocortex are considered evolutionarily older structures, whereas iso/neocortex emerged later and substantially expanded in vertebrate evolution”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rakic, 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe diversity in interareal axon-projection patterns of glutamatergic neurons forms the structural basis of the hierarchical network.
“their tremendous diversity in interareal axon-projection patterns forms the structural basis of the hierarchical network”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationArea specialization is likely a major contributing factor to the diversity of functions supported by cortex.
“This area specialization is likely a major contributing factor to the diversity of functions supported by cortex”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cadwell et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe cortex is partitioned into multiple areas with specific input and output connections with many subcortical and other cortical regions.
“The cortex is partitioned into multiple areas with specific input and output connections with many subcortical and other cortical regions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rakic, 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Essen and Glasser, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDevelopmentally, cortex originates from pallium, a main part of the telencephalon, which can be divided into several parts.
“Developmentally, cortex originates from pallium, a main part of the telencephalon, which can be divided into several parts”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pessoa et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMany molecular, anatomical, and physiological studies have revealed a broad spectrum of neuronal cell types in different cortical and hippocampal regions.
“Many molecular, anatomical, and physiological studies have revealed a broad spectrum of neuronal cell types in different cortical and hippocampal regions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeng and Sanes, 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNeocortical areas form a hierarchical neural network with functionally distinct modules and feedforward and feedback pathways within and between modules.
“these neocortical areas together form a hierarchical neural network with functionally distinct modules and feedforward and feedback pathways both within and between modules”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is a prominent functional transition along the dorsal-ventral axis of HPF, with the dorsal network mainly mediating spatial navigation and the ventral network mainly mediating emotional behaviors.
“there is a prominent functional transition along the dorsal-ventral axis of HPF, with the dorsal network mainly mediating spatial navigation and the ventral network mainly mediating emotional behaviors”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cembrowski and Spruston, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSince isocortical Sst Myh8 and Etv1 cells are L5 Martinotti cells, the HPF Myh8 and Etv1 cells are likely the Martinotti-like oriens lacunosum-moleculare (OLM) cells.
“Since isocortical Sst Myh8 and Etv1 cells are L5 Martinotti cells (Gouwens et al., 2020) (Fig. S1B), the HPF Myh8 and Etv1 cells are likely the Martinotti-like oriens lacunosum-moleculare (OLM) cells (Leao et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious analysis of single-cell transcriptomes defined 133 cell types in two isocortical areas, primary visual cortex (VISp) and anterolateral motor cortex (ALM), in mice, and found that they have shared GABAergic interneuron types but distinct glutamatergic neuron types.
“Previously, we analyzed single-cell transcriptomes to define 133 cell types in two isocortical areas, primary visual cortex (VISp) and anterolateral motor cortex (ALM), in mice (Tasic et al., 2018) and found that they have shared GABAergic interneuron types but distinct glutamatergic neuron types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tasic et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBecause cell isolation aimed toward enrichment for neurons, the study had limited sampling of non-neuronal cells (15,241 10xv2 cells and 1,828 SSv4 cells after QC) and focused on neuronal cell types.
“Since the cell isolation in this study aimed toward enrichment for neurons, we had limited sampling of non-neuronal cells (15,241 10xv2 cells and 1,828 SSv4 cells after QC) and this study is focused on neuronal cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome CGE cell types (e.g., some neurogliaform cells) may be developmentally derived from the nearby preoptic region (PO).
“Note that some of the CGE cell types (e.g., some neurogliaform cells) may, in fact, be developmentally derived from the nearby preoptic region (PO) (Niquille et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Niquille et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMeis2 neurons were identified as related to olfactory bulb interneurons.
“Meis2 neurons were identified as related to olfactory bulb interneurons (Frazer et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frazer et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe distinct subclass of Car3 includes neurons from L6 of many lateral cortical areas, and previous study showed that these Car3+ L6 neurons, like cortical IT neurons, have extensive intracortical axon projections.
“The distinct subclass of Car3, which includes neurons from L6 of many lateral cortical areas, is included here as our previous study showed that these Car3+ L6 neurons, like cortical IT neurons, have extensive intracortical axon projections (Peng et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peng et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNtng1+ cells in HIP may be the trilaminar cells or radiatum-retrohippocampal neurons projecting to RSP.
“may be the trilaminar cells or radiatum-retrohippocampal neurons projecting to RSP”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhile previous studies focused on one or two individual regions, the current taxonomy provides an overview of cell type variation across regions.
“While these studies focused on one or two individual regions, our current taxonomy provides an overview of cell type variation across regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSingle-cell RNA-sequencing studies have systematically characterized and classified cell types in individual regions of isocortex and hippocampus.
“Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies have systematically characterized and classified cell types in individual regions of isocortex and hippocampus”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
Interpretationown dataThey hypothesize that this core set is the core program for dorsal-ventral gradient specification.
“which we hypothesize is the core program for dorsal-ventral gradient specification”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationL2/3 IT CTX Baz1a likely corresponds to a subset of cortical L2/3 neurons that express IEG c-fos under basal conditions and are preferentially interconnected within the L2/3 network.
“likely corresponds to a subset of cortical L2/3 neurons that express IEG c-fos under basal conditions and are preferentially interconnected within the L2/3 network (Yassin et al., 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yassin et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe difference between broad sharing and the previous VISp/ALM finding is reconciled by the finding that transcriptomic cell types are distributed continuously and gradedly across the cortical sheet, often along anterior-posterior (more continuous) and medial-lateral (more discrete) dimensions.
“This difference is reconciled by our finding that these transcriptomic cell types are distributed in a continuous and graded manner across cortical sheet, often along anterior-posterior (more continuous) and medial-lateral (more discrete) dimensions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe effect of transgenic line variation on cell type identities is minimal because nearly all clusters are dominated by 10xv2 cells from Snap25-IRES2-Cre mice, and SSv4 cells mainly came from pan-glutamatergic and pan-GABAergic lines with other specialized Cre lines contributing to only a small fraction of cells.
“Since nearly all clusters are dominated by 10xv2 cells from Snap25-IRES2-Cre mice, and SSv4 cells mainly came from pan-glutamatergic and pan-GABAergic lines with other specialized Cre lines contributing to only a small fraction of cells, the effect of transgenic line variation is minimal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth isocortex and HPF in mammals evolved from the simpler three-layered cortex in reptiles into two parallel "six-layered" circuit organizations, while isocortex further underwent accelerated evolution resulting in multiplication of areas each as an independent circuit unit.
“we suggest that both isocortex and HPF in mammals evolved from the simpler three-layered cortex in reptiles into two parallel “six-layered” circuit organizations, while isocortex further went through accelerated evolution resulting in a multiplication of areas each as an independent circuit unit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThis predicted isocortex-like circuit organization is highly consistent with currently known interareal connections of HPF, providing validation to the transcriptomic cell type framework.
“This prediction is highly consistent with the currently known interareal connections of HPF, providing a level of validation to the transcriptomic cell type framework”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study used mice of both sexes, except that MOp 10xv2 data had only male cells.
“We used mice of both sexes, except that MOp 10xv2 data had only male cells (Methods S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe package performs consensus clustering by repeating the iterative clustering step on 80% subsampled set of cells 100 times, and derives the final clustering result based on cell-cell co-clustering probability matrix.
“The package also performs consensus clustering by repeating the iterative clustering step on 80% subsampled set of cells 100 times, and then derives the final clustering result based on cell-cell co-clustering probability matrix.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenManual microdissections are imperfect, but the dissections still contain substantial enrichment of cells for the targeted regions despite the presence of cells from neighboring regions.
“Note that manual microdissections are imperfect, but despite the presence of cells from neighboring regions, the dissections still contain substantial enrichment of cells for the targeted regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe origin of hippocampal GABAergic neurons from MGE/CGE and their following the same migration streams as isocortical ones may explain the finding that all isocortical GABAergic types are also present in all retrohippocampal regions and most are found in HIP.
“This may explain our finding that all isocortical GABAergic types are also present in all retrohippocampal regions and most of them are found in HIP as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study covered all regions of the cerebral cortex and hippocampal formation, using mid-ontology level sampling with judicious joining of neighboring regions.
“We covered all regions of CTX and HPF and chose sampling at mid-ontology level with judicious joining of neighboring regions (Fig. 1A, Methods S1, Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe scrattch.hicat package features automatic iterative clustering while ensuring all pairs of clusters, even at the finest level, are separable by fairly stringent differential gene expression criteria.
“In addition to the classical single-cell clustering processing steps provided by other tools such as Seurat (Butler et al., 2018), this package features automatic iterative clustering while ensuring all pairs of clusters, even at the finest level, are separable by fairly stringent differential gene expression criteria (Tasic et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tasic et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe sharing of these cell types suggests relatedness of ventral RSP with POST-PRE and of lateral associational cortical areas with ENT.
“suggesting relatedness of these regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenCustom index sets were validated to confirm the same performance as Nextera Index sets before being used on experimental samples.
“Custom index sets were validated to confirm the same performance as Nextera Index sets before being used on experimental samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThis consensus clustering feature enables finetuning of clustering boundaries and assessment of clustering uncertainty.
“This feature enables us to both finetune clustering boundaries and to assess clustering uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRelationships among cell types revealed by adult-stage transcriptomic profiles are likely rooted in developmental and evolutionary processes, and developmental and evolutionary relationships between regions and cell types may be inferred from transcriptomic cell type relationships.
“the above findings suggest that relationships among cell types revealed by the adult-stage transcriptomic profiles are likely rooted in the developmental and evolutionary processes; consequently, developmental and evolutionary relationships between regions and cell types may also be inferred from transcriptomic cell type relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenNo statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size.
“No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe transcriptomic cell type-based molecular architecture of HPF predicts an isocortex-like circuit organization, with IT-like projections from superficial (and deep) layers of ENT and PPP to other HPF regions and within HIP from DG to CA3 to CA1, output projections from PT-like CA1, ProS, and SUB going out of HPF to widespread cortical and subcortical targets, and additional output projections of
“Thus the transcriptomic cell type-based molecular architecture of HPF predicts an isocortex-like circuit organization”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGABAergic interneuron diversity is defined by spatially and temporally precise genetic programming and refined by network interactions.
“Thus, GABAergic interneuron diversity is defined by spatially and temporally precise genetic programming and refined by network interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth intrinsic genetic mechanisms and extrinsic thalamocortical inputs/activity-dependent mechanisms could shape the repertoire and landscape of adult-stage glutamatergic neuron types in isocortex.
“Both processes could shape the repertoire and landscape of adult-stage glutamatergic neuron types in isocortex as seen here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll procedures were carried out in accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols at the Allen Institute for Brain Science.
“All procedures were carried out in accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols at the Allen Institute for Brain Science.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe combination of region-specific cell types and continuous variation of shared cell types across isocortical areas collectively defines cortical areal modularity, providing a molecular basis for cortical modularity revealed in connectivity and brain imaging studies.
“The combination of these region-specific cell types and the continuous variation of shared cell types across isocortical areas collectively defines cortical areal modularity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harris et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe i_harmonize function applies integrative clustering across datasets iteratively while ensuring all clusters at each iteration are separable by conserved DE genes.
“The i_harmonize function, similar to the iter_clust function in the single dataset clustering pipeline, applies the integrative clustering across datasets iteratively while ensuring all clusters at each iteration are separable by conserved DE genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe uniqueness of each isocortical region can be defined by combining all glutamatergic types together, even though individual types often are not confined to single areas.
“Thus, the uniqueness of each region can be defined by combining all glutamatergic types together, even though individual types often are not confined to single areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll genes shown in the heatmap have ISH images from ABA that support their specificity along this axis, with only a subset shown in Figure S5D and Data S1.
“All the genes shown in the heatmap have ISH images from ABA that support their specificity along this axis, with only a subset shown in Figure S5D and Data S1, HPF gradients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataTshz2, a zinc finger homeobox transcription factor predicted to be a transcriptional repressor, could be a master regulator establishing the medial/lateral gradient during cortical development.
“Tshz2, a zinc finger homeobox transcription factor predicted to be a transcriptional repressor, could be a master regulator establishing medial/lateral gradient during cortical development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe KNN classifier was trained on 10xv2 cells and tested on SSv4 cells with no shared donors.
“we trained a KNN classifier using 10xv2 cells and tested on SSv4 cells, with no shared donors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe prediction was based on global transcription signatures conserved across platforms, with no particular genes heavily weighted.
“Therefore, the prediction was based on global transcription signatures that are conserved across platforms, with no particular genes heavily weighted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 10xv2 and SSv4 datasets share conserved global transcriptional signatures that permit cross-platform mapping of regional identity.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningData collection and analyses were not blinded because all experiments followed the same experimental condition.
“Data collection and analyses were not performed blind to the conditions of the experiments as all experiments followed the same experimental condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenNo statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes; sample sizes were similar to those in previous publications.
“No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes, but the sample sizes here are similar to those reported in previous publications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningNo randomization was used during data collection because there was a single experimental condition.
“No randomization was used during data collection as there was a single experimental condition for all acquired data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
A systematic study is needed for a complete picture of the number and distribution of cell types in isocortex and HPF and for understanding how these regions interact with the rest of the brain.
“But a systematic study is needed for a complete picture of the number and distribution of cell types in these regions and for understanding how different cortical and hippocampal regions interact with the rest of the brain and carry out their individual functions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fewer differentially expressed genes between two clusters indicates greater relatedness or similarity.
“the fewer DE genes, the more related”
The paper relies on this without support.
Correlation of gene expression between HPF and CTX clusters indicates homology.
“correlating gene expression for each HPF cell to the average expression of each CTX cluster”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mouse isocortex and hippocampal formation are representative of mammalian isocortex and hippocampal formation.
“our study establishes a molecular architecture of mammalian isocortex and hippocampal formation”
The paper relies on this without support.
Transcriptomic neighborhoods of GABAergic neurons correlate with distinct developmental origins (CGE and MGE).
“The GABAergic inhibitory neuronal class is divided into two neighborhoods that correlate with distinct developmental origins: caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE) (Fig. 2A–E) and medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) (Fig. 2F–J).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The anatomical locations assigned using existing RNA ISH data from the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas and a limited Visium dataset are accurate enough for major cell types.
“we assigned anatomical locations of major cell types (mostly at the supertype level) using existing RNA ISH data from the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas and a limited Visium dataset”
The paper relies on this without support.
The relative proportions estimated from 10xv2 data reflect true proportions of cell types in each region.
“we also provided an estimate of the relative proportions of different cell types in each region using the 10xv2 data”
The paper relies on this without support.
The top principal component computed from a selected gene set faithfully represents the biological axis it is named after (e.g., Pr-Di, Do-Ve, Su-De, activity).
“The top PC based on this set of genes is defined as the CA3 Pr-Di axis”
“defined the pseudo superficial-deep (Su-De) axis as the top PC based on these layer-specific genes”
“computed the top PC based on this gene set as the activity axis”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 10xv2 and SSv4 datasets share conserved global transcriptional signatures that permit cross-platform mapping of regional identity.
“the prediction was based on global transcription signatures that are conserved across platforms”
The paper relies on this without support.
Donor-specific transcriptional signatures are subtle and do not affect the global clustering results.
“While donor-specific transcriptional signatures are subtle and do not affect the global clustering results”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clustering for both 10xv2 and 10xv3 datasets was performed independently using in-house developed R package scrattch.bigcat.
“Clustering for both 10xv2 and 10xv3 datasets was performed independently using the in-house developed R package scrattch.bigcat (v0.0.5, available via github https://github.com/AllenInstitute/scrattch.bigcat), which is a scaled-up version of R package scrattch.hicat23,26 to deal with the increased size of datasets.”
From A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
In STAR METHODS > METHOD DETAILS (page not supplied), the paper says it adapted scrattch.hicat into scrattch.bigcat for the large 10xv2 dataset. Its independent-clustering description instead names SSv4 and 10xv2 and says they used scrattch.hicat; it does not support the claim about independently clustering 10xv3 with scrattch.bigcat. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredACC neurons are a heterogeneous population in terms of both gene expression and projection patterns.
“ACC neurons are a heterogenous population in terms of both gene expression and projection patterns22,23.”
From Dissociable roles of prefrontal plasticity in decision-making strategy and execution of habitual behavior (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
The Results (Comparison of glutamatergic cell types; page unavailable) identify distinct transcriptomic cell types associated with anterior cingulate cortex (ACA), supporting gene-expression heterogeneity. The projection evidence concerns neurons labeled in retrosplenial cortex that project to ACA, and differential projection patterns reported for motor-cortex cells; it does not establish differing projection patterns among ACA neurons. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEntorhinal cortex-specific subtypes clustered separately from neocortical subtypes for the same layers and were often marked by RELN, TOX3 and GPC5, containing lateral (L2 RELN+GPC5+) and medial (L2 TOX3+POSTN+) EC subtypes.
“EC-specific subtypes that clustered separately from neocortical subtypes for the same layers were often marked by expression of RELN, TOX3 and GPC5, and contained subtypes from both the lateral (L2 RELN+GPC5+) and medial (L2 TOX3+POSTN+) EC41–43”
From Single-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
The Results section, “Comparison of glutamatergic cell types between hippocampal formation and isocortex” (page unavailable), identifies distinct layer-2 supertypes in medial and lateral entorhinal cortex. It names them L2 IT ENTm Lef1 and L2 IT ENTl Chn2 (Grik1+), however; the searched passages do not establish the claimed RELN/GPC5 and TOX3/POSTN marker combinations or that these subtypes clustered separately from neocortical subtypes of the same layers. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe NP-CT-L6b-like subclasses emerge as a group highly distinct from the IT-ET-like subclasses, forming two distinct classes, IT-ET Glut and NP-CT-L6b Glut.
“We also observed that the NP–CT–L6b-like (NP, near-projecting; CT, corticothalamic; L6b, layer 6b) subclasses emerge as a group highly distinct from the IT–ET-like (IT, intratelencephalic; ET, extratelencephalic) subclasses13,23,26,27, forming two distinct classes, IT–ET Glut and NP–CT–L6b Glut.”
From A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
The 10xv3 and 10xv2 cells were first clustered separately and then integrated, resulting in an initial joint transcriptomic cell-type taxonomy with 5,283 clusters.
“The 10xv3 and 10xv2 cells were first clustered separately and then integrated with methods we developed previously23, resulting in an initial joint transcriptomic cell-type taxonomy with 5,283 clusters (Extended Data Fig. 1a).”
From A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
The parallel relationships of the different subclasses of glutamatergic neurons between isocortex and HPF that the authors had reported previously extend to other pallium structures-that is, OLF and CTXsp.
“We found that the parallel relationships of the different subclasses of glutamatergic neurons between isocortex and HPF that we had reported previously23 extend to other pallium structures—that is, OLF and CTXsp.”
From A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Prediction of GABAergic subclasses and their spatial location in both directions appears to have more confusions, especially in the Subpallium-GABA neighbourhood, consistent with the more widespread distribution across multiple cortical areas of many GABAergic cell types.
“Notably, the prediction of GABAergic subclasses and their spatial location in both directions appears to have more confusions, especially in the Subpallium-GABA neighbourhood, consistent with the more widespread distribution across multiple cortical areas of many GABAergic cell types23,26.”
From A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Cortical GABAergic cell types are shared across all cortical areas.
“One exception is cortical GABAergic cell types, which are shared across all cortical areas as we previously reported23,26”
From A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
ABI3 has been reported to be a microglia-specific gene using single-cell RNAseq.
“ABI3 has been reported to be a microglia-specific gene using single-cell RNAseq [12, 20].”
From Deletion of Abi3/Gngt2 influences age-progressive amyloid β and tau pathologies in distinctive ways (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
The Results section (‘Generation of the transcriptomic cell type taxonomy’; page unavailable) reports three microglia/perivascular macrophage clusters from single-cell transcriptomic data. It does not identify ABI3 as a microglia-specific gene. Searches for ‘ABI3’ and microglial markers found no passage addressing ABI3 expression or specificity. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSingle-cell data from mouse brain suggests low level expression of Abi3 in microglia.
“Single-cell data from mouse brain suggests low level expression in microglia ([12]; data available from: celltypes.brain-map.org).”
From Deletion of Abi3/Gngt2 influences age-progressive amyloid β and tau pathologies in distinctive ways (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
The Results section (“Generation of the transcriptomic cell type taxonomy”; page unavailable) reports single-cell sampling of mouse-brain microglia, but does not report Abi3 expression or its level. Searches for “Abi3 microglia low expression” and microglial gene-expression data found no passage in our copy establishing the claimed low-level expression. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredApplication of scRNA-seq to the neocortex and other brain regions has revealed a complex but tractable hierarchical organization of transcriptomic cell types consistent overall with anatomical, physiological and developmental studies but with unmatched granularity.
“The application of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to the neocortex and other brain regions has revealed a complex but tractable hierarchical organization of transcriptomic cell types that are consistent overall with knowledge from decades of anatomical, physiological and developmental studies but with an unmatched level of granularity7–11.”
From A multimodal cell census and atlas of the mammalian primary motor cortex (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Transcriptomic cell types are generally shared between MOp and its neighbouring cortical areas.
“We identify a MOp-specific input–output wiring diagram—however, transcriptomic cell types are generally shared between MOp and its neighbouring cortical areas11.”
From A multimodal cell census and atlas of the mammalian primary motor cortex (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
There is coexistence of discrete and continuous variations of cell features across modalities at the lower branch level.
“In this context, another important finding, consistent with and building on multiple other studies9,11,68,69, is the coexistence of discrete and continuous variations of cell features across modalities at the lower branch level.”
From A multimodal cell census and atlas of the mammalian primary motor cortex (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
The thalamic-neocortex separation is conserved in mice and recapitulated in independent single-cell, bulk and microarray data in both mice and humans.
“We found that the thalamic–neocortex separation is conserved in mice and recapitulated both this divide and thalamic marker genes in independent single-cell, bulk and microarray data in both mice and humans8,39,40,43”
From Single-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Thalamic MEIS2+FOXP2+ interneurons shared multiple markers with neocortical GRM3 astrocytes, including GRM3, MEIS2 and VAV3.
“Notably, the thalamic MEIS2+FOXP2+ interneurons shared multiple markers with neocortical GRM3 astrocytes, including GRM3, MEIS2 and VAV339,40,43”
From Single-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Class-level subclass counts omit two subclasses
MinorThe four class counts of 6, 28, 2, and 4 subclasses sum to 40 rather than 42. CR and Meis2 are subsequently identified as neuronal subclasses, but are not accounted for in the stated class breakdown.
Reported 42 · recomputed 40
“Based on this anatomical (both regional and laminar) annotation and prior knowledge, we assigned the 388 clusters into 4 classes, 8 neighborhoods, 42 subclasses, and 101 supertypes.”
Cites
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data
Stuart, T., Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Hafemeister, C., Papalexi, E., Mauck, W. M., Hao, Y., Stoeckius, M., Smibert, P., & Satija, R. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031 · Cited by 15,453 · see citing works
Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E., & Satija, R. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4096 · Cited by 13,174 · see citing works
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N., & Großberger, L. (2018) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00861 · Cited by 9,826 · see citing works
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783 · see citing works
A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain
Madisen, L., Zwingman, T. A., Sunkin, S. M., Oh, S. W., Zariwala, H. A., Gu, H., Ng, L. L., Palmiter, R. D., Hawrylycz, M. J., Jones, A. R., et al. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2467 · Cited by 6,907 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain
Lein, E. S., Hawrylycz, M. J., Ao, N., Ayres, M., Bensinger, A., Bernard, A., Boe, A. F., Boguski, M. S., Brockway, K. S., Byrnes, E. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05453 · Cited by 5,572 · see citing works
Self-citationMcGinnis, C. S., Murrow, L. M., & Gartner, Z. J. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.003 · Cited by 4,521 · see citing works
Software for Computing and Annotating Genomic Ranges
Lawrence, M. F., Huber, W. K., Pagès, H., Aboyoun, P., Carlson, M. R. J., Gentleman, R. C., Morgan, M. T., & Carey, V. J. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118 · Cited by 4,438 · see citing works
Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age
Goldman, P. S., & RAKIC, P. T. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · Cited by 3,412 · see citing works
Specification of Cerebral Cortical Areas
Rakic, P. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3291116 · Cited by 3,127 · see citing works
Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq
Zeisel, A., Muñoz-Manchado, A. B., Codeluppi, S., Lönnerberg, P., La Manno, G., Juréus, A., Marques, S., Munguba, H., He, L., Betsholtz, C., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1934 · Cited by 3,124 · see citing works
Molecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System
Zeisel, A., Hochgerner, H., Lönnerberg, P., Johnsson, A., Memic, F., van der Zwan, J., Häring, M., Braun, E., Borm, L. E., La Manno, G., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021 · Cited by 2,995 · see citing works
A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain
Oh, S. W., Harris, J. A., Ng, L., Winslow, B., Cain, N., Mihalas, S., Wang, Q., Lau, C., Kuan, L., Henry, A. M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13186 · Cited by 2,612 · see citing works
Self-citationGABAergic Interneurons in the Neocortex: From Cellular Properties to Circuits
Tremblay, R., Lee, S., & Rudy, B. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.033 · Cited by 2,033 · see citing works
Molecular diversity and specializations among the cells of the adult mouse brain
Saunders, A., Macosko, E. Z., Wysoker, A., Goldman, M., Krienen, F. M., de Rivera, H., Bien, E., Baum, M., Bortolin, L., Wang, S., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.028 · Cited by 1,847 · see citing works
Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex
Hodge, R. D., Bakken, T. E., Miller, J. A., Smith, K. A., Barkan, E. R., Graybuck, L. T., Close, J. L., Long, B., Johansen, N., Penn, O., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1506-7 · Cited by 1,775 · see citing works
Self-citationShared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areas
Tasic, B., Yao, Z., Graybuck, L. T., Smith, K. A., Nguyen, T. N., Bertagnolli, D., Goldy, J., Garren, E., Economo, M. N., Viswanathan, S., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0654-5 · Cited by 1,746 · see citing works
Self-citationAdult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics
Tasic, B., Menon, V., Nguyen, T. N., Kim, T. K., Jarsky, T., Yao, Z., Levi, B., Gray, L. T., Sorensen, S. A., Dolbeare, T., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4216 · Cited by 1,714 · see citing works
Self-citationThree-dimensional intact-tissue sequencing of single-cell transcriptional states
Wang, X., Allen, W. E., Wright, M. A., Sylwestrak, E. L., Samusik, N., Vesuna, S., Evans, K., Liu, C., Ramakrishnan, C., Liu, J., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat5691 · Cited by 1,620 · see citing works
Chan, K. Y., Jang, M. J., Yoo, B. B., Greenbaum, A., Ravi, N., Wu, W.-L., Sánchez-Guardado, L., Lois, C., Mazmanian, S. K., Deverman, B. E., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4593 · Cited by 1,578 · see citing works
Evolution of the neocortex: a perspective from developmental biology
Rakic, P. (2009) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2719 · Cited by 1,565 · see citing works
The Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework: A 3D Reference Atlas
Wang, Q., Ding, S., Li, Y., Royall, J. J., Feng, D. H., Lesnar, P., Graddis, N., Naeemi, M., Facer, B. A. C., Ho, A., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.007 · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
Self-citationThe neocortical circuit: themes and variations
Harris, K. D., & Shepherd, G. M. G. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3917 · Cited by 1,215 · see citing works
A Designer AAV Variant Permits Efficient Retrograde Access to Projection Neurons
Tervo, D. G. R., Hwang, B., Viswanathan, S., Gaj, T., Lavzin, M., Ritola, K., Lindo, S. E., Michael, S. C., Кулешова, Е. П., Ojala, D. S., et al. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.021 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Adult Neurogenesis in the Hippocampus: From Stem Cells to Behavior
Gonçalves, J. T., Schafer, S. T., & Gage, F. H. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.021 · Cited by 1,122 · see citing works
The anatomy of memory: an interactive overview of the parahippocampal–hippocampal network
van Strien, N. M., Cappaert, N. L. M., & Witter, M. P. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2614 · Cited by 1,041 · see citing works
Neuronal Activity–Induced Gadd45b Promotes Epigenetic DNA Demethylation and Adult Neurogenesis
Dengke, K., Jang, M., Guo, J. U., Kitabatake, Y., Chang, M.-L., Pow-anpongkul, N., Flavell, R. A., Lu, B., Ming, G., & Song, H. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1166859 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
Hippocampal GABAergic Inhibitory Interneurons
Pelkey, K. A., Chittajallu, R., Craig, M. T., Tricoire, L., Wester, J. C., & McBain, C. J. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00007.2017 · Cited by 889 · see citing works
Neuronal cell-type classification: challenges, opportunities and the path forward
Zeng, H., & Sanes, J. R. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.85 · Cited by 841 · see citing works
Daigle, T. L., Madisen, L., Hage, T. A., Valley, M. T., Knoblich, U., Larsen, R. S., Takeno, M. M., Huang, L., Gu, H., Larsen, R., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.035 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Self-citationHierarchical organization of cortical and thalamic connectivity
Harris, J. A., Mihalas, S., Hirokawa, K. E., Whitesell, J. D., Choi, H., Bernard, A., Bohn, P., Caldejon, S., Casal, L., Cho, A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1716-z · Cited by 785 · see citing works
Anatomy of hierarchy: Feedforward and feedback pathways in macaque visual cortex
Markov, N. T., Vezoli, J., Chameau, P., Falchier, A., Quilodran, R., Huissoud, C., Lamy, C., Misery, P., Giroud, P., Ullman, S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.23458 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Development and Functional Diversification of Cortical Interneurons
Lim, L., Mi, D., Llorca, A., & Marín, O. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.009 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Gerfen, C. R., Paletzki, R., & Heintz, N. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.016 · Cited by 647 · see citing works
Survey of spiking in the mouse visual system reveals functional hierarchy
Siegle, J. H., Jia, X., Durand, S., Gale, S. D., Bennett, C., Graddis, N., Heller, G. R., Ramirez, T. K., Choi, H., Luviano, J., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03171-x · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Self-citationArea Patterning of the Mammalian Cortex
O’Leary, D. D. M., Chou, S., & Sahara, S. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.010 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Spatial representation in the hippocampal formation: a history
Moser, E. I., Moser, M.-B., & McNaughton, B. L. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4653 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Integrated Morphoelectric and Transcriptomic Classification of Cortical GABAergic Cells
Gouwens, N. W., Sorensen, S. A., Baftizadeh, F., Budzillo, A., Lee, B. R., Jarsky, T., Alfiler, L., Baker, K., Barkan, E., Berry, K., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.057 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular taxonomy of major neuronal classes in the adult mouse forebrain
Sugino, K., Hempel, C. M., Miller, M. N., Hattox, A. M., Shapiro, P., Wu, C., Huang, Z. J., & Nelson, S. B. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1618 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Minatohara, K., Akiyoshi, M., & Okuno, H. (2016) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2015.00078 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Single-cell analysis of experience-dependent transcriptomic states in the mouse visual cortex
Hrvatin, S., Hochbaum, D. R., Nagy, M. A., Cicconet, M., Robertson, K., Cheadle, L., Zilionis, R., Ratner, A., Borges-Monroy, R., Klein, A. M., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0029-5 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Poulin, J.-F., Caronia, G., Hofer, C., Cui, Q., Helm, B., Ramakrishnan, C., Chan, C. S., Dombeck, D. A., Deisseroth, K., & Awatramani, R. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0203-4 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Distinct descending motor cortex pathways and their roles in movement
Economo, M. N., Viswanathan, S., Tasic, B., Bas, E., Winnubst, J., Menon, V., Graybuck, L. T., Nguyen, T. N., Smith, K. A., Yao, Z., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0642-9 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment and arealization of the cerebral cortex
Cadwell, C. R., Bhaduri, A., Mostajo-Radji, M. A., Keefe, M. G., & Nowakowski, T. J. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.009 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Genomic anatomy of the hippocampus
Thompson, C. L., Pathak, S. D., Jeromin, A., Ng, L. L., MacPherson, C. R., Mortrud, M. T., Cusick, A., Riley, Z. L., Sunkin, S. M., Bernard, A., et al. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.008 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Self-citationPhenotypic variation of transcriptomic cell types in mouse motor cortex
Scala, F., Kobak, D., Bernabucci, M., Bernaerts, Y., Cadwell, C. R., Castro, J. R., Hartmanis, L., Jiang, X., Laturnus, S., Miranda, E., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2907-3 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Self-citationAn integrated transcriptomic and epigenomic atlas of mouse primary motor cortex cell types
Yao, Z., Liu, H., Xie, F., Fischer, S., Booeshaghi, A. S., Adkins, R. S., Aldridge, A. I., Ament, S. A., Pinto-Duarte, A., Bartlett, A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.29.970558 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Self-citationThe promise of spatial transcriptomics for neuroscience in the era of molecular cell typing
Lein, E., Borm, L. E., & Linnarsson, S. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan6827 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex
Glenn Northcutt, R., & Kaas, J. H. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93932-n · Cited by 378 · see citing works
OLM interneurons differentially modulate CA3 and entorhinal inputs to hippocampal CA1 neurons
Leão, R. N., Mikulovic, S., Leão, K. E., Munguba, H., Gezelius, H., Enjin, A., Patra, K., Eriksson, A., Loew, L. M., Tort, A. B. L., et al. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3235 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Spatially resolved transcriptomics adds a new dimension to genomics
Larsson, L., Frisén, J., & Lundeberg, J. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01038-7 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Classes and continua of hippocampal CA1 inhibitory neurons revealed by single-cell transcriptomics
Harris, K. D., Hochgerner, H., Skene, N. G., Magno, L., Katona, L., Bengtsson Gonzales, C., Somogyi, P., Kessaris, N., Linnarsson, S., & Hjerling-Leffler, J. (2018) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006387 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Hierarchical organization of areas in rat visual cortex
Coogan, T. A., & Burkhalter, A. (1993) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-09-03749.1993 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Heterogeneity within classical cell types is the rule: lessons from hippocampal pyramidal neurons
Cembrowski, M. S., & Spruston, N. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0125-5 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Spatially resolved single-cell genomics and transcriptomics by imaging
Zhuang, X. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01037-8 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Mechanisms of Inhibition within the Telencephalon: “Where the Wild Things Are”
Fishell, G., & Rudy, B. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113717 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
An embedded subnetwork of highly active neurons in the neocortex
Yassin, L., Benedetti, B. L., Jouhanneau, J.-S., Wen, J. A., Poulet, J. F. A., & Barth, A. L. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.029 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Bienkowski, M. S., Bowman, I., Song, M. Y., Gou, L., Ard, T., Cotter, K., Zhu, M., Benavidez, N. L., Yamashita, S., Abu-Jaber, J., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0241-y · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Hnasko, T. S., Perez, F. A., Scouras, A. D., Stoll, E. A., Gale, S. D., Luquet, S. H., Phillips, P. E. M., Kremer, E. J., & Palmiter, R. D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0603081103 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Hilar mossy cells of the dentate gyrus: a historical perspective
Scharfman, H. E., & Myers, C. E. (2013) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2012.00106 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Interpretable factor models of single-cell RNA-seq via variational autoencoders
Svensson, V., Gayoso, A., Yosef, N., & Pachter, L. S. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa169 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Cortical interneuron development: a tale of time and space
Hu, J. S., Vogt, D., Sandberg, M., & Rubenstein, J. L. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.132852 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Enhancer viruses for combinatorial cell-subclass-specific labeling
Graybuck, L. T., Daigle, T. L., Sedeño-Cortés, A. E., Walker, M., Kalmbach, B., Lenz, G. H., Morin, E., Nguyen, T. N., Garren, E., Bendrick, J. L., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.03.011 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationNilssen, E. S., Doan, T. P., Nigro, M. J., Ohara, S., & Witter, M. P. (2019) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23145 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Nontoxic, double-deletion-mutant rabies viral vectors for retrograde targeting of projection neurons
Chatterjee, S., Sullivan, H. A., MacLennan, B. J., Xu, R., Hou, Y., Lavin, T. K., Lea, N. E., Michalski, J. E., Babcock, K. R., Dietrich, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0091-7 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Circuit and molecular architecture of a ventral hippocampal network
Gergues, M. M., Han, K. J., Choi, H. S., Brown, B., Clausing, K. J., Turner, V. S., Vainchtein, I. D., Molofsky, A. V., & Kheirbek, M. A. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0705-8 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Parcellating Cerebral Cortex: How Invasive Animal Studies Inform Noninvasive Mapmaking in Humans
Essen, D. C. V., & Glasser, M. F. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.002 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Miyoshi, G., Young, A., Petros, T., Karayannis, T., McKenzie Chang, M., Lavado, A., Iwano, T., Nakajima, M., Taniguchi, H., Huang, Z. J., et al. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1164-15.2015 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Morpho‐physiological criteria divide dentate gyrus interneurons into classes
Hosp, J. A., Strüber, M., Yanagawa, Y., Obata, K., Vida, I., Jonas, P., & Bartos, M. (2014) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22214 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Pessoa, L., Medina, L., Hof, P. R., & Desfilis, E. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.021 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
D'Souza, R. D., Meier, A. M., Bista, P., Wang, Q., & Burkhalter, A. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.19332 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
The subiculum is a patchwork of discrete subregions
Cembrowski, M. S., Wang, L., Lemire, A. L., Copeland, M., DiLisio, S. F., Clements, J., & Spruston, N. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.37701 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Spatially resolved transcriptomics in neuroscience
Close, J. L., Long, B. R., & Zeng, H. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01040-z · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Yuan, M., Meyer, T., Benkowitz, C., Savanthrapadian, S., Ansel-Bollepalli, L., Foggetti, A., Wulff, P., Alcami, P., Elgueta, C., & Bartos, M. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21105 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Ding, S.-L., Yao, Z., Hirokawa, K. E., Nguyen, T. N., Graybuck, L. T., Fong, O., Bohn, P., Ngo, K., Smith, K. A., Koch, C., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107648 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Common cell type nomenclature for the mammalian brain
Miller, J. A., Gouwens, N. W., Tasic, B., Collman, F., van Velthoven, C. T. J., Bakken, T. E., Hawrylycz, M., Zeng, H., Lein, E. S., & Bernard, A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.59928 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationFrazer, S., Prados, J., Niquille, M., Cadilhac, C., Markopoulos, F., Gomez, L., Tomasello, U., Telley, L., Holtmaat, A., Jabaudon, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14219 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Rubin, A. N., & Kessaris, N. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077339 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Evolution of neuronal identity in the cerebral cortex
Tosches, M. A., & Laurent, G. (2019) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.04.009 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Neurogliaform cortical interneurons derive from cells in the preoptic area
Niquille, M., Limoni, G., Markopoulos, F., Cadilhac, C., Prados, J., Holtmaat, A., & Dayer, A. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.32017 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Chawla, M. K., Sutherland, V. L., Olson, K., McNaughton, B. L., & Barnes, C. A. (2018) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22820 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Peng, H., Xie, P., Liu, L., Kuang, X., Wang, Y., Qu, L., Gong, H., Jiang, S., Li, A., Ruan, Z., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/675280 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationFerrante, M., Tahvildari, B., Duque, A., Hadzipasic, M., Salkoff, D. B., Zagha, E., Hasselmo, M. E., & McCormick, D. A. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw143 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Peng, H., Xie, P., Liu, L., et al. (2020) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-84255/v1 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cell2location maps fine-grained cell types in spatial transcriptomics
Kleshchevnikov, V., Shmatko, A., Dann, E., Aivazidis, A., King, H. W., Li, T., Elmentaite, R., Lomakin, A., Kedlian, V., Gayoso, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01139-4 · Cited by 1,279 · see citing works
A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain
Yao, Z., van Velthoven, C. T. J., Kunst, M., Zhang, M., McMillen, D., Lee, C., Jung, W., Goldy, J., Abdelhak, A., Aitken, M., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06812-z · Cited by 1,194 · see citing works
Self-citationA multimodal cell census and atlas of the mammalian primary motor cortex
BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN), BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN) Corresponding authors, Callaway, E. M., Dong, H.-W., Ecker, J. R., Hawrylycz, M. J., Huang, Z. J., Lein, E. S., Ngai, J., Osten, P., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03950-0 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrated Morphoelectric and Transcriptomic Classification of Cortical GABAergic Cells
Gouwens, N. W., Sorensen, S. A., Baftizadeh, F., Budzillo, A., Lee, B. R., Jarsky, T., Alfiler, L., Baker, K., Barkan, E., Berry, K., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.057 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatially resolved cell atlas of the mouse primary motor cortex by MERFISH
Zhang, M., Eichhorn, S. W., Zingg, B., Yao, Z., Cotter, K., Zeng, H., Dong, H., & Zhuang, X. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03705-x · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Self-citationStandardizing workflows in imaging transcriptomics with the abagen toolbox
Markello, R. D., Arnatkevičiūtė, A., Poline, J., Fulcher, B. D., Fornito, A., & Mišić, B. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.72129 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Molecularly defined and spatially resolved cell atlas of the whole mouse brain
Zhang, M., Pan, X., Jung, W., Halpern, A. R., Eichhorn, S. W., Lei, Z., Cohen, L., Smith, K. A., Tasic, B., Yao, Z., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06808-9 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
“4c), consistent with previous findings 22,23 .”
Self-citationWhat is a cell type and how to define it?
Zeng, H. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.031 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Self-citationMorphological diversity of single neurons in molecularly defined cell types
Peng, H., Xie, P., Liu, L., Kuang, X., Wang, Y., Qu, L., Gong, H., Jiang, S., Li, A., Ruan, Z., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03941-1 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease
Mathys, H., Boix, C. A., Akay, L. A., Xia, Z., Davila-Velderrain, J., Ng, A. P., Jiang, X., Abdelhady, G., Galani, K., Mantero, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07606-7 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Danaher, P. J., Kim, Y., Nelson, B., Griswold, M., Yang, Z. G., Piazza, E., & Beechem, J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28020-5 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics: deciphering brain complexity in health and disease
Piwecka, M., Rajewsky, N., & Rybak-Wolf, A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-023-00809-y · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Franjic, D., Skarica, M., Ma, S., Arellano, J. I., Tebbenkamp, A. T. N., Choi, J., Xu, C., Li, Q., Morozov, Y. M., Andrijevic, D., et al. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.036 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
“Nevertheless, there was one DG granule cell subtype that transcriptomically resembled one upper-layer ExN subtype in the EC (Figure 5A), which might recapitulate the similarities found between the HIP and neocortex in the mouse (Yao et al., 2021).”
An atlas of cortical arealization identifies dynamic molecular signatures
Bhaduri, A., Sandoval-Espinosa, C., Otero‐García, M., Oh, I., Yin, R. H., Eze, U. C., Nowakowski, T. J., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03910-8 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Zhang, M. J., Hou, K., Dey, K. K., Sakaue, S., Jagadeesh, K. A., Weinand, K., Taychameekiatchai, A., Rao, P., Pisco, A. O., Zou, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01167-z · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Single-neuron projectome of mouse prefrontal cortex
Gao, L., Liu, S., Gou, L., Hu, Y., Liu, Y., Deng, L., Ma, D., Wang, H., Yang, Q., Chen, Z., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01041-5 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Specialized astrocytes mediate glutamatergic gliotransmission in the CNS
Ceglia, R. D., Ledonne, A., Litvin, D. G., Lind, B. L., Carriero, G., Latagliata, E. C., Bindocci, E., Castro, M. A. D., Savtchouk, I., Vitali, I., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06502-w · Cited by 285 · see citing works
DNA methylation atlas of the mouse brain at single-cell resolution
Liu, H., Zhou, J., Tian, W., Luo, C., Bartlett, A., Aldridge, A., Lucero, J., Osteen, J. K., Nery, J. R., Chen, H., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03182-8 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
BANKSY unifies cell typing and tissue domain segmentation for scalable spatial omics data analysis
Singhal, V., Chou, N., Lee, J., Yue, Y., Liu, J., Chock, W. K., Lin, L., Chang, Y.-C., Teo, E. M. L., Aow, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01664-3 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Multi-omics integration in the age of million single-cell data
Miao, Z., Humphreys, B. D., McMahon, A. P., & Kim, J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-021-00463-x · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Brain endothelial GSDMD activation mediates inflammatory BBB breakdown
Wei, C., Jiang, W., Wang, R., Zhong, H., He, H., Gao, X., Zhong, S., Yu, F., Guo, Q., Zhang, L., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07314-2 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Cerebellar nuclei evolved by repeatedly duplicating a conserved cell-type set
Kebschull, J. M., Richman, E. B., Ringach, N., Friedmann, D., Albarran, E., Kolluru, S. S., Jones, R. C., Allen, W. E., Wang, Y., Cho, S. W., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abd5059 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Single-Cell Sequencing of Brain Cell Transcriptomes and Epigenomes
Armand, E. J., Li, J., Xie, F., Luo, C., & Mukamel, E. A. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.12.010 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Gene regulation by gonadal hormone receptors underlies brain sex differences
Gegenhuber, B., Wu, M. V., Bronstein, R., & Tollkuhn, J. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04686-1 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Spatial atlas of the mouse central nervous system at molecular resolution
Shi, H., He, Y., Zhou, Y., Huang, J., Maher, K., Wang, B., Tang, Z., Luo, S., Tan, P., Wu, M., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06569-5 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Zeng, H., Huang, J., Zhou, H., Meilandt, W. J., Dejanovic, B., Zhou, Y., Bohlen, C. J., Lee, S.-H., Ren, J., Liu, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01251-x · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Brain circuits for pain and its treatment
Lindsay, N. M., Chen, C., Gilam, G., Mackey, S., & Scherrer, G. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abj7360 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Single-cell spatial transcriptome reveals cell-type organization in the macaque cortex
Chen, A., Sun, Y., Lei, Y., Li, C., Liao, S., Meng, J., Bai, Y., Liu, Z., Liang, Z., Zhu, Z., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.06.009 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
“org/atlases-and-data/rnaseq/ mouse-whole-cortex-and-hippocampus-10x.(16) Human and mouse snRNA-seq data for F1 region was retrieved from a previously published cross-species comparison dataset.”
InfluentialA spatially resolved brain region- and cell type-specific isoform atlas of the postnatal mouse brain
Joglekar, A., Prjibelski, A., Mahfouz, A., Collier, P., Lin, S., Schlusche, A. K., Marrocco, J., Williams, S. R., Haase, B., Hayes, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20343-5 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Transcriptomic cytoarchitecture reveals principles of human neocortex organization
Jorstad, N. L., Close, J., Johansen, N., Yanny, A. M., Barkan, E. R., Travaglini, K. J., Bertagnolli, D., Campos, J., Casper, T., Crichton, K., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf6812 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative transcriptomics reveals human-specific cortical features
Jorstad, N. L., Song, J. H. T., Exposito-Alonso, D., Suresh, H., Castro-Pacheco, N., Krienen, F. M., Yanny, A. M., Close, J., Gelfand, E., Long, B., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ade9516 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Shared mechanisms across the major psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases
Wingo, T. S., Liu, Y., Gerasimov, E. S., Vattathil, S. M., Wynne, M. E., Liu, J., Lori, A., Faundez, V., Bennett, D. A., Seyfried, N. T., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31873-5 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
The molecular cytoarchitecture of the adult mouse brain
Langlieb, J., Sachdev, N., Balderrama, K. S., Nadaf, N. M., Raj, M., Murray, E. M., Webber, J. T., Vanderburg, C. R., Gazestani, V., Tward, D. J., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06818-7 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
“1b) when ordered by their best integrated match with a previous cortical atlas 7 , suggesting faithful projection of cell type signatures into spatial coordinates.”
A transcriptomic axis predicts state modulation of cortical interneurons
Bugeon, S., Duffield, J. A. M., Dipoppa, M., Ritoux, A., Prankerd, I., Nicoloutsopoulos, D., Orme, D., Shinn, M., Peng, H., Forrest, H., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04915-7 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
The neuropeptidergic connectome of C. elegans
Ripoll-Sánchez, L., Watteyne, J., Sun, H., Fernandez, R. W., Taylor, S. R., Weinreb, A., Bentley, B. L., Hammarlund, M., Miller, D. M., Hobert, O., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.043 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Geiller, T., Vancura, B., Terada, S., Troullinou, E., Chavlis, S., Tsagkatakis, G., Tsakalides, P., Ócsai, K., Poirazi, P., Rózsa, B. J., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.013 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Developmental mechanisms underlying the evolution of human cortical circuits
Vanderhaeghen, P., & Polleux, F. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-023-00675-z · Cited by 173 · see citing works
A comparative atlas of single-cell chromatin accessibility in the human brain
Li, Y. E., Preissl, S., Miller, M., Johnson, N. D., Wang, Z., Jiao, H., Zhu, C., Wang, Z., Xie, Y., Poirion, O., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf7044 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationRegional, Layer, and Cell-Type-Specific Connectivity of the Mouse Default Mode Network
Whitesell, J. D., Liska, A., Coletta, L., Hirokawa, K. E., Bohn, P., Williford, A., Groblewski, P. A., Graddis, N., Kuan, L., Knox, J. E., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.11.011 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle-cell DNA methylation and 3D genome architecture in the human brain
Tian, W., Zhou, J., Bartlett, A., Zeng, Q., Liu, H., Castanon, R. G., Kenworthy, M., Altshul, J., Valadon, C., Aldridge, A., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf5357 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationZhou, X., Dong, K., & Zhang, S. (2023) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00528-w · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Oligodendrocyte precursor cells ingest axons in the mouse neocortex
Buchanan, J., Elabbady, L., Collman, F., Jorstad, N. L., Bakken, T. E., Ott, C. M., Glatzer, J. C., Bleckert, A., Bodor, Á. L., Brittain, D., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2202580119 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Hippocampal GABAergic interneurons and memory
Tzilivaki, A., Tukker, J. J., Maier, N., Poirazi, P., Sammons, R. P., & Schmitz, D. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.06.016 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
“been defined based on the expressions of Lamp5, Sncg, or vasoactive intestinal peptide-expressing (VIP).(41) Lamp5 interneurons include ivy and neurogliaform cells (NGFCs).”
Vision-dependent specification of cell types and function in the developing cortex
Cheng, S., Butrus, S., Tan, L., Xu, R., Sagireddy, S., Trachtenberg, J. T., Shekhar, K., & Zipursky, S. L. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.022 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Cortical Somatostatin Interneuron Subtypes Form Cell-Type Specific Circuits
Wu, S. J., Sevier, E., Dwivedi, D., Saldi, G.-A., Hairston, A., Yu, S. Q., Abbott, L., Choi, D. H., Sherer, M., Qiu, Y., et al. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.05.032 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Single-cell DNA methylome and 3D multi-omic atlas of the adult mouse brain
Liu, H., Zeng, Q., Zhou, J., Bartlett, A., Wang, B.-A., Berube, P., Tian, W., Kenworthy, M., Altshul, J., Nery, J. R., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06805-y · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“12i and Supplementary Note 5).”
InfluentialSelf-citationGasdermin-E mediates mitochondrial damage in axons and neurodegeneration
Neel, D. V., Basu, H., Gunner, G., Bergstresser, M., Giadone, R. M., Chung, H., Miao, R., Chou, V., Brody, E. M., Jiang, X., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.02.019 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brainPreprint
Yao, Z., van Velthoven, C. T. J., Kunst, M., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.03.06.531121 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationSignature morphoelectric properties of diverse GABAergic interneurons in the human neocortex
Lee, B. R., Dalley, R., Miller, J. A., Chartrand, T., Close, J., Mann, R., Mukora, A., Ng, L., Alfiler, L., Baker, K., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf6484 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationMallach, A., Zielonka, M., van Lieshout, V., An, Y., Khoo, J. H., Vanheusden, M., Chen, W.-T., Moechars, D., Arancibia-Carcamo, I. L., Fiers, M., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114216 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Brain-wide cell-type-specific transcriptomic signatures of healthy ageing in mice
Jin, K., Yao, Z., van Velthoven, C. T. J., Kaplan, E. S., Glattfelder, K. J., Barlow, S. T., Boyer, G., Carey, D., Casper, T., Chakka, A. B., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08350-8 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrative spatial analysis of cell morphologies and transcriptional states with MUSE
Bao, F., Deng, Y. C., Wan, S., Shen, S. Q., Wang, B., Dai, Q., Altschuler, S. J., & Wu, L. F. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01251-z · Cited by 115 · see citing works
SPACEL: deep learning-based characterization of spatial transcriptome architectures
Xu, H., Wang, S., Fang, M., Luo, S., Chen, C., Wan, S., Wang, R., Tang, M., Xue, T., Li, B., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43220-3 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“Collectively, for all 56 cell types 52,53 in all 12 ST slices, the average AS of Spoint ( =0.60) was again higher than those of the other methods (average AS =0.30 – 0.48; Fig.”
InfluentialCell-type profiling in salamanders identifies innovations in vertebrate forebrain evolution
Woych, J., Gurrola, A. O., Deryckere, A., Jaeger, E. C. B., Gumnit, E., Merello, G., Gu, J., Joven, A., Leigh, N. D., Yun, M. H., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abp9186 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Spatially resolved mapping of cells associated with human complex traits
Song, L., Chen, W., Hou, J., Guo, M., & Yang, J. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08757-x · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Optimizing Xenium In Situ data utility by quality assessment and best-practice analysis workflows
Salas, S. M., Kuemmerle, L. B., Langseth, C. M., Tiesmeyer, S., Avenel, C., Hu, T., Rehman, H., Grillo, M., Czarnewski, P., Helgadóttir, S., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02617-2 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Genome-wide spatial expression profiling in formalin-fixed tissues
Gracia Villacampa, E., Larsson, L., Mirzazadeh, R., Kvastad, L., Andersson, A., Mollbrink, A., Kokaraki, G., Monteil, V., Schultz, N., Appelberg, K. S., et al. (2021) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2021.100065 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Single-nuclei isoform RNA sequencing unlocks barcoded exon connectivity in frozen brain tissue
Hardwick, S. A., Hu, W., Joglekar, A., Fan, L., Collier, P. G., Foord, C., Balacco, J., Lanjewar, S., Sampson, M. M., Koopmans, F., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01231-3 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Patch-seq: Past, Present, and Future
Lipovsek, M., Bardy, C., Cadwell, C. R., Hadley, K., Kobak, D., & Tripathy, S. J. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1653-20.2020 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Molecular diversity and evolution of neuron types in the amniote brain
Hain, D., Gallego‐Flores, T., Klinkmann, M., Macias, A., Ciirdaeva, E., Arends, A., Thum, C., Tushev, G., Kretschmer, F., Tosches, M. A., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abp8202 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Pfau, S. J., Langen, U. H., Fisher, T. M., Prakash, I., Nagpurwala, F., Lozoya, R. A., Lee, W.-C. A., Wu, Z., & Gu, C. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01743-y · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Imaging transcriptomics of brain disorders
Arnatkeviciute, A., Fulcher, B. D., Bellgrove, M. A., & Fornito, A. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.10.002 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Neuronal types in the mouse amygdala and their transcriptional response to fear conditioning
Hochgerner, H., Singh, S., Tibi, M., Lin, Z., Skarbianskis, N., Admati, I., Ophir, O., Reinhardt, N., Netser, S., Wagner, S., et al. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01469-3 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Whole-brain comparison of rodent and human brains using spatial transcriptomics
Beauchamp, A., Yee, Y., Darwin, B. C., Raznahan, A., Mars, R. B., & Lerch, J. P. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.79418 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Single-cell analysis of chromatin accessibility in the adult mouse brain
Zu, S., Li, Y. E., Wang, K., Armand, E. J., Mamde, S., Amaral, M. L., Wang, Y., Chu, A., Xie, Y., Miller, M., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06824-9 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationOptimized ultrasound neuromodulation for non-invasive control of behavior and physiology
Murphy, K. R., Farrell, J. S., Bendig, J., Mitra, A., Luff, C., Stelzer, I. A., Yamaguchi, H., Angelakos, C. C., Choi, M., Bian, W.-J., et al. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.07.002 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Spatially exploring RNA biology in archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues
Bai, Z., Zhang, D., Gao, Y. P., Tao, B., Zhang, D., Bao, S., Enninful, A., Wang, Y., Li, H., Su, G., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.001 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Iterative single-cell multi-omic integration using online learning
Gao, C., Liu, J., Kriebel, A. R., Preißl, S., Luo, C., Castanon, R., Sandoval, J. P., Rivkin, A. C., Nery, J. R., Behrens, M. M., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00867-x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Hippocampo-cortical circuits for selective memory encoding, routing, and replay
Harvey, R. E., Robinson, H. L., Liu, C., Oliva, A., & Fernandez-Ruiz, A. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.015 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Miyoshi, E., Morabito, S., Henningfield, C. M., Das, S., Rahimzadeh, N., Shabestari, S. K., Michael, N., Emerson, N., Reese, F., Shi, Z., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01961-x · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Learning interpretable cellular and gene signature embeddings from single-cell transcriptomic data
Zhao, Y., Cai, H., Zhang, Z., Tang, J., & Li, Y. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25534-2 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Psilocybin’s lasting action requires pyramidal cell types and 5-HT2A receptors
Shao, L.-X., Liao, C., Davoudian, P. A., Savalia, N. K., Jiang, Q., Wojtasiewicz, C., Tan, D., Nothnagel, J. D., Liu, R., Woodburn, S. C., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08813-6 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Neural heterogeneity controls computations in spiking neural networks
Gast, R., Solla, S. A., & Kennedy, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2311885121 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
DropletQC: improved identification of empty droplets and damaged cells in single-cell RNA-seq data
Muskovic, W., & Powell, J. E. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02547-0 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Long-term stability of cortical ensembles
Pérez-Ortega, J., Alejandre-García, T., & Yuste, R. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.64449 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Emerging roles of oligodendrocyte precursor cells in neural circuit development and remodeling
Buchanan, J., da Costa, N. M., & Cheadle, L. (2023) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2023.05.007 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“Finally, OPCs express genes that encode mediators of phagocytosis, further supporting a role in synaptic engulfment [45,50].”
Common cell type nomenclature for the mammalian brain
Miller, J. A., Gouwens, N. W., Tasic, B., Collman, F., van Velthoven, C. T. J., Bakken, T. E., Hawrylycz, M., Zeng, H., Lein, E. S., & Bernard, A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.59928 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationShen, R., Liu, L., Wu, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, Z., Guo, J., Yang, F., Zhang, C., Chen, B., Feng, W., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35288-0 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Dense functional and molecular readout of a circuit hub in sensory cortex
Condylis, C., Ghanbari, A., Manjrekar, N., Bistrong, K., Yao, S., Yao, Z., Nguyen, T. N., Zeng, H., Tasic, B., & Chen, J. L. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl5981 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationTemporal controls over inter-areal cortical projection neuron fate diversity
Klingler, E., Tomasello, U., Prados, J., Kebschull, J. M., Contestabile, A., Galiñanes, G. L., Fièvre, S., Santinha, A. J., Platt, R. J., Huber, D., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04048-3 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
CellDART: cell type inference by domain adaptation of single-cell and spatial transcriptomic data
Bae, S., Na, K. J., Koh, J., Lee, D. S., Choi, H., & Kim, Y. T. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac084 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Peng, D., Gui, Z., Wang, D., Ma, Y., Huang, Z., Zhou, Y., & Wu, H. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33136-9 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Evolution of glutamatergic signaling and synapses
Moroz, L. L., Nikitin, M. A., Poličar, P. G., Kohn, A. B., & Romanova, D. Y. (2021) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108740 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Farsi, Z., Nicolella, A. A., Simmons, S., Aryal, S., Shepard, N., Brenner, K. S., Lin, S., Herzog, L. E., Moran, S. P., Stalnaker, K. J., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.08.004 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Folding brains: from development to disease modeling
Del-Valle-Anton, L., & Borrell, V. (2021) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00016.2021 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Inferring neuron-neuron communications from single-cell transcriptomics through NeuronChat
Zhao, W., Johnston, K. G., Ren, H., Xu, X., & Nie, Q. H. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36800-w · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Neural circuit basis of placebo pain relief
Chen, C., Niehaus, J. K., Dinç, F., Huang, K. L., Barnette, A. L., Tassou, A., Shuster, S. A., Wang, L., Lemire, A. L., Menon, V., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07816-z · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Spatial transcriptomics reveals molecular dysfunction associated with cortical Lewy pathology
Goralski, T. M., Meyerdirk, L. K., Breton, L., Brasseur, L., Kurgat, K., DeWeerd, D., Turner, L., Becker, K., Adams, M., Newhouse, D., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47027-8 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
A comprehensive comparison on cell-type composition inference for spatial transcriptomics data
Chen, J., Liu, W., Luo, T., Yu, Z., Jiang, M.-Z., Wen, J., Gupta, G. P., Giusti‐Rodríguez, P., Hongtu Zhu, B., Yang, Y., et al. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac245 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
A genetically defined insula-brainstem circuit selectively controls motivational vigor
Deng, H., Xiao, X., Yang, T., Ritola, K., Hantman, A., Li, Y., Huang, Z. J., & Li, B. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.019 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Moreau, M. X., Saillour, Y., Cwetsch, A. W., Pierani, A., & Causeret, F. (2021) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.197962 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Cell-type-specific inhibitory circuitry from a connectomic census of mouse visual cortexPreprint
Schneider-Mizell, C. M., Bodor, Á. L., Brittain, D., Buchanan, J., Bumbarger, D. J., Elabbady, L., Gamlin, C. R., Kapner, D., Kinn, S., Mahalingam, G., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.01.23.525290 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Leveraging the Cell Ontology to classify unseen cell types
Wang, S., Pisco, A. O., McGeever, A., Brbić, M., Žitnik, M., Darmanis, S., Leskovec, J., Karkanias, J., & Altman, R. B. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25725-x · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Rop, F. V. D., Ismail, J. N., González‐Blas, C. B., Hulselmans, G. J., Flerin, C., Janssens, J., Theunis, K., Christiaens, V., Wouters, J., Marcassa, G., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.73971 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Neurodevelopmental disorders—high-resolution rethinking of disease modeling
Khodosevich, K., & Sellgren, C. M. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01876-1 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Single substitution in H3.3G34 alters DNMT3A recruitment to cause progressive neurodegeneration
Khazaei, S., Chen, C. C. L., Andrade, A. F., Kabir, N., Azarafshar, P., Morcos, S. M., França, J. A., Lopes, M. D. C., Lund, P. J., Danieau, G., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.02.023 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Dissociable Roles of Pallidal Neuron Subtypes in Regulating Motor Patterns
Cui, Q., Pamukcu, A., Cherian, S., Chang, I. Y. M., Berceau, B. L., Xenias, H. S., Higgs, M. H., Rajamanickam, S., Chen, Y., Du, X., et al. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2210-20.2021 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Zhang, X., Wang, X., Shivashankar, G. V., & Uhler, C. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35233-1 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Xie, Y. R., Castro, D. C., Rubakhin, S. S., Trinklein, T. J., Sweedler, J. V., & Lam, F. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02171-3 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yao, Z., van Velthoven, C. T. J., Nguyen, T. N., Goldy, J., Sedeno-Cortes, A. E., Baftizadeh, F., Bertagnolli, D., Casper, T., Chiang, M., Crichton, K., Ding, S.-L., Fong, O., Garren, E., Glandon, A., Gouwens, N. W., Gray, J., Graybuck, L. T., Hawrylycz, M. J., Hirschstein, D., Kroll, M., Lathia, K., Lee, C., Levi, B., McMillen, D., Mok, S., Pham, T., Ren, Q., Rimorin, C., Shapovalova, N., Sulc, J., Sunkin, S. M., Tieu, M., Torkelson, A., Tung, H., Ward, K., Dee, N., Smith, K. A., Tasic, B., & Zeng, H.
- Affiliations
- Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zeng, Hongkui
- ORCID
- Yao, Zizhen
- Nguyen, Thuc Nghi
- Goldy, Jeff
- Baftizadeh, Fahimeh
- Bertagnolli, Darren
- Casper, Tamara
- Chiang, Megan
- Crichton, Kirsten
- Ding, Song-Lin
- Fong, Olivia
- Glandon, Alexandra
- Gouwens, Nathan W.
- Graybuck, Lucas T.
- Hawrylycz, Michael J.
- Hirschstein, Daniel
- Kroll, Matthew
- Lathia, Kanan
- Lee, Changkyu
- Levi, Boaz
- McMillen, Delissa
- Mok, Stephanie
- Ren, Qingzhong
- Rimorin, Christine
- Shapovalova, Nadiya
- Sunkin, Susan M.
- Tieu, Michael
- Torkelson, Amy
- Tung, Herman
- Ward, Katelyn
- Dee, Nick
- Smith, Kimberly A.
- Tasic, Bosiljka
- Zeng, Hongkui
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3222-3241.e26
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8195859
- OpenAlex
- W3162218953
- Semantic Scholar
- c60f04ef990c1f8b8d4c22e7ace44a70cc4bca3f
- Cited by
- 1,065
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 189 · 2025: 223 · 2024: 243 · 2023: 186 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 50.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 374 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- neocortex, hippocampal formation, glutamatergic neurons, GABAergic neurons, neuronal cell types, subiculum, mouse brain, single-cell transcriptomics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Hippocampus, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Glutamic Acid, Neocortex, Mice, GABAergic Neurons, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review