The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A spike sorting toolbox for up to thousands of electrodes validated with ground truth recordings in vitro and in vivo
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, multielectrode arrays and large silicon probes have been developed to record simultaneously between hundreds and thousands of electrodes packed with a high density. However, they require novel methods to extract the spiking activity of large ensembles of neurons. Here, we developed a new toolbox to sort spikes from these large-scale extracellular data. To validate our method, we performed simultaneous extracellular and loose patch recordings in rodents to obtain ‘ground truth’ data, where the solution to this sorting problem is known for one cell. The performance of our algorithm was always close to the best expected performance, over a broad range of signal-to-noise ratios, in vitro and in vivo. The algorithm is entirely parallelized and has been successfully tested on recordings with up to 4225 electrodes. Our toolbox thus offers a generic solution to sort accurately spikes for up to thousands of electrodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries
Mallat, S. G., & Zhang, Z. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.258082 · Cited by 9,112
Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks
Rodriguez, A., & Laio, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1242072 · Cited by 4,942
Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering
Quiroga, R. Q., Nadasdy, Z., & Ben-Shaul, Y. (2004) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976604774201631 · Cited by 2,119
Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles
Buzsáki, G. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1233 · Cited by 1,875
Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers
Buzsáki, G. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.023 · Cited by 1,289
Harris, K. D., Henze, D. A., Csicsvari, J., Hirase, H., & Buzsáki, G. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.401 · Cited by 1,151
Intracellular Features Predicted by Extracellular Recordings in the Hippocampus In Vivo
Henze, D. A., Borhegyi, Z., Csicsvari, J., Mamiya, A., Harris, K. D., & Buzsáki, G. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.390 · Cited by 942
Tungsten Microelectrode for Recording from Single Units
Hubel, D. H. (1957) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.125.3247.549 · Cited by 849
Spike sorting for large, dense electrode arrays
Rossant, C., Kadir, S. N., Goodman, D. F. M., Schulman, J., Hunter, M. L. D., Saleem, A. B., Grosmark, A., Belluscio, M., Denfield, G. H., Ecker, A. S., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4268 · Cited by 785
Kilosort: realtime spike-sorting for extracellular electrophysiology with hundreds of channels
Pachitariu, M., Steinmetz, N., Kadir, S., Carandini, M., & Kenneth D., H. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/061481 · Cited by 740
Cited by
A Fully Automated Approach to Spike Sorting
Chung, J. E., Magland, J. F., Barnett, A. H., Tolosa, V. M., Tooker, A. C., Lee, K. Y., Shah, K. G., Felix, S. H., Frank, L. M., & Greengard, L. F. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.030 · Cited by 490
Behavior needs neural variability
Waschke, L., Kloosterman, N. A., Obleser, J., & Garrett, D. D. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.023 · Cited by 308
The neurons that restore walking after paralysis
Kathe, C., Skinnider, M. A., Hutson, T. H., Regazzi, N., Gautier, M., Demesmaeker, R., Komi, S., Ceto, S., James, N. D., Cho, N., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05385-7 · Cited by 304
Luan, L., Robinson, J. T., Aazhang, B., Chi, T., Yang, K., Li, X., Rathore, H., Singer, A., Yellapantula, S., Fan, Y., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.011 · Cited by 150
Williams, A. H., Poole, B., Maheswaranathan, N., Dhawale, A. K., Fisher, T., Wilson, C. D., Brann, D. H., Trautmann, E. M., Ryu, S., Shusterman, R., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.020 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Yger, P., Spampinato, G. L., Esposito, E., Lefebvre, B., Deny, S., Gardella, C., Stimberg, M., Jetter, F., Zeck, G., Picaud, S., Duebel, J., & Marre, O.
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2018-03-20
- Volume
- 7
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2791680029
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 14.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A spike sorting toolbox for up to thousands of electrodes validated with ground truth recordings in vitro and in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7554/elife.34518
- The paper
- Yger, P., Spampinato, G. L., Esposito, E., Lefebvre, B., Deny, S., Gardella, C., Stimberg, M., Jetter, F., Zeck, G., Picaud, S., Duebel, J., & Marre, O. (2018). A spike sorting toolbox for up to thousands of electrodes validated with ground truth recordings in vitro and in vivo. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.34518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
