Pathway dynamics can delineate the sources of transcriptional noise in gene expression
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Single-cell expression profiling opens up new vistas on cellular processes. Extensive cell-to-cell variability at the transcriptomic and proteomic level has been one of the stand-out observations. Because most experimental analyses are destructive we only have access to snapshot data of cellular states. This loss of temporal information presents significant challenges for inferring dynamics, as well as causes of cell-to-cell variability. In particular, we typically cannot separate dynamic variability from within cells (‘intrinsic noise’) from variability across the population (‘extrinsic noise’). Here, we make this non-identifiability mathematically precise, allowing us to identify new experimental set-ups that can assist in resolving this non-identifiability. We show that multiple generic reporters from the same biochemical pathways (e.g. mRNA and protein) can infer magnitudes of intrinsic and extrinsic transcriptional noise, identifying sources of heterogeneity. Stochastic simulations support our theory, and demonstrate that ‘pathway-reporters’ compare favourably to the well-known, but often difficult to implement, dual-reporter method.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · see citing works
Generalizing RNA velocity to transient cell states through dynamical modeling
Bergen, V., Lange, M., Peidli, S., Wolf, F. A., & Theis, F. J. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0591-3 · Cited by 2,951 · see citing works
Taniguchi, Y., Choi, P. J., Li, G.-W., Chen, H., Babu, M., Hearn, J., Emili, A., & Xie, X. S. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188308 · Cited by 1,982 · see citing works
Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells
Raj, A., Peskin, C. S., Tranchina, D., Vargas, D. Y., & Tyagi, S. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040309 · Cited by 1,737 · see citing works
Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks
Thattai, M., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.151588598 · Cited by 1,428 · see citing works
Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression
Raser, J. M., & O'Shea, E. K. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098641 · Cited by 1,425 · see citing works
A combined approach for single-cell mRNA and intracellular protein expression analysis
Reimegård, J., Tarbier, M., Danielsson, M., Schuster, J., Baskaran, S., Panagiotou, S., Dahl, N., Friedländer, M. R., & Gallant, C. J. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02142-w · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Cell-cycle dependence of transcription dominates noise in gene expression
Zopf, C. J., Quinn, K., Zeidman, J., & Maheshri, N. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003161 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Ham, L., Jackson, M., & Stumpf, M. P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ham, Lucy
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2021-10-12
- Volume
- 10
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8608387
- OpenAlex
- W3206063748
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Melbourne (DRM)
- Volkswagen Foundation (93 062)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
- Keywords
- transcriptional noise, intrinsic noise, extrinsic noise, cell-to-cell variability, non-identifiability, single-cell expression profiling, gene expression dynamics, stochastic gene expression
- MeSH terms
- Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression Profiling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review