Cited by 2,009Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells

Open access
Taniguchi, Yuichi, Choi, Paul J., Li, Gene-Wei, Chen, Huiyi, Babu, Mohan, Hearn, Jeremy, Emili, Andrew, Xie, X. Sunney·2010·Science

Abstract

Devil in the Detail: Genetically identical cells in the same environment can show variation in gene expression that may cause phenotypic variation at the single-cell level. But how noisy are most genes? Taniguchi et al. (p. 533 ; see the Perspective by Tyagi ) now report single-cell global profiling of both messenger RNA (mRNA) and proteins in Escherichia coli using a yellow fluorescent protein fusion library. As well as a common extrinsic noise in high-abundance proteins, large fluctuations were observed in low-abundance proteins. Remarkably, in single-cell experiments, mRNA and protein levels for the same gene were uncorrelated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1188308

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

5 of 34 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    In genetically identical bacterial populations, protein and mRNA copy numbers differ between individual cells.

    “Such stochasticity is manifested in fluctuations of mRNA and protein copy numbers within a cell lineage over time, and in variations of mRNA and protein copy numbers among a population of genetically identical cells at a particular time (1, 2, 3, 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
    • cites [2] source

      The Abstract says stochastic gene expression can produce variation among identical cells, and its model predicts cell-to-cell variability in mRNA levels for both eukaryotic and prokaryotic promoters. However, the paper's single-cell protein-reporter measurements were made in yeast, not bacteria; it does not establish that both protein and mRNA copy numbers differ among individual bacterial cells. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [3] source
  • Study design and conductown data

    Single-molecule sensitivity of the imaging was confirmed by abrupt photobleaching of membrane-bound YFPs expressed at low level.

    “Single molecule sensitivity was confirmed by abrupt photobleaching of membrane-bound YFPs expressed at low level (Fig. S14) (8, 18, 23).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] source
    • cites [18] source
    • cites [23] source

      The Results and discussion passage on deletion-mutant verification describes PCR checks, while Materials and methods > Growth tests describes absorbance measurements; neither addresses single-molecule imaging. Searches for photobleaching, membrane-bound YFP, and fluorescence imaging found no passage confirming the claimed sensitivity test. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    E. coli proteins generally had larger noise and Fano factors than yeast proteins, even for proteins present at similar copy numbers.

    “We found that E. coli proteins generally had larger noise and Fano factors than yeast proteins, even for those present at similar copy numbers (Fig. S6) (18).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] source
  • Findingown data

    In a single cell, mRNA and protein levels for the same gene are completely uncorrelated.

    “Furthermore, we found that in a single cell mRNA and protein levels for the same gene are completely uncorrelated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    The protein distributions for 1,009 out of 1,018 strains can be well fit by the gamma distribution.

    “The distributions for 1,009 out of the 1,018 strains can be well fit by the gamma distribution, Eq. 2 (Fig. S20) (18).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] source
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Single-molecule fluorescence microscopy has counted mRNA or protein molecules in individual cells, especially bacteria, but only for a limited number of specific genes.

    “In recent years, single-molecule fluorescence microscopy has been used to count mRNA (12-16) or protein (8, 17) molecules in individual cells, especially in bacteria. However, these methods have only been applied to limited number of specific genes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [12] source
    • cites [13] source
    • cites [14] source
    • cites [15] source
    • cites [16] source
    • cites [8] source
    • cites [17] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At higher expression levels (>10 molecules per cell), protein noise reaches a plateau of ~0.1 and does not decrease further, suggesting each protein has at least 30% variation in expression level.

    “In contrast, at higher expression levels (>10 molecules per cell), the noise reaches a plateau of ∼0.1 and does not decrease further, suggesting that each protein has at least 30% variation in its expression level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The noise floor does not result from cell size effects or measurement noise.

    “We found that the noise floor does not result from cell size effects, nor did it arise from measurement noise (18).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The study discovered large fluctuations in low abundance proteins and a common extrinsic noise in high abundance proteins.

    “We discovered large fluctuations in low abundance proteins as well as a common extrinsic noise in high abundance proteins.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The transcription and translation rates a and b have static or slowly varying heterogeneous distributions f(a) and g(b) across cells.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Extrinsic noise is global to all high expression genes, demonstrated by statistically significant correlations between expression levels of 13 pairs of randomly selected genes.

    “We further demonstrate that the extrinsic noise is global to all high expression genes by analyzing the correlations between expression levels of 13 pairs of randomly selected genes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The transcription and translation rates a and b have static or slowly varying heterogeneous distributions f(a) and g(b) across cells.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    The prevalence of proteins with very low copy number suggests that single-molecule experiments are necessary for bacteriology.

    “The prevalence of proteins with very low copy number suggests that single-molecule experiments are necessary for bacteriology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This result highlights the disconnect between proteome and transcriptome analyses of a single cell and the need for single-cell proteome analysis.

    “This striking result highlights the disconnect between proteome and transcriptome analyses of a single cell, as well as the need for single cell proteome analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A fluorescent protein reporter library in S. cerevisiae has been extremely useful for protein profiling.

    “A fluorescent protein reporter library of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (9) has proven to be extremely useful in protein profiling (10, 11).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] source
    • cites [10] source
    • cites [11] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The result offers a cautionary note in interpreting single-cell transcriptome analysis and argues for the necessity of single-cell proteome analysis.

    “However, our result offers a cautionary note in interpreting single-cell transcriptome analysis and argues for the necessity for single cell proteome analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The additional noise is attributed to extrinsic noise, i.e., slow variation of a and b, confirmed by real-time observation of protein levels for four randomly selected high-copy strains.

    “We attribute the additional noise to extrinsic noise (3), that is the slow variation of the values of a and b, which we confirm with real time observation of protein levels for four randomly selected high copy library strains.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] source
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The transcription and translation rates a and b have static or slowly varying heterogeneous distributions f(a) and g(b) across cells.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Given that some proteins and most mRNAs of functional genes are present at low copy numbers in a bacterial cell, single-molecule sensitivity is necessary for understanding stochastic gene expression and regulation.

    “Given that some proteins and most mRNAs of functional genes are present at low copy numbers in a bacterial cell, the single molecule sensitivity afforded by our measurements is necessary for the understanding of stochastic gene expression and regulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In E. coli, mRNA is typically degraded within minutes, whereas most proteins, including fluorescent proteins, have a lifetime longer than the cell cycle.

    “In E. coli, mRNA is typically degraded within minutes (Table S6) (18), whereas most proteins, including fluorescent proteins, have a lifetime longer than the cell cycle (34).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [18] source
    • cites [34]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Of 1,400 attempted strains, 1,018 YFP fusion strains were confirmed by sequencing and had no significant growth defects.

    “Out of the 1,400 strains attempted, 1,018 strains were confirmed by sequencing and showed no significant growth defects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The same FISH probe was used for all strains, so optimized hybridization efficiency is unbiased for every measured gene.

    “Because the same probe is used for all strains, the optimized hybridization efficiency is unbiased for every measured gene (18).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior single-cell mRNA profiling methods lacked single-molecule sensitivity and are unsuitable for bacteria, which have low mRNA copy numbers.

    “While single cell mRNA profiling has been carried out with cDNA microarray (6) and mRNA-seq (7), these studies did not have single molecule sensitivity and are not suitable for bacteria, which express mRNA at low copy numbers (8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [6] source
    • cites [7] source
    • cites [8] source
15 of 15
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Gene expression dynamics follow a kinetic scheme with transcription, translation, mRNA degradation, and protein degradation rates.

    “We consider the kinetic scheme”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The transcription and translation rates a and b have static or slowly varying heterogeneous distributions f(a) and g(b) across cells.

    “Assuming that there exist static or slowly varying heterogeneities of a and b, with distributions f (a) and g(b), respectively, the protein distribution is”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stochastic simulations are necessary when reactions involving few particles such as those in genetic information processing and the charging of the tRNAs can lead to large variations in the state of the cell.

    “Stochastic simulations are necessary when reactions involving few particles such as those in genetic information processing and the charging of the tRNAs can lead to large variations in the state of the cell (Taniguchi et al., 2010).”

    From Fundamental behaviors emerge from simulations of a living minimal cell (2022) · cites this paper as Taniguchi et al., 2010

    The Conclusion (page not specified) reports that some proteins and most mRNAs occur at low copy numbers in E. coli and that low-abundance proteins show large fluctuations. The paper supports the claim about stochastic variation in gene expression, but does not establish that stochastic simulations are necessary or address tRNA charging. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • mRNA abundance is not always a faithful proxy of protein expression across various organisms.

    “Although transcriptomic profiling has provided insights into Tex cell biology, mRNA abundance is not always a faithful proxy of protein expression across various organisms18–22.”
  • This finding contrasts with data from bacteria where productive protein expression is achieved with such low mRNA concentrations.

    “This finding contrasts with data from bacteria where productive protein expression is achieved with such low mRNA concentrations (Taniguchi et al., 2010).”
  • These methods hold promise for elucidating the epigenetic controls of cellular identity.

    “These methods hold promise for elucidating the epigenetic controls of cellular identity186,187.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taniguchi, Y., Choi, P. J., Li, G.-W., Chen, H., Babu, M., Hearn, J., Emili, A., & Xie, X. S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Taniguchi, Yuichi
  • Choi, Paul J.
  • Li, Gene-Wei
  • Chen, Huiyi
  • Xie, X. Sunney
Venue
Science
Published
2010-07-30
Volume
329
Issue
5991
Pages
533-538
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2053460598
Cited by
1,982
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 122 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 153 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 158 · 2015: 157 · 2014: 156 · 2013: 171 · 2012: 161
FWCI
60.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD000277)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (77639_1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Escherichia coli, single-cell proteomics, single-cell transcriptomics, gamma distribution, transcription rate, extrinsic noise, intrinsic noise, mRNA-protein correlation, gene expression variation
MeSH terms
Escherichia coli, Luminescent Proteins, Microscopy, Fluorescence, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Messenger, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Gene Library, Gene Expression, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Proteome, Gene Expression Profiling, RNA Stability, Escherichia coli Proteins, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review