Conformational and oligomeric states of SPOP from small-angle X-ray scattering and molecular dynamics simulations
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) is a substrate adaptor in the ubiquitin proteasome system, and plays important roles in cell-cycle control, development, and cancer pathogenesis. SPOP forms linear higher-order oligomers following an isodesmic self-association model. Oligomerization is essential for SPOP’s multivalent interactions with substrates, which facilitate phase separation and localization to biomolecular condensates. Structural characterization of SPOP in its oligomeric state and in solution is, however, challenging due to the inherent conformational and compositional heterogeneity of the oligomeric species. Here, we develop an approach to simultaneously and self-consistently characterize the conformational ensemble and the distribution of oligomeric states of SPOP by combining small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We build initial conformational ensembles of SPOP oligomers using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations, and use a Bayesian/maximum entropy approach to refine the ensembles, along with the distribution of oligomeric states, against a concentration series of SAXS experiments. Our results suggest that SPOP oligomers behave as rigid, helical structures in solution, and that a flexible linker region allows SPOP’s substrate-binding domains to extend away from the core of the oligomers. Additionally, our results are in good agreement with previous characterization of the isodesmic self-association of SPOP. In the future, the approach presented here can be extended to other systems to simultaneously characterize structural heterogeneity and self-assembly.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Martini 3: A general purpose force field for coarse-grained molecular dynamics
Souza, P. C. T., Alessandri, R., Barnoud, J., Thallmair, S., Faustino, I., Grünewald, F., Patmanidis, I., Abdizadeh, H., Bruininks, B. M. H., Wassenaar, T. A., et al. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01098-3 · Cited by 1,551 · see citing works
Zhuang, M., Calabrese, M. F., Liu, J., Waddell, M. B., Nourse, A., Hammel, M., Miller, D. J., Walden, H., Duda, D. M., Seyedin, S. N., et al. (2009) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.022 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lidbrink, S. E., Howard, R. J., Haloi, N., & Lindahl, E. (2025) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013187 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thomasen, F. E., Cuneo, M. J., Mittag, T., & Lindorff-Larsen, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
- Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2023-03-01
- Volume
- 12
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9998093
- OpenAlex
- W4322718763
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Lundbeckfonden (R155-2015-2666)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0033950, NNF18OC0032608)
- National Institutes of Health (R01GM112846, P30GM133893, OD012331)
- American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
- DOE Office of Science's Biological and Environmental Research (KP1605010)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Keywords
- SPOP, protein oligomerization, conformational heterogeneity, coarse-grained molecular dynamics, helical oligomers, flexible linkers, ubiquitin-proteasome system, biomolecular condensates, phase separation
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Nuclear Proteins, Protein Conformation, Repressor Proteins, X-Ray Diffraction, X-Rays, Scattering, Small Angle, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review