Myristoylated Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 captures the preciliary vesicle at distal appendages
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of preciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures preciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the preciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Kanie et al., 2025). The lack of a membrane-binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit preciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and the centriole-associated vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similar to CEP89 knockouts, preciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the preciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the preciliary vesicles.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Genes and molecular pathways underpinning ciliopathies
Reiter, J. F., & Leroux, M. R. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.60 · Cited by 1,588 · see citing works
High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes
The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium, Dickinson, M. E., Flenniken, A. M., Ji, X., Teboul, L., Wong, M. D., White, J. K., Meehan, T. F., Weninger, W. J., Westerberg, H., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19356 · Cited by 1,196 · see citing works
Mirzadeh, Z., Merkle, F. T., Soriano-Navarro, M., Garcia-Verdugo, J. M., & Alvarez-Buylla, A. (2008) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.004 · Cited by 1,015 · see citing works
Hedgehog signaling and primary cilia are required for the formation of adult neural stem cells
Han, Y.-G., Spassky, N., Romaguera-Ros, M., Garcia-Verdugo, J.-M., Aguilar, A., Schneider-Maunoury, S., & Alvarez-Buylla, A. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2059 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Hippocampal neurons possess primary cilia in culture
Berbari, N. F., Bishop, G. A., Askwith, C. C., Lewis, J. S., & Mykytyn, K. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.21209 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Wang, Z., Phan, T., & Storm, D. R. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6561-10.2011 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Hippocampal and Cortical Primary Cilia Are Required for Aversive Memory in Mice
Berbari, N. F., Malarkey, E. B., Yazdi, S. M. Z. R., McNair, A. D., Kippe, J. M., Croyle, M. J., Kraft, T. W., & Yoder, B. K. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106576 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Rhee, S., Kirschen, G. W., Gu, Y., & Ge, S. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34370 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Kanie, T., Ng, R., Abbott, K. L., Tanvir, N. M., Lorentzen, E., Pongs, O., & Jackson, P. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Saarland University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kanie, Tomoharu
- Jackson, Peter K
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2025-01-30
- Volume
- 14
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11984960
- OpenAlex
- W4406965145
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103447, 1R35GM151013, R01GM114276, R01GM121565)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Keywords
- primary cilium formation, NCS-1, myristoylation, Rab34, centrioles, protein-protein interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review