Cited by 0Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interpreting roles of mutations associated with the emergence of S. aureus USA300 strains using transcriptional regulatory network reconstruction

Open access
Poudel, Saugat, Hyun, Jason, Hefner, Ying, Monk, Jon, Nizet, Victor, Palsson, Bernhard O·2025·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 8 (CC8) is made up of several subtypes with varying levels of clinical burden; from community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus USA300 strains to hospital-associated (HA-MRSA) USA500 strains and ancestral methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) strains. This phenotypic distribution within a single clonal complex makes CC8 an ideal clade to study the emergence of mutations important for antibiotic resistance and community spread. Gene-level analysis comparing USA300 against MSSA and HA-MRSA strains have revealed key horizontally acquired genes important for its rapid spread in the community. However, efforts to define the contributions of point mutations and indels have been confounded by strong linkage disequilibrium resulting from clonal propagation. To break down this confounding effect, we combined genetic association testing with a model of the transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) to find candidate mutations that may have led to changes in gene regulation. First, we used a De Bruijn graph genome-wide association study to enrich mutations unique to the USA300 lineages within CC8. Next, we reconstructed the TRN by using independent component analysis on 670 RNA-sequencing samples from USA300 and non-USA300 CC8 strains which predicted several genes with strain-specific altered expression patterns. Examination of the regulatory region of one of the genes enriched by both approaches, isdH , revealed a 38-bp deletion containing a Fur-binding site and a conserved single-nucleotide polymorphism which likely led to the altered expression levels in USA300 strains. Taken together, our results demonstrate the utility of reconstructed TRNs to address the limits of genetic approaches when studying emerging pathogenic strains.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.90668

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Bailey, 2009, MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching, Nucleic Acids Research, 37, W202, 10.1093/nar/gkp335 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bal, 2016, Genomic insights into the emergence and spread of international clones of healthcare-, community- and livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Blurring of the traditional definitions, Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 6, 95, 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.04.004 · DOI
  3. Bowers, 2018, Improved subtyping of Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 8 strains based on whole-genome phylogenetic analysis, mSphere, 3, 10.1128/mSphere.00464-17 · DOI
  4. Boyle-Vavra, 2015, USA300 and USA500 clonal lineages of Staphylococcus aureus do not produce a capsular polysaccharide due to conserved mutations in the cap5 locus, mBio, 6, 10.1128/mBio.02585-14 · DOI
  5. Challagundla, 2018, Range expansion and the origin of USA300 north American epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, mBio, 9, 10.1128/mBio.02016-17 · DOI
  6. Challagundla, 2018, phylogenomic classification and the evolution of clonal complex 5 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the western hemisphere, Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01901 · DOI
  7. Choi, 2012, Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels, PLOS ONE, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0046688 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Choudhary, 2018, The Staphylococcus aureus two-component system agrac displays four distinct genomic arrangements that delineate genomic virulence factor signatures, Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01082 · DOI
  9. Cock, 2009, Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics, Bioinformatics, 25, 1422, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Correction for Copin, 2019, Sequential evolution of virulence and resistance during clonal spread of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, PNAS, 116, 10.1073/pnas.1902207116 · DOI
  11. Diep, 2008, The arginine catabolic mobile element and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec linkage: convergence of virulence and resistance in the USA300 clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 197, 1523, 10.1086/587907 · DOI
  12. Earle, 2016, Identifying lineage effects when controlling for population structure improves power in bacterial association studies, Nature Microbiology, 1, 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.41 · DOI
  13. Ellis-Guardiola, 2020, The Staphylococcus aureus IsdH receptor forms a dynamic complex with human hemoglobin that triggers heme release via two distinct hot spots, Journal of Molecular Biology, 432, 1064, 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.12.023 · DOI
  14. Everitt, 2014, Mobile elements drive recombination hotspots in the core genome of Staphylococcus aureus, Nature Communications, 5, 10.1038/ncomms4956 · DOI
  15. Ewels, 2016, MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report, Bioinformatics, 32, 3047, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Faden, 2010, Importance of colonization site in the current epidemic of staphylococcal skin abscesses, Pediatrics, 125, e618, 10.1542/peds.2009-1523 · DOI
  17. Fu, 2012, CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data, Bioinformatics, 28, 3150, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hagberg AA, Schult DA, Swart PJ. 2008. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkx. Python in Science Conference. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Highlander, 2007, Subtle genetic changes enhance virulence of methicillin resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, BMC Microbiology, 7, 10.1186/1471-2180-7-99 · DOI
  20. Hoang, 2018, UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35, 518, 10.1093/molbev/msx281 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Huerta-Cepas, 2016, ETE 3: Reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33, 1635, 10.1093/molbev/msw046 · DOI
  22. Hyun, 2022, Comparative pangenomics: analysis of 12 microbial pathogen pangenomes reveals conserved global structures of genetic and functional diversity, BMC Genomics, 23, 10.1186/s12864-021-08223-8 · DOI
  23. Iqbal, 2016, Comparative virulence studies and transcriptome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from animals, Scientific Reports, 6, 10.1038/srep35442 · DOI
  24. Jaillard, 2018, A fast and agnostic method for bacterial genome-wide association studies: Bridging the gap between k-mers and genetic events, PLOS Genetics, 14, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007758 · DOI
  25. Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P. 2001. Open source scientific tools for python. SciPy. 1.15.2.
  26. Jones, 2014, Genomic and transcriptomic differences in community acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 and USA400 strains, BMC Genomics, 15, 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1145 · DOI
  27. Kalyaanamoorthy, 2017, ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates, Nature Methods, 14, 587, 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Katoh, 2002, MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform, Nucleic Acids Research, 30, 3059, 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kavvas, 2020, A biochemically-interpretable machine learning classifier for microbial GWAS, Nature Communications, 11, 10.1038/s41467-020-16310-9 · DOI
  30. Kaya, 2018, SCC mec finder, a web-based tool for typing of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in Staphylococcus aureus using whole-genome sequence data, mSphere, 3, 10.1128/mSphere.00612-17 · DOI
  31. Kiliç, 2014, CollecTF: a database of experimentally validated transcription factor-binding sites in Bacteria, Nucleic Acids Research, 42, D156, 10.1093/nar/gkt1123 · DOI
  32. Koldovský, 2006, Efficient variant of algorithm FastICA for independent component analysis attaining the Cramér-Rao lower bound, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 17, 1265, 10.1109/TNN.2006.875991 · DOI
  33. Krishna, 2018, Naturally occurring polymorphisms in the virulence regulator Rsp modulate Staphylococcus aureus survival in blood and antibiotic susceptibility, Microbiology, 164, 1189, 10.1099/mic.0.000695 · DOI
  34. Krueger FTG. 2015. A wrapper tool around cutadapt and fastqc to consistently apply quality and adapter trimming to fastq files. Babraham Bioinformatics. 0.6.5.
  35. Langmead, 2012, Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2, Nature Methods, 9, 357, 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Letunic, 2021, Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation, Nucleic Acids Research, 49, W293, 10.1093/nar/gkab301 · DOI
  37. McConn, 2021, Optimal dimensionality selection for independent component analysis of transcriptomic data, BMC Bioinformatics, 22, 10.1186/s12859-021-04497-7 · DOI
  38. Minh, 2020, IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37, 1530, 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Nishizaki, 2020, Predicting the effects of SNPs on transcription factor binding affinity, Bioinformatics, 36, 364, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz612 · DOI
  40. Page, 2015, Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis, Bioinformatics, 31, 3691, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Pedregosa, 2011, Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python, Journal of Machine Learning Research: JMLR, 12, 2825
  42. Poudel S. 2024. USA300GWASPUB. Software Heritage. swh:1:rev:6233dcb1b5c358d69b8bb07510c16d330177f0f5. https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:5473cd3e32c9fdec74906a29fdb89e63250c02b1;origin=https://github.com/sapoudel/USA300GWASPUB;visit=swh:1:snp:9218af298893379bba7f4ae7b1d7f930d74003f2;anchor=swh:1:rev:6233dcb1b5c358d69b8bb07510c16d330177f0f5.
  43. Prados, 2016, TSS-EMOTE, a refined protocol for a more complete and less biased global mapping of transcription start sites in bacterial pathogens, BMC Genomics, 17, 10.1186/s12864-016-3211-3 · DOI
  44. Robinson, 2004, Evolution of Staphylococcus aureus by large chromosomal replacements, Journal of Bacteriology, 186, 1060, 10.1128/JB.186.4.1060-1064.2004 · DOI
  45. Sastry, 2019, The Escherichia coli transcriptome mostly consists of independently regulated modules, Nature Communications, 10, 10.1038/s41467-019-13483-w · DOI
  46. Sastry, 2021, Mining all publicly available expression data to compute dynamic microbial transcriptional regulatory networks, 10.1101/2021.07.01.450581 · DOI
  47. Shakya, 2020, Standardized phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analysis applied to species across the microbial tree of life, Scientific Reports, 10, 10.1038/s41598-020-58356-1 · DOI
  48. Steinig, 2019, Evolution and global transmission of a multidrug-resistant, community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage from the indian subcontinent, mBio, 10, 10.1128/mBio.01105-19 · DOI
  49. Systems Biology Research Group. 2022. DBGWAS Network Analysis. Software Heritage. swh:1:rev:21965d5257843d2a3e7a957d5070b37482b9b65f. https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:1f01cf134d43341f8d923358bae78b9c00579cdf;origin=https://github.com/SBRG/dbgwas-network;visit=swh:1:snp:0a350852c30e657378a04214ce2f9319b27598af;anchor=swh:1:rev:21965d5257843d2a3e7a957d5070b37482b9b65f.
  50. Thurlow, 2012, Virulence strategies of the dominant USA300 lineage of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA), FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, 65, 5, 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00937.x · DOI
  51. Uhlemann, 2014, Molecular tracing of the emergence, diversification, and transmission of S. aureus sequence type 8 in a New York community, PNAS, 111, 6738, 10.1073/pnas.1401006111 · DOI
  52. Wattam, 2014, PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource, Nucleic Acids Research, 42, D581, 10.1093/nar/gkt1099 · DOI
  53. Young, 2019, Panton-Valentine leucocidin is the key determinant of Staphylococcus aureus pyomyositis in a bacterial GWAS, eLife, 8, 10.7554/eLife.42486 · DOI
  54. Yuan, 2022, Pan-genomic analysis of transcriptional modules across Salmonella typhimurium reveals the regulatory landscape of different strains, 10.1101/2022.01.11.475931 · DOI
  55. Poudel S, Szubin R, Palsson BO. 2024. Effect of different carbon sources on gene expression of S. aureus USA300 JE2. NCBI BioProject. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1086018. PRJNA1086018.
  56. Poudel S, Szubin R, Palsson BO. 2022. Staphylococcus aureus JE2 TF knockout gene expression. NCBI BioProject. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA881834. PRJNA881834.
  57. Poudel S, Szubin R, Palsson BO. 2022. Metabolic perturbation of S. aureus USA300 JE2. NCBI BioProject. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA872284. PRJNA872284.

Metadata

Authors
Poudel, S., Hyun, J., Hefner, Y., Monk, J., Nizet, V., & Palsson, B. O.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Palmona Pathogenomics
  • University of California, San Diego
Venue
eLife
Published
2025-04-30
Volume
12
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388493293
Cited by
0
References
5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI124316)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Staphylococcus aureus, USA300, clonal complex 8, community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, transcriptional regulatory networks, gene expression regulation, IsdH, indels, point mutations, linkage disequilibrium, horizontal gene transfer, antibiotic resistance, strain-specific gene expression, independent component analysis
MeSH terms
Humans, Mutation, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genome-Wide Association Study, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review