Cited by 6RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Research and SplicingNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Translational regulation enhances distinction of cell types in the nervous system

Open access
Ichinose, Toshiharu, Kondo, Shu, Kanno, Mai, Shichino, Yuichi, Mito, Mari, Iwasaki, Shintaro, Tanimoto, Hiromu·2024·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Multicellular organisms are composed of specialized cell types with distinct proteomes. While recent advances in single-cell transcriptome analyses have revealed differential expression of mRNAs, cellular diversity in translational profiles remains underinvestigated. By performing RNA-seq and Ribo-seq in genetically defined cells in the Drosophila brain, we here revealed substantial post-transcriptional regulations that augment the cell-type distinctions at the level of protein expression. Specifically, we found that translational efficiency of proteins fundamental to neuronal functions, such as ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors, was maintained low in glia, leading to their preferential translation in neurons. Notably, distribution of ribosome footprints on these mRNAs exhibited a remarkable bias toward the 5′ leaders in glia. Using transgenic reporter strains, we provide evidence that the small upstream open-reading frames in the 5’ leader confer selective translational suppression in glia. Overall, these findings underscore the profound impact of translational regulation in shaping the proteomics for cell-type distinction and provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms driving cell-type diversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.90713.3

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ichinose, T., Kondo, S., Kanno, M., Shichino, Y., Mito, M., Iwasaki, S., & Tanimoto, H.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Tokyo University of Science (JP)
  • RIKEN (JP)
Venue
eLife
Published
2024-07-16
Volume
12
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400700256
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (21K06369, 21H05713, JP20H05784, JP21K15023, 22H05481, 22KK0106, 20H00519)
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP20gm1410001)
  • Takeda Science Foundation
  • RIKEN (Biology of Intracellular Environments, Special Postdoctoral Researchers, Incentive Research Projects)
  • Tohoku University Research Program "Frontier Research in Duo"
  • The Uehara Memorial Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
translational regulation, cell type specificity, Drosophila brain, ribosome profiling, glia, neurons, 5' leader, upstream open reading frames, translational suppression, ion channels, neurotransmitter receptors, post-transcriptional regulation, cell type diversity, proteome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review