Cited by 2Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic VariationsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Evolutionary adaptation of an HP1-protein chromodomain integrates chromatin and DNA sequence signals

Open access
Baumgartner, Lisa, Ipsaro, Jonathan J, Hohmann, Ulrich, Handler, Dominik, Schleiffer, Alexander, Duchek, Peter, Brennecke, Julius·2024·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Members of the diverse heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family play crucial roles in heterochromatin formation and maintenance. Despite the similar affinities of their chromodomains for di- and tri-methylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2/3), different HP1 proteins exhibit distinct chromatin-binding patterns, likely due to interactions with various specificity factors. Previously, we showed that the chromatin-binding pattern of the HP1 protein Rhino, a crucial factor of the Drosophila PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway, is largely defined by a DNA sequence-specific C 2 H 2 zinc finger protein named Kipferl (Baumgartner et al., 2022). Here, we elucidate the molecular basis of the interaction between Rhino and its guidance factor Kipferl. Through phylogenetic analyses, structure prediction, and in vivo genetics, we identify a single amino acid change within Rhino’s chromodomain, G31D, that does not affect H3K9me2/3 binding but disrupts the interaction between Rhino and Kipferl. Flies carrying the rhino G31D mutation phenocopy kipferl mutant flies, with Rhino redistributing from piRNA clusters to satellite repeats, causing pronounced changes in the ovarian piRNA profile of rhino G31D flies. Thus, Rhino’s chromodomain functions as a dual-specificity module, facilitating interactions with both a histone mark and a DNA-binding protein.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.93194.3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Baumgartner, L., Ipsaro, J. J., Hohmann, U., Handler, D., Schleiffer, A., Duchek, P., & Brennecke, J.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (AT)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
eLife
Published
2024-07-12
Volume
13
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400580549
Cited by
2
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
  • European Research Council (CoG-682181, ERC-2015-CoG-682181)
  • Austrian Science Fund (10.55776/w1207)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (896416)
  • EMBO long-term fellowship (ALTF_1175-2019)
  • National Institutes of Health (1S10OD025102-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
rhinoceros, HP1 proteins, chromodomain, C2H2 zinc finger, heterochromatin, piRNA pathway, H3K9 methylation, protein-protein interaction, satellite repeats, Drosophila, adaptive evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review