Cited by 4SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Accurate predictions of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity from comprehensive analysis

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

An unprecedented amount of SARS-CoV-2 data has been accumulated compared with previous infectious diseases, enabling insights into its evolutionary process and more thorough analyses. This study investigates SARS-CoV-2 features as it evolved to evaluate its infectivity. We examined viral sequences and identified the polarity of amino acids in the receptor binding motif (RBM) region. We detected an increased frequency of amino acid substitutions to lysine (K) and arginine (R) in variants of concern (VOCs). As the virus evolved to Omicron, commonly occurring mutations became fixed components of the new viral sequence. Furthermore, at specific positions of VOCs, only one type of amino acid substitution and a notable absence of mutations at D467 were detected. We found that the binding affinity of SARS-CoV-2 lineages to the ACE2 receptor was impacted by amino acid substitutions. Based on our discoveries, we developed APESS, an evaluation model evaluating infectivity from biochemical and mutational properties. In silico evaluation using real-world sequences and in vitro viral entry assays validated the accuracy of APESS and our discoveries. Using Machine Learning, we predicted mutations that had the potential to become more prominent. We created AIVE, a web-based system, accessible at https://ai-ve.org to provide infectivity measurements of mutations entered by users. Ultimately, we established a clear link between specific viral properties and increased infectivity, enhancing our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 and enabling more accurate predictions of the virus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.99833.3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 4

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Ali, 2021, The new SARS-CoV-2 strain shows a stronger binding affinity to ACE2 due to N501Y mutant, Medicine in Drug Discovery, 10, 10.1016/j.medidd.2021.100086 · DOI
  2. Ban, 2019, Evolutionary stability of salt bridges hints its contribution to stability of proteins, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 17, 895, 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.06.022 · DOI
  3. Baral, 2021, Mutation-induced changes in the receptor-binding interface of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant B.1.617.2 and implications for immune evasion, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 574, 14, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.08.036 · DOI
  4. Bergasa-Caceres, 2020, Interdiction of protein folding for therapeutic drug development in SARS CoV-2, The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, 124, 8201, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c03716 · DOI
  5. Berman, 2023, MutaGAN: A sequence-to-sequence GAN framework to predict mutations of evolving protein populations, Virus Evolution, 9, 10.1093/ve/vead022 · DOI
  6. Bhowmick, 2022, In silico protein folding prediction of covid-19 mutations and variants, Biomolecules, 12, 10.3390/biom12111665 · DOI
  7. Bouhaddou, 2023, SARS-CoV-2 variants evolve convergent strategies to remodel the host response, Cell, 186, 4597, 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.026 · DOI
  8. Cao, 2021, Biomechanical characterization of SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD and human ACE2 protein-protein interaction, Biophysical Journal, 120, 1011, 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.007 · DOI
  9. Cao, 2022, Omicron escapes the majority of existing SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies, Nature, 602, 657, 10.1038/s41586-021-04385-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Chen, 2022, Global landscape of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance and data sharing, Nature Genetics, 54, 499, 10.1038/s41588-022-01033-y · DOI
  11. Hadfield, 2018, Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution, Bioinformatics, 34, 4121, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty407 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Han, 2022, Receptor binding and complex structures of human ACE2 to spike RBD from omicron and delta SARS-CoV-2, Cell, 185, 630, 10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.001 · DOI
  13. Honglab-Research. 2023. AIVE. Software Heritage. swh:1:rev:095b018c31384e0e20bf1c643bed7dd5fbd40414. https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:a319c5add134b653f2ef21419067d71292d86b3f;origin=https://github.com/Honglab-Research/AIVE;visit=swh:1:snp:591f6175be9f2f00c66184fa1878725609ecfcd3;anchor=swh:1:rev:095b018c31384e0e20bf1c643bed7dd5fbd40414.
  14. Honglab-Research. 2024. AIVE-prediction. Software Heritage. swh:1:rev:9401d4b10b4e73656721583c0fa000bcbcb3aa6e. https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:7dcacb61c2ba57e13ce44670682421e064348e94;origin=https://github.com/Honglab-Research/AIVE-prediction;visit=swh:1:snp:43ee045b188b050cc9af87db2f4dca13ecf17543;anchor=swh:1:rev:9401d4b10b4e73656721583c0fa000bcbcb3aa6e.
  15. Hu, 2021, The key amino acids of E protein involved in early flavivirus infection: viral entry, Virology Journal, 18, 10.1186/s12985-021-01611-2 · DOI
  16. Islam, 2019, Hydrophobic surface residues can stabilize a protein through improved water-protein interactions, The FEBS Journal, 286, 4122, 10.1111/febs.14941 · DOI
  17. Ito, 2023, Convergent evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants leading to the emergence of BQ.1.1 variant, Nature Communications, 14, 10.1038/s41467-023-38188-z · DOI
  18. Khan, 2010, pDOCK: a new technique for rapid and accurate docking of peptide ligands to Major Histocompatibility Complexes, Immunome Research, 6 Suppl 1, 10.1186/1745-7580-6-S1-S2 · DOI
  19. Kilim, 2023, SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain deep mutational AlphaFold2 structures, Scientific Data, 10, 10.1038/s41597-023-02035-z · DOI
  20. Kleine-Weber, 2019, Mutations in the spike protein of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus transmitted in korea increase resistance to antibody-mediated neutralization, Journal of Virology, 93, 10.1128/JVI.01381-18 · DOI
  21. Lins, 1995, The hydrophobic effect in protein folding, FASEB Journal, 9, 535, 10.1096/fasebj.9.7.7737462 · DOI
  22. Mathieu, 2021, A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations, Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 947, 10.1038/s41562-021-01122-8 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Pace, 2011, Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to protein stability, Journal of Molecular Biology, 408, 514, 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.053 · DOI
  24. Panchin, 2020, Excessive G-U transversions in novel allele variants in SARS-CoV-2 genomes, PeerJ, 8, 10.7717/peerj.9648 · DOI
  25. Peacock, 2021, The furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is required for transmission in ferrets, Nature Microbiology, 6, 899, 10.1038/s41564-021-00908-w · DOI
  26. Pettersen, 2021, UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers, Protein Science, 30, 70, 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
  27. Ruch, 2011, The hydrophobic domain of infectious bronchitis virus E protein alters the host secretory pathway and is important for release of infectious virus, Journal of Virology, 85, 675, 10.1128/JVI.01570-10 · DOI
  28. Senior, 2020, Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning, Nature, 577, 706, 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Seyran, 2021, The structural basis of accelerated host cell entry by SARS-CoV-2†, The FEBS Journal, 288, 5010, 10.1111/febs.15651 · DOI
  30. Shekhawat, 2022, Computational and comparative investigation of hydrophobic profile of spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, Journal of Biological Physics, 48, 399, 10.1007/s10867-022-09615-x · DOI
  31. Shu, 2017, GISAID: Global initiative on sharing all influenza data - from vision to reality, Euro Surveillance, 22, 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.13.30494 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Theodosiou, 2023, Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning: Potential resources for the infection clinician, The Journal of Infection, 87, 287, 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.07.006 · DOI
  33. Thirunavukarasu, 2023, Large language models in medicine, Nature Medicine, 29, 1930, 10.1038/s41591-023-02448-8 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Tsai, 2021, Comprehensive deep mutational scanning reveals the immune-escaping hotspots of sars-cov-2 receptor-binding domain targeting neutralizing antibodies, Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.698365 · DOI
  35. van Zundert, 2016, The haddock2.2 web server: user-friendly integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes, Journal of Molecular Biology, 428, 720, 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Wong, 2021, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus Spike protein variants exhibit geographic differences in virulence, PNAS, 118, 10.1073/pnas.2102983118 · DOI
  37. Yang, 2021, A deep learning framework identifies dimensional representations of Alzheimer’s Disease from brain structure, Nature Communications, 12, 10.1038/s41467-021-26703-z · DOI
  38. Yang, 2022, A large language model for electronic health records, NPJ Digital Medicine, 5, 10.1038/s41746-022-00742-2 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Yi, 2021, Mutational spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 during the global pandemic, Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 53, 1229, 10.1038/s12276-021-00658-z · DOI
  40. Zhou, 2023, TEMPO: A transformer-based mutation prediction framework for SARS-CoV-2 evolution, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 152, 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106264 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Park, J., Choi, W., Seong, D. Y., Jeong, S., Lee, J. Y., Park, H. J., Chung, D. S., Yi, K., Kim, U., Yoon, G.-Y., Kim, H., Kim, T., Ko, S., Min, E. J., Cho, H.-S., Cho, N.-H., & Hong, D.
Affiliations
  • Catholic University of Korea (KR)
  • Department of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea
  • Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute and Technology
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Seoul National University College of Medicine
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University
  • The Catholic University of Korea Catholic Medical Center (KR)
Corresponding author
Hong, Dongwan
Venue
eLife
Published
2024-12-24
Volume
13
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399706995
Cited by
4
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021M3H9A2097227, NRF-2022R1A2C3008162, RS-2023-00220840, NRF: 2021M3A9I2080490)
  • Korea Health Industry Development Institute (RS-2023-00265923, RS-2024-00406488)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, receptor-binding motif, amino acid substitutions, variants of concern, Omicron variant, ACE2 receptor binding affinity, viral evolution, web-based prediction tool
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Mutation, Protein Binding, Amino Acid Substitution, Virus Internalization, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review