The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inka Settlement Planning
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
El primer patrón arquitectónico, materializado en las postas altiplánicas y altoandinas de Amachuma, Alota y Viscachillas, presentó un diseño tipo kancha, con recintos en U alrededor de un patio central amurallado.
“El primer patrón arquitectónico, materializado en las postas altiplánicas y altoandinas de Amachuma, Alota y Viscachillas (Figura 3), presentó un diseño tipo kancha (Hyslop, 1990), con recintos en U alrededor de un patio central amurallado.”
From La ruta colonial de potosí a cobija y la vieja nueva praxis de modelos andinos mercantiles (2022) · cites this paper as Hyslop, 1990
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping the Political Landscape: Toward a GIS Analysis of Environmental and Social Difference
Kosiba, S., & Bauer, A. M. (2013) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-011-9126-z · Cited by 80
EL QHAPAQ ÑAN COMO ESPACIO DE PODER DE LA POLÍTICA INCAICA
Moralejo, R. A., & Gobbo, D. (2015) · Estudios atacameños · doi:10.4067/s0718-10432015000100007 · Cited by 8
La ruta colonial de potosí a cobija y la vieja nueva praxis de modelos andinos mercantiles
García-Albarido, F. (2022) · Estudios Atacameños · doi:10.22199/issn.0718-1043-2022-0013 · Cited by 7
Road to empire: documenting an inca road in northern Ecuador
Sistrunk, H. (2010) · Ñawpa Pacha · doi:10.1179/naw.2010.30.2.189 · Cited by 6
Becoming “Rebels” and “Idolaters” in the Valley of Volcanoes, Southern Peru
Menaker, A. (2019) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-018-0482-1 · Cited by 4
Vaquer, J. M., Llapur, L., & Stokes, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.3389/fearc.2024.1450968
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyslop, J.
- Publisher
- University of Texas Press
- Published
- 1990-12-31
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review