Cited by 26Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisSimulation Techniques and Applications

Describing economic agent-based models—Dahlem ABM documentation guidelines

Open access
Wolf, Sarah, Bouchaud, Jean-Philippe, Cecconi, Federico, Cincotti, Silvano, Dawid, Herbert, Gintis, Herbert, van der Hoog, Sander, Jaegera, Carlo C. +3 more·2013·Complexity Economics

Abstract

At the 100th Dahlem conference “New Approaches in Economics after the Financial Crisis” a working group devised guidelines for the documentation of computational economic agent-based models, based upon – but differing from – the ODD protocol Grimm et al. (2006, 2010). This paper sketches the motivation for coming up with a new set of guidelines tailored to economic multi-agent modelling, and presents these. While analytical economic models can often be precisely and concisely stated by a few equations together with an economic interpretation of their elements, a computational agentbased model, as a conceptual piece of work, may not always be a very tangible entity. For example, it is represented by but usually not identical to the (many) equations constituting the computer code. It is therefore not always easy to describe the model in a way that provides the reader with a thorough understanding of the model. The present guidelines are an attempt at standardizing such descriptions to support understanding and communication, as well as the comparability of economic multi-agent models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7564/13-coec12

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolf, S., Bouchaud, J.-P., Cecconi, F., Cincotti, S., Dawid, H., Gintis, H., van der Hoog, S., Jaegera, C. C., Kovalevsky, D. V., Mandel, A., & Paroussos, L.
Affiliations
  • St. Petersburg Department of Steklov Institute of Mathematics (RU)
  • St Petersburg University (RU)
Venue
Complexity Economics
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
63-74
ISSN
  • 2210-4275 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-4283
OpenAlex
W1996641373
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Complexity Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
Keywords
agent-based modeling, model documentation, documentation guidelines, ODD protocol, computational economics, model standardization, model communication, model comparability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review