CRACK DAMAGE DETECTION IN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE IMAGES OF CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE USING PRE-TRAINED DEEP LEARNING MODEL
Open accessAbstract
The field of computer vision based civil infrastructure defect detection is constantly evolving with steady advances being made in sensing technologies, hardware, and image processing techniques.Although a number of image processing techniques have been proposed over the years with varying degrees of success, real-world situations (e.g., lack of background illumination, shadow changes) pose a significant challenge to the wide adoption of such techniques, especially for routine analysis.With the emerging application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or drones for civil infrastructure inspection and condition monitoring, an added level of complexity is introduced in vision-based crack detection as the process of acquiring images using UAVs is not yet standardized resulting in images of widely varying sizes, resolutions, blurriness, etc.In recent years, Deep Learning, a generalized form of Deep Neural Network (DNN) algorithms that can learn very complex mappings between inputs and outputs directly from the data, has achieved huge success in diverse fields such as automatic speech recognition, image recognition, Natural Language Processing (NLP), drug and materials discovery, etc.However, the large number of hidden neurons and layers used in DNNs result in computationally-intensive matrix and vector computations involving millions of parameters, requiring the use of high-performance computing systems.Also, it is practically impossible to get labeled "big data" samples in many domains to be able to train an entire DNN from scratch.In such situations, the use of a pre-trained deep learning model and fine-tuning it to the novel task at hand with smaller datasets, has shown to be successful across domains.In this paper, we propose the use of pre-trained deep learning models with transfer learning for crack damage detection in UAV images of civil infrastructure.The robustness of the proposed approach is tested on a small set of real-world, complex UAV-sourced infrastructure images not used during training and validation.The results show that the proposed method can rapidly and easily achieve up to 90% accuracy in finding cracks in realistic situations without any augmentation and preprocessing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transfer learning and pre-trained deep learning models can achieve up to 90% accuracy in crack discovery in UAV photos of civil infrastructure without data augmentation or preprocessing.
“The results demonstrate that, without any data augmentation or preprocessing, their suggested strategy can quickly and simply achieve up to 90% accuracy in crack discovery in real-world scenarios.”
From Smart Transportation: An Overview of Technologies and Applications (2023) · cites this paper as [116]
Cites
Shin, H.-C., Roth, H. R., Gao, M., Lu, L., Xu, Z., Nogues, I., Yao, J., Mollura, D., & Summers, R. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528162 · Cited by 5,759 · see citing works
Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones
Floreano, D., & Wood, R. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14542 · Cited by 1,476 · see citing works
Chest pathology detection using deep learning with non-medical training
Bar, Y., Diamant, I., Wolf, L., Lieberman, S., Konen, E., & Greenspan, H. (2015) · 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2015.7163871 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent advances and applications of deep learning methods in materials science
Choudhary, K., DeCost, B., Chen, C., Jain, A., Tavazza, F., Cohn, R., Park, C. W., Choudhary, A., Agrawal, A., Billinge, S. J. L., et al. (2022) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00734-6 · Cited by 1,172 · see citing works
“ImageNet-based deep transfer learning has also been successfully applied for crack detection in macroscale materials images [266, 267], as well as for property prediction on small, noisy, and heterogeneous industrial datasets [268, 269].”
BackgroundAzimi, M., Eslamlou, A., & Pekcan, G. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102778 · Cited by 769 · see citing works
Smart Transportation: An Overview of Technologies and Applications
Oladimeji, D., Gupta, K., Kose, N. A., Gundogan, K., Ge, L., & Liang, F. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23083880 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Deep Learning in Data-Driven Pavement Image Analysis and Automated Distress Detection: A Review
Gopalakrishnan, K. (2018) · Data · doi:10.3390/data3030028 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
- Venue
- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERING
- Published
- 2018-02-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 2217-544X (ISSN-L)
- 2217-5652
- OpenAlex
- W4243129671
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 9.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1409601, 70NANB14H012)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0014330, DESC0007456)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (FA9550-12-1-0458, 70NANB14H012)
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, #FA9550-12-1-0458, FA9550-12, FA9550‐12‐1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Keywords
- crack detection, civil infrastructure inspection, unmanned aerial vehicles, UAV imagery, transfer learning, pre-trained deep learning models, fine-tuning, damage detection, condition monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review