Cited by 210Infrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

Deep Learning in Data-Driven Pavement Image Analysis and Automated Distress Detection: A Review

Open access
Gopalakrishnan, Kasthurirangan·2018·Data

Abstract

Deep learning, more specifically deep convolutional neural networks, is fast becoming a popular choice for computer vision-based automated pavement distress detection. While pavement image analysis has been extensively researched over the past three decades or so, recent ground-breaking achievements of deep learning algorithms in the areas of machine translation, speech recognition, and computer vision has sparked interest in the application of deep learning to automated detection of distresses in pavement images. This paper provides a narrative review of recently published studies in this field, highlighting the current achievements and challenges. A comparison of the deep learning software frameworks, network architecture, hyper-parameters employed by each study, and crack detection performance is provided, which is expected to provide a good foundation for driving further research on this important topic in the context of smart pavement or asset management systems. The review concludes with potential avenues for future research; especially in the application of deep learning to not only detect, but also characterize the type, extent, and severity of distresses from 2D and 3D pavement images.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/data3030028

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In [21], the review concluded that both CNN and DCNN perform very well in pavement image classification.

    “In the review's conclusion, it is mentioned that both CNN and DCNN perform very well in pavement image classification.”

    From A Review of Machine Learning and IoT in Smart Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

  • The review in [21] summarizes 12 of the most recent studies in pavement distress detection that are based on CNN and DCNN methods.

    “The review summarizes 12 of the most recent studies in the pavement distress detection which are based on CNN and DCNN methods.”

    From A Review of Machine Learning and IoT in Smart Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

  • [21] concludes that CNNs show the best results in terms of pavement image classification in most studies.

    “the author concludes that CNNs show the best results in terms of pavement image classification in most studies.”

    From A Review of Machine Learning and IoT in Smart Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

  • [21] finds no clear indication that DCNNs can be more accurate than shallower CNNs, and that other parameters such as data pre-processing, augmentation, and feature selection affect classification results.

    “There is no clear indication that DCNNs can be more accurate than shallower CNNs and there are a lot of other parameters that affect the classification results, such as data pre-processing, augmentation, and feature selection.”

    From A Review of Machine Learning and IoT in Smart Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

  • [21] conducted a detailed review of deep learning techniques applied for pavement distresses detection.

    “The author in [21] has conducted a detailed review of deep learning techniques applied for pavement distresses detection.”

    From A Review of Machine Learning and IoT in Smart Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gopalakrishnan, K.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gopalakrishnan, Kasthurirangan
Venue
Data
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-07-24
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
28
ISSN
2306-5729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884143694
Cited by
210
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12
FWCI
13.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Data (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Keywords
pavement distress detection, deep convolutional neural networks, crack detection, automated pavement inspection, smart pavements, asset management systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review