The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leopard (Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range
Open accessAbstract
The leopard’s (Panthera pardus) broad geographic range, remarkable adaptability, and secretive nature have contributed to a misconception that this species might not be severely threatened across its range. We find that not only are several subspecies and regional populations critically endangered but also the overall range loss is greater than the average for terrestrial large carnivores. To assess the leopard’s status, we compile 6,000 records at 2,500 locations from over 1,300 sources on its historic (post 1750) and current distribution. We map the species across Africa and Asia, delineating areas where the species is confirmed present, is possibly present, is possibly extinct or is almost certainly extinct. The leopard now occupies 25–37% of its historic range, but this obscures important differences between subspecies. Of the nine recognized subspecies, three (P. p. pardus, fusca,and saxicolor) account for 97% of the leopard’s extant range while another three (P. p. orientalis, nimr,and japonensis) have each lost as much as 98% of their historic range. Isolation, small patch sizes, and few remaining patches further threaten the six subspecies that each have less than 100,000 km 2 of extant range. Approximately 17% of extant leopard range is protected, although some endangered subspecies have far less. We found that while leopard research was increasing, research effort was primarily on the subspecies with the most remaining range whereas subspecies that are most in need of urgent attention were neglected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., et al. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:teotwa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 8,488
Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity
Fahrig, L. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · Cited by 7,879
FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure.
McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J. (1995) · doi:10.2737/pnw-gtr-351 · Cited by 5,001
Status and Ecological Effects of the World’s Largest Carnivores
Ripple, W. J., Estes, J. A., Beschta, R. L., Wilmers, C. C., Ritchie, E. G., Hebblewhite, M., Berger, J., Elmhagen, B., Letnic, M., Nelson, M. P., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1241484 · Cited by 3,667
Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes
Chapron, G., Kaczensky, P., Linnell, J. D. C., von Arx, M., Huber, D., Andrén, H., López-Bao, J. V., Adamec, M., Álvares, F., Anders, O., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1257553 · Cited by 1,868
The need for evidence-based conservation
Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M., & Knight, T. M. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018 · Cited by 1,822
(1996) · IUCN eBooks · Cited by 1,701
Dickman, A. J. (2010) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x · Cited by 1,590
Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster
Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W., & Ng, P. K. L. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.006 · Cited by 1,533
Sunquist, M., & Sunquist, F. (2002) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226518237.001.0001 · Cited by 1,179
Cited by
Scent-marking strategies of a solitary carnivore: boundary and road scent marking in the leopard
Rafiq, K., Jordan, N. R., Meloro, C., Wilson, A. M., Hayward, M. W., Wich, S. A., & McNutt, J. W. (2020) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.12.016 · Cited by 50
Øgelund Nielsen, R., Mastromonaco, G., Roy, S., Schad Eebes, K., Fienieg, E., Sliwa, A., Müller, P., Roe, S., Dorsey, C., Fazio, J., et al. (2026) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2026.111773 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobson, A. P., Gerngross, P., Lemeris Jr., J. R., Schoonover, R. F., Anco, C., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Durant, S. M., Farhadinia, M. S., Henschel, P., Kamler, J. F., Laguardia, A., Rostro-García, S., Stein, A. B., & Dollar, L.
- Venue
- PeerJ
- Publisher
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2016-05-04
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- e1974
- ISSN
- 2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2346164724
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 21.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leopard (Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7717/peerj.1974
- The paper
- Jacobson, A. P., Gerngross, P., Lemeris Jr., J. R., Schoonover, R. F., Anco, C., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Durant, S. M., Farhadinia, M. S., Henschel, P., Kamler, J. F., Laguardia, A., Rostro-García, S., Stein, A. B., & Dollar, L. (2016). Leopard (Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.