The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
kuenm: an R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent
Open accessAbstract
Background: Ecological niche modeling is a set of analytical tools with applications in diverse disciplines, yet creating these models rigorously is now a challenging task. The calibration phase of these models is critical, but despite recent attempts at providing tools for performing this step, adequate detail is still missing. Here, we present the kuenm R package, a new set of tools for performing detailed development of ecological niche models using the platform Maxent in a reproducible way. Results: This package takes advantage of the versatility of R and Maxent to enable detailed model calibration and selection, final model creation and evaluation, and extrapolation risk analysis. Best parameters for modeling are selected considering (1) statistical significance, (2) predictive power, and (3) model complexity. For final models, we enable multiple parameter sets and model transfers, making processing simpler. Users can also evaluate extrapolation risk in model transfers via mobility-oriented parity (MOP) metric. Discussion: Use of this package allows robust processes of model calibration, facilitating creation of final models based on model significance, performance, and simplicity. Model transfers to multiple scenarios, also facilitated in this package, significantly reduce time invested in performing these tasks. Finally, efficient assessments of strict-extrapolation risks in model transfers via the MOP and MESS metrics help to prevent overinterpretation in model outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists
Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y. E., & Yates, C. J. (2011) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x · Cited by 6,699
The art of modelling range-shifting species: The art of modelling range-shifting species
Elith, J., Kearney, M., & Phillips, S. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00036.x · Cited by 2,813 · cited 1×
“Although Maxent allows assessing extrapolation via the multivariate environmental similarity surface metric (MESS; Elith, Kearney & Phillips, 2010 ), the mobility-oriented parity (MOP) index, implemented in kuenm is a metric proposed by Owens et al. (2013) that offers more robust measures of…”
MethodWarren, D. L., & Seifert, S. N. (2011) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/10-1171.1 · Cited by 2,312
Cited by
Melo-Merino, S. M., Reyes-Bonilla, H., & Lira-Noriega, A. (2020) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108837 · Cited by 555
Collinearity in ecological niche modeling: Confusions and challenges
Feng, X., Park, D. S., Liang, Y., Pandey, R., & Papeş, M. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5555 · Cited by 438
Osorio‐Olvera, L., Lira‐Noriega, A., Soberón, J., Peterson, A. T., Falconi, M., Contreras‐Díaz, R. G., Martínez‐Meyer, E., Barve, V., & Barve, N. (2020) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13452 · Cited by 371
Self-citationA checklist for maximizing reproducibility of ecological niche models
Feng, X., Park, D. S., Walker, C., Peterson, A. T., Merow, C., & Papeş, M. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0972-5 · Cited by 323
Self-citationmegaSDM: Integrating dispersal and time-step analyses into species distribution models
Shipley, B. R., Bach, R., Do, Y., Strathearn, H., McGuire, J. L., & Dilkina, B. (2022) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.05450 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Cobos, M. E., Peterson, A. T., Barve, N., & Osorio-Olvera, L.
- Venue
- PeerJ
- Publisher
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2019-02-06
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- e6281
- ISSN
- 2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914721251
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 123.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.