'Fishy' Make-up on the Hook for Mercury Exposure: A Case Series
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This report examines the source and outcome of four Barbadian women with extremely high hair mercury concentrations (361-5617 µg/g inorganic mercury) due to topical application of mercury containing skin-lightening cosmetics. METHODS: Inorganic hair and urine mercury analysis was done at the toxicological centre laboratory of the Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (Standard Council of Canada accredited). The clinical examinations were performed on location at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital of Barbados. RESULTS: Urine samples [7-135 µg/L, normal < 2 µg/L] revealed elevated mercury concentrations signifying systemic exposure. Reported symptoms during the clinical examination were consistent but nonspecific to chronic mercury exposure. CONCLUSION: Evidently, cosmetics containing dangerous levels of mercury are still available for purchase in Barbados and should be entirely banned.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Use of products like Deluxe Silken can lead to symptoms of mercury poisoning including Nephrotic Syndrome.
“Deluxe Silken is approximately 14,000 times the recommended limit for Mercury and use of products of this kind can lead to symptoms of Mercury poisoning including Nephrotic Syndrome as have been documented in the US,14,29 Barbados5 and Indonesia.30”
A study by Drescher et al. conducted in Barbados in 2010 revealed that skin bleaching and not fish consumption was responsible for elevated mercury levels in middle aged women working in the fishing industry with symptoms of chronic mercury poisoning.
“A study by Drescher et al.5 conducted in Barbados in 2010 revealed that it was skin bleaching and not fish consumption that was responsible for elevated mercury levels in middle aged women working in the fishing industry with the accompanying symptoms of chronic mercury poisoning being observed.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mohammed, T., Mohammed, E., & Bascombe, S. (2017) · Journal of Public Health Research · doi:10.4081/jphr.2017.1097 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Drescher, O., Dewailly, E., Krimholtz, M., & Rutchik, J.
- Affiliations
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CA)
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital (BB)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Venue
- West Indian Medical Journal
- Publisher
- West Indian Medical Journal
- Published
- 2014-10-07
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 770-2
- ISSN
- 0043-3144 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102442469
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- West Indian Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec
- International Development Research Centre
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Keywords
- mercury exposure, inorganic mercury, hair mercury, urinary mercury, skin lightening cosmetics, cosmetic safety, Barbados, women, non-specific symptoms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review