Cited by 11Dental Health and Care UtilizationDental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Dental services for children with autism spectrum disorder: Jeremy Brown and colleagues describe a pilot study to assess how parents perceive good practice and barriers to care

Brown, Jeremy, Brown, Judith, Woodburn, Jane·2014·Learning Disability Practice

Abstract

Jeremy Brown and colleagues describe a pilot study to assess how parents perceive good practice and barriers to care

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7748/ldp2014.03.17.3.20.e1527

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 10 · Cited by 11

Authors
Brown, J., Brown, J., & Woodburn, J.
Affiliations
Edge Hill University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Brown, Jeremy
  • Brown, Judith
Venue
Learning Disability Practice
Published
2014-03-26
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
20-25
ISSN
  • 1465-8712 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-8968
OpenAlex
W200133635
Cited by
11
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning Disability Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, children, dental care, parental attitudes, barriers to care, best practices, oral health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review