The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Banishing the blues: Mary Bennett and colleagues explore users’ response to a computer-based CBT programme that can be used to treat mild and moderate depression, and make recommendations on ways to improve user experience and adherence
Abstract
Mary Bennett and colleagues explore users’ response to a computer-based CBT programme that can be used to treat mild and moderate depression, and make recommendations on ways to improve user experience and adherence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have shown that patients did not know what to expect from CCBT, even when their GPs had been reminded to inform patients about the nature of this therapy.
“Previous studies have also shown that patients did not know what to expect from CCBT, even when their GPs had been reminded to inform patients about the nature of this therapy (Bennett et al ., 2008; Fox et al ., 2004).”
From A qualitative study of patients’ experiences and acceptance of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care, Scotland (2021) · cites this paper as Bennett et al., 2008
Insufficient information for patients can lead to inappropriate referrals or an incorrect match between patients and programmes.
“Moreover, insufficient information for patients can lead to inappropriate referrals (Bennett et al ., 2008) or an incorrect match between patients and programmes (Folker et al ., 2018).”
From A qualitative study of patients’ experiences and acceptance of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care, Scotland (2021) · cites this paper as Bennett et al., 2008
Attending CCBT during regular office hours proved to be a challenge and was a reason for withdrawing from the treatment in previous studies.
“Attending CCBT during regular office hours proved to be a challenge (Titov et al ., 2010) and was a reason for withdrawing from the treatment (Bennett et al ., 2008) in previous studies.”
From A qualitative study of patients’ experiences and acceptance of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care, Scotland (2021) · cites this paper as Bennett et al., 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Du, E., Quayle, E., & Macleod, H. (2021) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x21000210 · Cited by 5
“It was guided by research on patients ’ experiences (Beattie et al ., 2009; Bennett et al ., 2008) to gain as much knowledge as possible and a better understanding of patients ’ perspectives and their satisfaction and acceptance of CCBT services.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, M., Harris, N., Learmonth, D., & Rai, S.
- Affiliations
- Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Venue
- Mental Health Practice
- Publisher
- RCN Publishing Ltd.
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 32-36
- ISSN
- 1465-8720 (ISSN-L)
- 2047-895X
- OpenAlex
- W2329706204
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mental Health Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- depression, user experience, medication adherence, user response, digital mental health interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
