Cited by 6Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMental Health and Patient InvolvementHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Shared decision making in psychiatric medicines management: When service users can participate in consultations, there are positive outcomes for everyone involved, say Mary Jane O’Sullivan and Sarah Rae

O’Sullivan, Mary Jane, Rae, Sarah·2014·Mental Health Practice

Abstract

When service users can participate in consultations, there are positive outcomes for everyone involved, say Mary Jane O’Sullivan and Sarah Rae

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7748/mhp2014.05.17.8.16.e889

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with severe mental disorders report a greater desire to be involved in clinical decision-making and a need to have a say in the process of care than individuals receiving assistance for other medical conditions.

    “This has been especially highlighted in the case of patients with severe mental disorders who report a greater desire of being involved in clinical decision-making and a need to have a say in the process of care, as compared to individuals receiving assistance for other medical conditions [8–11].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Sullivan, M. J., & Rae, S.
Affiliations
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
O’Sullivan, Mary Jane
Venue
Mental Health Practice
Published
2014-05-09
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
16-22
ISSN
  • 1465-8720 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-895X
OpenAlex
W2227587487
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mental Health Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
shared decision-making, medication management, service user involvement, mental health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review