Shared decision making in psychiatric medicines management: When service users can participate in consultations, there are positive outcomes for everyone involved, say Mary Jane O’Sullivan and Sarah Rae
Abstract
When service users can participate in consultations, there are positive outcomes for everyone involved, say Mary Jane O’Sullivan and Sarah Rae
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with severe mental disorders report a greater desire to be involved in clinical decision-making and a need to have a say in the process of care than individuals receiving assistance for other medical conditions.
“This has been especially highlighted in the case of patients with severe mental disorders who report a greater desire of being involved in clinical decision-making and a need to have a say in the process of care, as compared to individuals receiving assistance for other medical conditions [8–11].”
From The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: A clinical review (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shared decision making for psychiatric medication management: beyond the micro‐social
Morant, N., Kaminskiy, E., & Ramon, S. (2016) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12392 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Fiorillo, A., Barlati, S., Bellomo, A., Corrivetti, G., Nicolò, G., Sampogna, G., Stanga, V., Veltro, F., Maina, G., & Vita, A. (2020) · Annals of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12991-020-00293-4 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of the Legal Considerations Surrounding Medicines Management
Vaismoradi, M., Jordan, S. E., Logan, P., Amaniyan, S., & Glarcher, M. (2021) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina57010065 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Shared decision-making in medication management: Development of a training intervention
Stead, U., Morant, N. J., & Ramon, S. (2017) · BJPsych Bulletin · doi:10.1192/pb.bp.116.053819 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Hipp, K., Kuosmanen, L., Repo‐Tiihonen, E., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.12427 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“…participation in regular medication, including the importance of their knowledge of medication, active role they play in medication decisions, and their partnership with professionals with regard to administering medications (Lorem et al. 2014; Mikesell et al. 2016; O’Sullivan & Rae 2014).”
Stefančić, A., Rogers, R. T., Styke, S., Xu, X., Buchsbaum, R., Nossel, I. R., Cabassa, L. J., Stroup, T. S., & Kimhy, D. (2022) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/41482 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- O’Sullivan, M. J., & Rae, S.
- Affiliations
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- O’Sullivan, Mary Jane
- ORCID
- Rae, Sarah
- Venue
- Mental Health Practice
- Publisher
- RCN Publishing Ltd.
- Published
- 2014-05-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 16-22
- ISSN
- 1465-8720 (ISSN-L)
- 2047-895X
- OpenAlex
- W2227587487
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mental Health Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Keywords
- shared decision-making, medication management, service user involvement, mental health services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review