Cited by 119Antibiotic Use and ResistancePharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence, Pattern, and Reasons for Self-Medication: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study From Central India

Open access

Abstract

Introduction Self-medication is an important public health problem, with varied prevalence across the world. The high prevalence of self-medication in India is one of the important factors contributing to the development of antimicrobial resistance. Self-medication without medical guidance can lead to inappropriate, incorrect, or undue therapy, missed diagnosis, delays in appropriate treatment, pathogen resistance, and increased morbidity. The growing trend of self-medication can be attributed to various factors like the urge for self-care, sympathy toward sick family members, inaccessible health services and nonavailability of drugs, time and financial constraints, ignorance, misbeliefs, extensive advertisement and availability of drugs in places other than drug shops. Methodology The present community-based descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in an urban field practice area of a tertiary health care center (UHTC) in Central India. Individuals above 18 years of age and present at home at the time of the house-to-house survey comprised the study participants. A total of 400 participants were enrolled in the study. Data were collected using a predesigned and pretested questionnaire by the face-to-face interview technique. Results The prevalence of self-medication in the area was 60 % (240). The most widely used drugs for self-medication were analgesics (159; 66.25%) and antipyretics (142; 59.16%). Common ailments for which self-medication was used frequently were fever, body aches, common cold, and cough. It was observed that female participants were twice more likely to self-medicate as compared to male participants (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.04; Prevalence (p) = 0.014, Confidence Interval (CI) 95% = 1.15-3.62). Additionally, those having education above the high school level had more chances of self-medicating than those educated less than high school (OR: 1.25; p≤0.014, CI 95%=1.05-1.50). The commonest reasons for resorting to self-medication as per the findings of the present study are that it saves time and the condition was not serious enough to warrant a physician's consultation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.33917

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 26 references

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Basu C. ‘Self-care’ as healing behaviour: a study from urban slum and surrounding non-slum areas of North 24 Parganas district of West Bengal. Semantic Scholar. 2018,
  2. Balamurugan E, Ganesh K. Prevalence and pattern of self medication use in coastal regions of South India. British Journal of General Practitioners. 2011, 4:428-31.
  3. Machado-Alba JE, Echeverri-Cataño LF, Londoño-Builes MJ, Moreno-Gutiérrez PA, Ochoa-Orozco SA, Ruiz-Villa JO. Social, cultural and economic factors associated with self-medication. Biomedica. 2014, 34:580-8.
  4. Esuvat-Moses A, Mgabo MR, Mwabamba G, Mrema JG, Kajeguka DC. Prevalence and knowledge of self-medication: a cross-sectional study in Mbeya Urban, southwestern Tanzania. J Pathol Microbiol. 2017, 2:1014.
  5. Keshari SS, Kesarwani P, Sengar MM. Prevalence and pattern of self-medication practices in rural area of Barabanki. Indian J Med Res. 2014, 25:636-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rathod, P., Sharma, S., Ukey, U., Sonpimpale, B., Ughade, S., Narlawar, U., Gaikwad, S., Nair, P., Masram, P., & Pandey, S.
Affiliations
Government Medical College (IN)
Corresponding author
Sharma, Sarita
Venue
Cureus
Published
2023-01-18
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
e33917-e33917
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4317211576
Cited by
101
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 5
FWCI
19.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
self-medication, prevalence, analgesics, antipyretics, antimicrobial resistance, reasons for self-medication, gender differences, educational attainment, common cold, fever, urban communities, Central India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review