Evolution of diagnostic and forensic microbiology in the era of artificial intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Diagnostic microbiology plays a vital role in managing infectious diseases, combating antimicrobial resistance, and containment of outbreaks. During the fourth industrial revolution, when artificial intelligence (AI) became an essential part of our day-to-day lives, its integration into healthcare would further revolutionize our knowledge and potential. Although in the budding stage, AI with machine learning is being increasingly utilized in various aspects of diagnostic microbiology. It can handle large datasets that are difficult to analyze manually. Researchers have developed and demonstrated several machine-learning algorithms for interpreting bacterial cultures, conducting image analysis for microbial detection, and predicting antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Thus, AI may most likely be the ultimate solution to the ever-increasing demand for improved results with shorter turnaround times. AI can also assist forensic microbiologists in crime scene investigations, as it can guide individual identification, cause and time since death, and manner of death. This review summarizes the application of AI in diagnostic microbiology for performing diverse sets of microbial investigations and is an essential aid in forensic microbiology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI with machine learning is being used to diagnose microbial infections, which can be immense for training and educating technicians in microbiology.
“Similarly, AI with machine learning is being used to diagnose microbial infections, which can be immense for training and educating technicians in microbiology [23].”
From Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing the Field of Medical Education (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125619864925 · Cited by 2,655 · see citing works
Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine
Mintz, Y., & Brodie, R. (2019) · Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies · doi:10.1080/13645706.2019.1575882 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Evaluation of artificial intelligence techniques in disease diagnosis and prediction
Nia, N. G., Kaplanoğlu, E., & Nasab, A. (2023) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-023-00049-5 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Nguyen, M., Long, S. W., McDermott, P. F., Olsen, R. J., Olson, R., Stevens, R. L., Tyson, G. H., Zhao, S., & Davis, J. J. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01260-18 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Capturing Whole-Genome Characteristics in Short Sequences Using a Naïve Bayesian ClassifierPreprint
Sandberg, R., Winberg, G., Brändén, C., Kaske, A., Ernberg, I. T., & Cöster, J. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186401 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence approaches and mechanisms for big data analytics: a systematic study
Rahmani, A. M., Azhir, E., Ali, S., Mohammadi, M., Ahmed, O. H., Ghafour, M. Y., Ahmed, S. H., & Hosseinzadeh, M. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.488 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Johnson, H., Trinidad, D., Guzman, S., Khan, Z., Parziale, J. V., DeBruyn, J. M., & Lents, N. H. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167370 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Machine learning for data integration in human gut microbiome
Li, P., Luo, H., Ji, B., & Nielsen, J. (2022) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-022-01973-4 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Machine learning in the clinical microbiology laboratory: has the time come for routine practice?
Peiffer‐Smadja, N., Dellière, S., Rodriguez, C., Birgand, G., Lescure, F.-X., Fourati, S., & Ruppé, É. (2020) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.006 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Microbial forensics: new breakthroughs and future prospects
Oliveira, M. T. D. S., & Amorim, A. (2018) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-018-9414-6 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Laboratory automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose?
Croxatto, A., Prod’hom, G., Faverjon, F., Rochais, Y., & Greub, G. (2016) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.09.030 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Huang, J., Deng, K., Zhang, J., Qin, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Tuo, Y., Chen, L., et al. (2019) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109922 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Mathison, B. A., Kohan, J. L., Walker, J. F., Smith, R. B., Ardon, O., & Couturier, M. R. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02053-19 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Feucherolles, M., Nennig, M., Becker, S. L., Martiny, D., Losch, S., Penny, C., Cauchie, H., & Ragimbeau, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.804484 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
López, C. D., Vidaki, A., Ralf, A., González, D. M., Radjabzadeh, D., Kraaij, R., Uitterlinden, A. G., Haas, C., Lao, Ó., & Kayser, M. (2019) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.03.015 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Yang, J., Tsukimi, T., Yoshikawa, M., Suzuki, K. T., Takeda, T., Tomita, M., & Fukuda, S. (2019) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00594-19 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Rhoads, D. D. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00511-20 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Woods: A fast and accurate functional annotator and classifier of genomic and metagenomic sequences
Sharma, A. K., Gupta, A., Kumar, S., Dhakan, D. B., & Sharma, V. K. (2015) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.04.001 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence, nano-technology and genomic medicine: The future of anaesthesia
Naaz, S., & Asghar, A. (2022) · Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.4103/joacp.joacp_139_20 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Trends in forensic microbiology: From classical methods to deep learning
Yuan, H., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, F., Guan, D., & Zhao, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1163741 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine as a strategic valuable tool
Larentzakis, A. V., & Lygerōs, N. (2021) · Pan African Medical Journal · doi:10.11604/pamj.2021.38.184.28197 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Integrating Artificial Intelligence for Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis - a Review.
Undru, T. R., Uday, U., Lakshmi, J. T., et al. (2022) · PubMed · doi:10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.420 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
A history of the MetaSUB consortium: Tracking urban microbes around the globe
Ryon, K. A., Tierney, B. T., Frolova, A., et al. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104993 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Implementation for the Analysis of Urine Culture
Alouani, D. J., Ransom, E. M., Jani, M., Burnham, C. D., Rhoads, D. D., & Sadri, N. (2021) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvab270 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Advances in microbial metagenomics and artificial intelligence analysis in forensic identification
He, Q., Niu, X., Qi, R., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1046733 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A machine learning framework to determine geolocations from metagenomic profiling
Huang, L., Xu, C., Yang, W., et al. (2020) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/s13062-020-00278-z · Cited by 18 · see citing works
DeYoung, B., Morales, M., & Giglio, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.976068 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence as evidence
Seng, D. K. B. (2025) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781035316496.00026 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing the Field of Medical Education
Narayanan, S., Ramakrishnan, R., Durairaj, E., & Das, A. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.49604 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Mishra, A., Khan, S., Das, A., & Das, B. C.
- Affiliations
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Madurai (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Das, Arghya
- Venue
- Cureus
- Published
- 2023-09-21
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e45738-e45738
- ISSN
- 2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10590455
- OpenAlex
- W4386966220
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, machine learning, microbiological diagnosis, forensic microbiology, antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial susceptibility prediction, postmortem interval estimation, cause of death determination, manner of death determination, individual identification, epidemic containment, infectious disease diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review