Cited by 2Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchAnalytical chemistry methods developmentToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Polyfluoroalkyl-Substances Detection in Junk Food Packing Materials Using Various Analytical Methods: A Review

Open access
S, Jayanthy, Kannaiah, Kanaka Parvathi, Narayanasamy, Damodharan·2024·Cureus

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are unseen, dangerous organic compounds that can cause major health disorders. PFASs have been categorized as persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT). This review provides knowledge about the PFASs present in junk food packaging materials, which can migrate into the food. Different types of samples were analyzed using the analytical methods. The most preferred method of extraction is ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE). It summarizes the analytical approaches of PFASs. The results of numerous studies show that perfluorooctanoic acid is the most often detected compound with high concentrations. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) announced that the tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of PFASs is 4.4 ng/kg. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced the limit for perfluorobutane sulfonic acid due to its toxicity level. These compounds have potential effects on both people's health and the biosphere. PFAS usage has to stop in the industries for a better future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.70301

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PFAS-based tubing and catheters are widely used for intravenous fluid delivery, blood transfusion, and vascular access procedures.

    “Blood contact devices: PFAS-based tubing and catheters are widely used for intravenous fluid delivery, blood transfusion, and vascular access procedures.”

    From Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Healthcare: Environmental and Clinical Insights (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction and background discusses broad industrial uses of PFAS, while the Review focuses on detecting PFAS in food packaging; neither addresses blood-contact devices. Searches for catheters, intravenous delivery, blood transfusion, vascular access, and medical tubing found no passage supporting the claimed uses. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The inert surfaces of PFAS-based blood contact devices reduce hemolysis and thrombogenicity.

    “Their inert surfaces reduce hemolysis and thrombogenicity [19].”

    From Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Healthcare: Environmental and Clinical Insights (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction and background discusses PFAS resistance and uses in food packaging, while the Review addresses PFAS detection and health risks; neither section addresses blood-contact devices. Searches for hemolysis, thrombogenicity, and blood-contacting devices found no passage supporting the claimed reduction. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Development of non-targeted workflows for analysis SSRN Stroski KM Sapozhnikova Y Taylor RB Harron A 4784805 39 2024 https://ssrn.com/abstract 38797214

Authors
S, J., Kannaiah, K. P., & Narayanasamy, D.
Affiliations
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Kannaiah, Kanaka Parvathi
Venue
Cureus
Published
2024-09-27
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
e70301-e70301
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402929853
Cited by
2
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, food packaging materials, food packaging migration, junk food, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFBS, ultrasound-assisted extraction, analytical methods, tolerable weekly intake

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review