Cited by 112Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in HealthcareEthics and Social Impacts of AI

DeepSeek in Healthcare: Revealing Opportunities and Steering Challenges of a New Open-Source Artificial Intelligence Frontier

Open access
Temsah, Abdulrahman, Alhasan, Khalid, Altamimi, Ibraheem, Jamal, Amr, Al-Eyadhy, Ayman, Malki, Khalid H, Temsah, Mohamad-Hani·2025·Cureus

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has driven several advancements in healthcare, with large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and Microsoft's Copilot demonstrating potential in clinical decision support, medical education, and research acceleration. However, their closed-source architecture, high computational costs, and limited adaptability to specialized medical contexts remained key barriers to universal adoption. Now, with the rise of DeepSeek's DeepThink (R1), an open-source LLM, gaining prominence since mid-January 2025, new opportunities and challenges emerge for healthcare integration and AI-driven research. Unlike proprietary models, DeepSeek fosters continuous learning by leveraging publicly available open-source datasets, possibly enhancing adaptability to the ever-evolving medical knowledge and scientific reasoning. Its transparent, community-driven approach may enable greater customization, regional specialization, and collaboration among data researchers and clinicians. Additionally, DeepSeek supports offline deployment, addressing some data privacy concerns. Despite these promising advantages, DeepSeek presents ethical and regulatory challenges. Users' data privacy worries have emerged, with concerns about user data retention policies and potential developer access to user-generated content without opt-out options. Additionally, when used in healthcare applications, its compliance with China's data-sharing regulations highlights the urgent need for clear international data privacy and governance. Furthermore, like other LLMs, DeepSeek may face limitations related to inherent biases, hallucinations, and output reliability, which warrants rigorous validation and human oversight before clinical application. This editorial explores DeepSeek's potential role in clinical workflows, medical education, and research while also highlighting its challenges related to security, accuracy, and responsible AI governance. With careful implementation, ethical considerations, and international collaboration, DeepSeek and similar LLMs could enhance healthcare innovation, providing cost-effective, scalable AI solutions while ensuring human expertise remains at the forefront of patient care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.79221

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Temsah, A., Alhasan, K., Altamimi, I., Jamal, A., Al-Eyadhy, A., Malki, K. H., & Temsah, M.-H.
Affiliations
  • Alfaisal University (SA)
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA)
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • King Saud Medical City (SA)
Corresponding author
Temsah, Mohamad-Hani
Venue
Cureus
Published
2025-02-18
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
e79221-e79221
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407696986
Cited by
112
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
DeepSeek, open-source large language models, clinical decision support, medical education, data privacy, data governance, AI hallucination, algorithmic bias, responsible AI governance, offline deployment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review