DeepSeek in Healthcare: Revealing Opportunities and Steering Challenges of a New Open-Source Artificial Intelligence Frontier
Open accessAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has driven several advancements in healthcare, with large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and Microsoft's Copilot demonstrating potential in clinical decision support, medical education, and research acceleration. However, their closed-source architecture, high computational costs, and limited adaptability to specialized medical contexts remained key barriers to universal adoption. Now, with the rise of DeepSeek's DeepThink (R1), an open-source LLM, gaining prominence since mid-January 2025, new opportunities and challenges emerge for healthcare integration and AI-driven research. Unlike proprietary models, DeepSeek fosters continuous learning by leveraging publicly available open-source datasets, possibly enhancing adaptability to the ever-evolving medical knowledge and scientific reasoning. Its transparent, community-driven approach may enable greater customization, regional specialization, and collaboration among data researchers and clinicians. Additionally, DeepSeek supports offline deployment, addressing some data privacy concerns. Despite these promising advantages, DeepSeek presents ethical and regulatory challenges. Users' data privacy worries have emerged, with concerns about user data retention policies and potential developer access to user-generated content without opt-out options. Additionally, when used in healthcare applications, its compliance with China's data-sharing regulations highlights the urgent need for clear international data privacy and governance. Furthermore, like other LLMs, DeepSeek may face limitations related to inherent biases, hallucinations, and output reliability, which warrants rigorous validation and human oversight before clinical application. This editorial explores DeepSeek's potential role in clinical workflows, medical education, and research while also highlighting its challenges related to security, accuracy, and responsible AI governance. With careful implementation, ethical considerations, and international collaboration, DeepSeek and similar LLMs could enhance healthcare innovation, providing cost-effective, scalable AI solutions while ensuring human expertise remains at the forefront of patient care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings extend existing concerns about the dual-edged nature of generative AI by showing that its benefits and risks are mediated by identifiable interaction profiles rather than by technology use alone.
“The findings therefore extend existing concerns about the dual-edged nature of generative AI by showing that its benefits and risks are mediated by identifiable interaction profiles rather than by technology use alone [24, 48, 53].”
From From adoption to interaction: examining human-GenAI engagement patterns, ethical tensions, and educational trade-offs in nursing education (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: implications in scientific writing
Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.35179 · Cited by 1,540 · see citing works
Creation and Adoption of Large Language Models in Medicine
Shah, N. H., Entwistle, D., & Pfeffer, M. A. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.14217 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
A Call to Address AI “Hallucinations” and How Healthcare Professionals Can Mitigate Their Risks
Hatem, R., Simmons, B., & Thornton, J. E. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.44720 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Aljamaan, F., Temsah, M.-H., Altamimi, I., Al-Eyadhy, A., Jamal, A., Alhasan, K., Mesallam, T. A., Farahat, M., & Malki, K. H. (2024) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/54345 · Cited by 166 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Studies have highlighted issues such as inherent biases and the phenomenon of "hallucinations," where models generate plausible but incorrect or nonsensical information [6,7].”
Self-citationCreating Trustworthy LLMs: Dealing with Hallucinations in Healthcare AIPreprint
Ahmad, M. Z., Yaramic, I., & Roy, T. D. (2023) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202310.1662.v1 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism
DeepSeek-AI, :, Bi, X., Chen, D., Chen, G., Chen, S., Dai, D., Deng, C., Ding, H., Dong, K., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.02954 · Cited by 99 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The open-source nature of DeepSeek's DeepThink R1 may empower innovation among international scholars [9].”
Creating Trustworthy LLMs: Dealing with Hallucinations in Healthcare AI
Ahmad, M. A., Yaramis, I., & Roy, T. D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.01463 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Chinese firm’s large language model makes a splash
Normile, D. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adv9836 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
OpenAI o1-Preview vs. ChatGPT in Healthcare: A New Frontier in Medical AI Reasoning
Temsah, M.-H. A., Jamal, A. A., Alhasan, K. A., Temsah, A. A., & Malki, K. H. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.70640 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationJamal, A. A., Solaiman, M., Alhasan, K. A., Temsah, M.-H. A., & Sayed, G. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.43036 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationMondillo, G., Colosimo, S., Perrotta, A., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.01.27.25321169 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Transforming Virtual Healthcare: The Potentials of ChatGPT-4omni in Telemedicine
Temsah, M.-H. A., Jamal, A. A., Alhasan, K. A., Aljamaan, F., Altamimi, I., Malki, K. H., Temsah, A., Ohannessian, R., & Al-Eyadhy, A. A. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.61377 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationHow should we test AI for human-level intelligence? OpenAI’s o3 electrifies quest
Jones, N. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00110-6 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence, Data Protection, Privacy, and Doxxing
Copeland‐Halperin, L. R., & Oppikofer, C. (2024) · Aesthetic Surgery Journal · doi:10.1093/asj/sjae219 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Xu, S., Hua, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.11134 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
OpenAI’s Transformation: From a Non-profit to a 157 Billion Valuation
Andhov, A. (2025) · Business Law Review · doi:10.54648/bula2025003 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
OpenAI’s Transformation: From a Non-profit to a 100 Billion ValuationPreprint
Andhov, A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4750197 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Developing locally trainable large language models
Chen, H. (2025) · doi:10.32657/10356/182242 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yang, M., Long, J., He, Y., Meng, R., Ling, C., Long, Q., & Wen, J. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-05132-7
“Likewise, review-oriented works such as Allen [2], Desmedt [18], and Temsah et al. [48] place DeepSeek within the broader AI transformation in higher education and healthcare.”
- Authors
- Temsah, A., Alhasan, K., Altamimi, I., Jamal, A., Al-Eyadhy, A., Malki, K. H., & Temsah, M.-H.
- Affiliations
- Alfaisal University (SA)
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA)
- King Saud University (SA)
- King Saud Medical City (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Temsah, Mohamad-Hani
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cureus
- Published
- 2025-02-18
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e79221-e79221
- ISSN
- 2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11836063
- OpenAlex
- W4407696986
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- DeepSeek, open-source large language models, clinical decision support, medical education, data privacy, data governance, AI hallucination, algorithmic bias, responsible AI governance, offline deployment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review