Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skillsamong Technical Education Students

Open access
Heong, Yee Mei, Othman, Widad Binti, Yunos, Jailani Bin Md, Kiong, Tee Tze, Hassan, Razali Bin, Mohamad, Mimi Mohaffyza Binti·2011·International Journal of Social Science and Humanity

Abstract

Higher order thinking skills is an important aspect in teaching and learning especially at higher education institutions.Thinking skills practices are part of the generic skills that should be infused in all technical subjects.Students with higher order thinking skills are able to learn, improve their performance and reduce their weaknesses.Hence, the purpose of this research was to identify the level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills among technical education students in the Faculty of Technical Education (FPTek), Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.A total of 158 students of FPTek were randomly selected as sample.A set of questionnaires adapted from Marzano Rubrics for Specific Task or Situations (1993) was used as research instrument.This is a quantitative research and the gathered data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software.The findings indicated that students perceived they have moderate level for investigation, experimental inquiry, comparing, deducing, constructing support, inducing and invention.However, decision making, problem solving, error analyzing, abstracting, analyzing perspectives and classifying are at low level.The Eta analysis indicated that there is a very low positive relationship between the level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills and gender, academic achivement as well as socio economic status.Besides that, the findings also showed that there is no statistically significant difference in gender, academic achivement and socio economic status on the level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills.However, there is significant difference in socio economic status on the level of decision making.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7763/ijssh.2011.v1.20

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B., & Mohamad, M. M. B.
Venue
International Journal of Social Science and Humanity
Published
2011
Pages
121-125
ISSN
2010-3646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334052488
Cited by
355
References
17
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.