Cited by 2Linguistics and Discourse AnalysisDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesCultural and political discourse analysis

Método de Abordajes Lingüísticos Convergentes para el ACD: una propuesta aplicada al análisis de comentarios digitales

Open access
Marchese, Mariana Carolina·2022·Onomázein

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to present a way of approaching the study of discourses from the interpretative paradigm, based on the ACD in its Latin American side as a theoretical framework and applying a predominantly qualitative and inductive methodology. This is the Method of Converging Linguistic Approaches for CDA. This method deepens the analysis of texts (written or oral) as sociodiscursive units and their purpose is to reflect on social phenomena and problems from data obtained in linguistic-discursive analysis. In this case, from the analysis of digital comments derived from a piece of news referring to the housing problem of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, it is illustrated how the method enables to study, first, the discursive categorization and, second, the focused categories including the most predominant ones.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7764/onomazein.55.06

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. de Barros, Solange, y otros, 2016: "Realismo crítico e análise de discurso crítica: hibridismos de fronteiras epistemológicas", Polifonia 23 (33), 11-28.
  2. de melo resende, Viviane, 2009a: "'It's not a matter of inhumanity': a critical discourse analysis of an apartment building circular on homeless people", Discourse & Society. An International Journal for the Study of Discourse and Communication in their Social, Political and Cultural Contexts 20 (3), 363-379.
  3. de melo resende, Viviane, y Mariana Carolina marCHese, 2011: "'São as pessoas pobrezitas de espírito que agudizam a pobreza dos pobres': análise discursiva crítica de testemunho publi- cado na revista Cais -o método sincrónico-diacrônico", Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade (Papers on Languaje and Society) 12 (2), 150-178.
  4. de melo resende, Viviane, y otros, 2017: "Pobreza y periodismo ¿Prácticas transformadoras? In- troducción", Sur le Journalisme 6 (1), 30-37.
  5. duarte, Mercedes, 2013: "Redes de metáforas cognitivas en el discurso político: 'el socia- lismo del siglo XXI' de Hugo Chávez", Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Discurso 13 (1), 57-78.
  6. FairClougH, Norman, 1992: Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publisher.
  7. garCía da silva, Denize, 2007: "Critical Discourse Analysis and the functional bases of language" en Leila BarBara y Tony BerBer sardinHa (eds.): Proceedings of the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress, São Paulo: PUCSP, 932-949.
  8. guBa, Egon, e Yvonna linColn, 1998: "Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research" en Norman denzin e Yvonna linColn (eds.): The Landscape of Qualitative Research. Theories and Issues, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 195-220.
  9. HuFFman, Alan, 2001: "The linguistics of William Diver and the Columbia school", Word 52 (1), 29-68.
  10. janosCHka, Michael, y Jorge sequera, 2016: "Gentrification in Latin America: addressing the poli- tics and geographies of displacement", Urban Geography 37 (8), 1175-1194.
  11. lavandera, Beatriz, 1986: "Decir y aludir: una propuesta metodológica", Cuadernos del Instituto de Lingüística 1 (1), 1-14.
  12. marCHese, Mariana Carolina, y Matías soiCH, 2016: "'¿Te tengo que seguir hablando de…?': reflexio- nes y sugerencias metodológicas para trabajar a partir de la desigualdad comunicativa en la toma de historias de vida", Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade (Papers on Languaje and Society) 17 (1), 194-216.
  13. martínez, Clarisa, 2004/2005: "Juegos de reconocimiento del derecho al espacio urbano en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. El caso de la política de radicación de villas", Revista Lavboratorio. Estudios sobre el Cambio Estructural y la Desigualdad Social 6 (16), 26-31.
  14. menéndez, Martín, 2002: "Los límites y los métodos: el caso del Análisis Crítico del Discurso", Revista Iberoamericana de Discurso y Sociedad. Lenguaje en Contexto desde una Perspectiva Crítica y Multidisciplinaria 4 (1), 3-8.
  15. monteCino, Lésmer (ed.), 2010: Discurso, pobreza y exclusión en América Latina, Santiago: Cuarto Propio.
  16. pardo, María Laura, 1986: "Hacia una redefinición de las nociones de tema y rema. De la oración al discurso", Cuadernos del Instituto de Lingüística 1 (1), 59-93.
  17. pardo, María Laura, 2001: "La expresión discursiva del mandato. Análisis lingüístico del texto de la ley de reforma laboral argentina", Revista Iberoamericana de Discurso y Sociedad. Len- guaje en Contexto desde una Perspectiva Crítica y Multidisciplinaria 3 (2), 117-137.
  18. pardo, María Laura, 2008: "Una metodología para la investigación lingüística del discurso" en María Laura pardo (ed.): El discurso de la pobreza en América Latina. Estudio de la Red Latinoa- mericana de Análisis Crítico del Discurso, Santiago: Frasis, 55-78.
  19. pardo, María Laura, 2010: "Latin-American Critical Discourse Studies: state of the art and new perspectives", Journal of Multicultural Discourses 5 (3), 183-192.
  20. pardo, María Laura, 2016: "Introduction: LatinAmerican Cultural-Critical Studies" en sHi-Xu, Kwesi Kwaa praH y María Laura pardo: Discourses of the Developing World. Researching pro- perties, problems and potentials of the developing world, Oxford UK: Routledge. Taylor and Francis Group, 127-135.
  21. sHi-Xu, 2009: "Reconstructing Eastern paradigms of discourse studies", Journal of Multicultural Discourses 4 (1), 29-48.
  22. sHi-Xu y otros, 2016: Discourses of the Developing World. Researching properties, problems and potentials of the developing world, Oxford UK: Routledge.
  23. sHiro, Martha, 2012: "El método tampoco viene del aire…", Revista de la Asociación Latinoame- ricana del Estudios del Discurso 12 (2), 3-6.
  24. soiCH, Matías, 2019: "La exclusión empieza por casa. Análisis crítico de la construcción de la repre- sentación discursiva de la identidad de género trans en relación con la familia y otros actores sociales", Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade (Papers on Languaje and Society) 20 (1), 173-200.
  25. toulmin, Stephen, 1958: The uses of argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. van dijk, Teun, 1993: "Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis", Discourse & Society. An Inter- national Journal for the Study of Discourse and Communication in their Social, Political and Cultural Contexts 4 (2), 249-283.
  27. Wodak, Ruth, 2000: "¿La Sociolingüística necesita una Teoría Social? Nuevas perspectivas en Análisis Crítico del Discurso", Revista Iberoamericana de Discurso y Sociedad. Lenguaje en Contexto desde una Perspectiva Crítica y Multidisciplinaria 2 (3), 123-147.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marchese, M. C.
Affiliations
Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
Corresponding author
Marchese, Mariana Carolina
Venue
Onomázein
Published
2022-05-05
Issue
55
Pages
92-114
ISSN
  • 0717-1285 (ISSN-L)
  • 0718-5758
OpenAlex
W4226371442
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • ONOMAZEIN (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
Keywords
discourse analysis, interpretative paradigm, social media discourse, housing problems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review