Future Challenges of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in Nursing: What Can We Learn from Monsters in Popular Culture?
Open accessAbstract
It is highly likely that artificial intelligence (AI) will be implemented in nursing robotics in various forms, both in medical and surgical robotic instruments, but also as different types of droids and humanoids, physical reinforcements, and also animal/pet robots. Exploring and discussing AI and robotics in nursing and health care before these tools become commonplace is of great importance. We propose that monsters in popular culture might be studied with the hope of learning about situations and relationships that generate empathic capacities in their monstrous existences. The aim of the article is to introduce the theoretical framework and assumptions behind this idea. Both robots and monsters are posthuman creations. The knowledge we present here gives ideas about how nursing science can address the postmodern, technologic, and global world to come. Monsters therefore serve as an entrance to explore technologic innovations such as AI. Analyzing when and why monsters step out of character can provide important insights into the conceptualization of caring and nursing as a science, which is important for discussing these empathic protocols, as well as more general insight into human knowledge. The relationship between caring, monsters, robotics, and AI is not as farfetched as it might seem at first glance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [34]34. www.caringmonsters.com [Internet] Stockholm, Sweden: CaringMonsters.com; 2015. May 27, [cited 2016 Apr 20]. Available from: www.caringmonsters.com. [Google Scholar] 35.Shelly M. Frankenstein; or, the modern. Prometheus Berkshire, United Kingdom: Cox & Wyman; 1994. [Google Scholar] 36.Mitchell D. In the Flesh. [television series] London, United Kingdom: BBC Drama Productions; 2013 Mar 17–2014 Jun 8. [Google Scholar] Articles from The Permanente Journal are provided here courtesy of The Permanente Federation LLC
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611 · see citing works
Ronquillo, C. E., Peltonen, L., Pruinelli, L., Chu, C. H., Bakken, S., Beduschi, A., Cato, K., Hardiker, N., Junger, A., Michalowski, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14855 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Can nurses remain relevant in a technologically advanced future?
Pepito, J. A., & Locsin, R. (2019) · International Journal of Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.09.013 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Shinners, L., Aggar, C., Grace, S., & Smith, S. (2020) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458219874641 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Ergin, E., Karaarslan, D., Şahan, S., & Çınar Yücel, Ş. (2022) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.13646 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Ergin, E., Karaarslan, D., Şahan, S., & Bingöl, Ü. (2023) · Journal of Robotic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11701-023-01592-0 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
A Concept Analysis on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing
Shang, Z. (2021) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.14857 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Dante, A., Marcotullio, A., Masotta, V., Caponnetto, V., La Cerra, C., Bertocchi, L., Petrucci, C., & Alfes, C. M. (2021) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52287-2_11 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Erikson, H., & Salzmann-Erikson, M.
- Affiliations
- Röda Korsets Högskola (SE)
- Associate Professor in Nursing of Health and Occupational Studies in the Department of Health and Caring Sciences at the University of Gävle in Sweden..
- Venue
- The Permanente Journal
- Publisher
- The Permanente Federation
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 15-243
- ISSN
- 1552-5767 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5775
- PMC
- PMC4991908
- OpenAlex
- W2472811553
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Permanente Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Literary and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in nursing, monsters in popular culture, empathy, posthumanism, caring, nursing science, humanoid robots, pet robots, medical robotics, human-robot relationships
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Nursing Care, Robotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review