Cited by 221Nursing Roles and PracticesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationNursing education and management

Can nurses remain relevant in a technologically advanced future?

Open access
Pepito, Joseph Andrew, Locsin, Rozzano·2019·International Journal of Nursing Sciences

Abstract

Technological breakthroughs occur at an ever-increasing rate thereby revolutionizing human health and wellness care. Technological advancements have drastically changed the structure and organization of the healthcare industry. McKinsey Global Institute estimates that 800 million workers worldwide could be replaced by robots by the year 2030. There is already a robotic revolution happening in healthcare wherein robots have made tasks and procedures more efficient and safer. Locsin and Ito has addressed the threat to nursing practice with human nurses being replaced by humanoid robots. Routine nursing care dictated solely by prescribed procedures and accomplishment of nursing tasks would be best performed by machines. With the future practice of nursing in a technologically advanced future transcending the implementation of nursing actions to achieve predictable outcomes, how can human nurses remain relevant as practitioners of nursing? Nurses should be involved in deciding which aspects of their practice can be delegated to technology. Nurses should oversee the introduction of automated technology and artificial intelligence ensuring their practice to be more about the universal aspects of human care continuing under a novel system. Nursing education and nursing research will change to encompass a differentiated demand for professional nursing practice with, and not for, robots in healthcare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.09.013

Cites

35 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [7]IBM IBM research unveils two new watson related projects from cleveland clinic collaboration Retrieved from IBM: http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/42203.wss 2013, October 15
  2. [16]Aly A. Griffiths S. Stramandinoli F. Metrics and benchmarks in human-robot interaction: recent advances in cognitive robotics Cognit Syst Res 43 2017 313 323 10.1016/J.COGSYS.2016.06.002 · DOI
  3. [22]Khader N. Lashier A. Yoon S.W. Pharmacy robotic dispensing and planogram analysis using association rule mining with prescription data Expert Syst Appl 57 2016 296 310 10.1016/J.ESWA.2016.02.045 · DOI
  4. [26]RBR Staff Adept technology: RoboCourier's new features improve capacity and efficiency Retrieved from Robotics Business Review: https://www.roboticsbusinessreview.com/health-medical/adept_technologys_robocouriers_new_features_improve_capacity_and_efficiency/ 2013, July 30
  5. [40]Demaitre E. Top 50 robotics vol. 7 2017 Retrieved from https://www.roboticsbusinessreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/RBR50_Whitepaper_vFF.pdf
  6. [41]Bryk W. Artificial superintelligence: the coming revolution Retrieved from Harvard Science Review https://harvardsciencereview.com/2015/12/04/artificial-superintelligence-the-coming-revolution-2/ 2015
  7. [42]Meskó B. My health: upgraded: revolutionary technologies to bring a healthier future 2015 Central European University Press
  8. [47]Shishehgar M. Kerr D. Blake J. A systematic review of research into how robotic technology can help older people Smart Health 2018 10.1016/J.SMHL.2018.03.002 · DOI
  9. [58]Alfaro-LeFevre R. Critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment fifth ed. 2011 Saunders Florida

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pepito, J. A., & Locsin, R.
Affiliations
  • University of the Visayas (PH)
  • Florida Atlantic University (US)
Corresponding author
Pepito, Joseph Andrew
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
106-110
ISSN
  • 2096-6296 (ISSN-L)
  • 2352-0132
OpenAlex
W2895614216
Cited by
221
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
FWCI
21.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
nursing practice, automation, humanoid robots, artificial intelligence, future of nursing, nursing education, nursing research, human care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review