Calling in Sick during the Reign of Gongsun Shu
Open accessAbstract
Calling in sick to get out of work is a time-honored practice, and something of an art form in and of itself. Early and medieval Chinese texts are full of instances of individuals claiming illness to either excuse themselves from current positions, or to avoid appointments to office, a practice firmly situated in the rhetoric of reclusion. This paper focuses on several cases contained in Chang Qu's 常璩 (ca. 291-ca. 361) Huayang guo zhi 華陽國志 (Records of the States South of Mount Hua, compiled ca. 350 CE) of men who made medical excuses to reject appointments offered by Gongsun Shu 公孫述 (d. 36 CE), the self-proclaimed emperor of the Shu region. I will examine these anecdotes with an eye toward understanding primarily their historiographical significance. Moreover, this paper is not an effort to compile a comprehensive history of illness and public service, nor a detailed examination of the medical science behind the illnesses used to avoid work; its focus is narrow and specific. How did the persons narrated by Chang Qu use illness to avoid service under a particular ruler, and what underlying messages might we glean from Chang's own telling of these stories?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
Ban Gu's Hanshu has twenty-six occurrences of the same term.
“Ban Gu's 班 固 Hanshu 漢書 contains twenty-six instances of the same term”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Wang Hao and Wang Jia, both from Jiangyuan prefecture in Shu commandery, show a similar pattern.
“We see a similar pattern in the cases of Wang Hao 王皓 and Wang Jia 王嘉, both of Jiangyuan 江原 prefecture in Shu commandery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
After Gongsun Shu took control of the region, he summoned Li Ye to serve as an erudite.
“Later, after Gongsun Shu took control of the region, he also summoned Li Ye to serve as an erudite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Ban Gu's Hanshu does not treat Gongsun Shu in any detail.
“The matter of Gongsun Shu is not treated in any degree of detail in Ban Gu's Hanshu”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Hou Hanshu says Li Ye served as a gentleman at court during the Yuanshi period (1-6 ce), a detail absent from Huayang guo zhi.
“Hou Hanshu notes that Li Ye served as a gentleman at court during the Yuanshi 元始 period (1-6 ce), a detail not mentioned in Huayang guo zhi.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 81.2668-69.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
Li Ye's death is the only case in which Gongsun Shu showed regret for his heavy-handed recruitment.
“Interestingly enough, Li Ye's death is the only instance in which Gongsun Shu demonstrated any regret for the results of his heavy-handed recruitment tactics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Three men refused to serve Gongsun Shu without offering any excuse.
“Three men refused to serve, offering no excuses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The Huayang guo zhi anecdote gives no evidence that Fei Yi had become immune to lacquer poison through prolonged exposure.
“The Huayang guo zhi anecdote offers no evidence that Fei Yi had developed immunity to the lacquer's poison through prolonged exposure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Despite that, Chang Qu, Emperor Guangwu, and later Fan Ye viewed Ren Yong's actions positively.
“Yet his actions were viewed positively by Chang Qu, Emperor Guangwu, and later by Fan Ye.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites HYGZ 10B.583
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites HHS 81.2670
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Two more people, Feng Xin and Ren Yong, offered specific medical excuses to avoid serving Gongsun Shu.
“Two additional persons offered specific medical excuses to avoid serving Gongsun Shu.The cases of Feng Xin 馮信 and Ren Yong 任永 are remarkably similar, and may either be based on a single historical episode or be separate applications of the same rhetorical trope.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There is no record of Gongsun Shu sending envoys to verify medical excuses or apply pressure on these men.
“Again, there is no record of Gongsun Shu sending envoys to either verify the medical excuses or apply pressure on these men.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Fei Yi's claim of insanity was supported by self-injury with toxic lacquer, causing visible burns and skin irritation.
“In the matter of Fei Yi, his claims of insanity were augmented by an act of self-injury: painting his body with toxic lacquer, resulting in visible burns and irritation of the skin (and perhaps other physical symptoms).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Visits to the sick were a role-play: the superior acted as if the illness were real while knowing the claim was probably an excuse.
“Visits to the “sick” took the form of a role-play in which the superior-visitor acted as if the subordinate's illness was real, while knowing full well that the claim was most likely an excuse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The Dongguan Han ji and Huayang guo zhi narratives are the basis for Fan Ye's official biography in Hou Hanshu fascicle 13.
“both the Dongguan Han ji and Huayang guo zhi narratives serve as the basis for Fan Ye's now-official biography in Hou Hanshu fascicle 13.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 13.533-45.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
A survey of these references reveals significant change over time in how medical excuses were used.
“A quick survey of these references shows significant change over time in the deployment of medical excuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In Shiji references to Warring States figures, the illness excuse was used by ruling elites to avoid responsibility and protect themselves from harm.
“References in Shiji to Warring States period personages and events show the excuse being used by members of the ruling elite to shirk responsibility and protect themselves from potential harm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The earliest account of Gongsun Shu's activities survives in fragments of Liu Zhen's Dongguan Han ji.
“Rather, the earliest account of his activities is found in the surviving fragments of Liu Zhen's 劉珍 Dongguan Han ji 東觀漢記.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu Zhen (d.ca.127), Dongguan Han ji
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
It remains unclear whether Li Ye had a real illness, despite Fan Ye's later statement.
“Again, it is unclear whether Li Ye suffered from a real ailment, despite Fan Ye's later claim.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A somewhat different pattern appears when moving from dynastic histories to a local record, especially in accounts of Gongsun Shu's reign.
“Moving from the dynastic histories to a local record, however, we begin to see a somewhat different pattern emerging, especially in accounts of the reign of the regional warlord-emperor Gongsun Shu.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Fei Yi's actions probably produced physical symptoms severe enough to let him avoid work.
“As such, Fei Yi's actions likely caused physical symptoms sufficient to avoid work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Fei Yi had not acquired immunity to lacquer poison through prolonged exposure.
- Interpretationreasoning
Fei Yi's drastic actions made his illness claim not merely believable but real.
“Thus, Fei Yi's drastic actions make his claim of illness not only believable, but real.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The fact that further summonses were sent suggests provincial and commandery officials doubted Li Ye was truly ill.
“That additional calls to serve were tendered would seem to indicate that the provincial and commandery officials were unconvinced that Li Ye was suffering from an actual illness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Feigning insanity to avoid political service had canonical and historical precedents.
“Pleading insanity to avoid political service had canonical and historical foundations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Chang Qu's account is the second-earliest surviving record of Gongsun Shu.
“Chang Qu's account marks the second-earliest extant record of Gongsun Shu”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The rhetorical messages of the Huayang guo zhi and Hou Hanshu accounts of Li Ye differ considerably.
“In this regard, the rhetorical messages of the Huayang guo zhi and Hou Hanshu accounts are quite different.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Zhanguo ce and Shiji both say that after failing to kill Viscount Xiang of Zhao to avenge Earl Zhi, Yu Rang lacquered his body to cause sores.
“Both the Zhanguo ce 戰國策 and Shiji accounts of Yu Rang note that after failing in his initial attempt to kill Viscount Xiang of Zhao 趙襄子 to avenge the death of his former patron Earl Zhi 知伯, Yu Rang “lacquered his body in order to cause sores” 漆身為厲.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zhanguo ce
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Shiji
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
They also show that for a number of men, death was preferable to service in Gongsun Shu's administration.
“Moreover, they show that for a number of men, death was preferable to service in Gongsun Shu's administration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Huayang guo zhi biography of Fei Yi strongly echoes Fan Sui's account of the Viscount of Ji and Jie Yu in both self-mutilation and feigned madness.
“The Huayang guo zhi biography of Fei Yi strongly echoes Fan Sui's account of the Viscount of Ji and Jie Yu in both their selfmutilation and feigned madness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Fei Yi's claims should be understood similarly, as part of the rhetoric of reclusion.
“Fei Yi's claims should be seen in a similar manner, and as part of this rhetoric of reclusion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The gradual onset of qingmang could allow someone with no prior eye ailment or obvious injury to plead blindness to avoid duty.
“Moreover, the gradual onset of qing mang could allow an individual with no prior ophthalmological ailments or obvious injury to the eye plead blindness to avoid duty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In Han and Tang descriptions, qingmang's key feature is that the eyes and pupils appear completely normal.
“The most significant aspect of the Han and Tang descriptions of qingmang is that the eyes, and in particular, the pupils, appear completely normal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The extraordinary lengths Feng Xin and Ren Yong went to maintain their blindness claims earned the respect of contemporaries and later historians.
“It appears to have been the extraordinary lengths that Feng Xin and Ren Yong went to in order to maintain their claims of blindness that garnered the respect of their contemporaries and later historians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The stories of these men are analogous to the female chastity stories in Huayang guo zhi.
“The stories of these men are analogous to the female chastity stories of Huayang guo zhi.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Qingmang was the perfect excuse, provided the individuals could act the part of their claimed condition.
“In short, qingmang was the perfect excuse, provided the individuals were able to act the part of their newly claimed condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The worthies who rejected Gongsun Shu through self-mutilation, suicide, attempted suicide, and deception similarly embody loyalty by refusing to serve an illegitimate ruler.
“The worthies who rejected Gongsun Shu by acts of self-mutilation (Fei Yi), suicide (Wang Hao, Wang Jia, and Li Ye), attempted suicide (Qiao Xuan), and deception (Ren Yong and Feng Xin) similarly embody loyalty by refusing to serve an illegitimate, ruler.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Shiji says Wei Xuancheng, second son of Wei Xian, feigned madness to avoid investiture as marquis.
“Finally, Shiji also notes that the second son of Wei Xian 韋 賢, Wei Xuancheng 韋玄成, “feigned madness” in order to avoid investiture as marquis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shiji
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The episodes of sexual indiscretion by Feng Xin's maid and Ren Yong's wife are rhetorical tropes rather than historical incidents.
“As such, we ought to take these narrative details as rhetorical tropes rather than historical incidents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The sexual activities of Feng Xin's maid and Ren Yong's wife would have been detectable by a sighted person.
- Interpretationcitation
If Ren Yong was faking blindness and did not act to save his son from the well, Han classicist standards would regard him as inhumane.
“If Ren Yong was faking blindness and failed to act to save his son from the well, he would be regarded as inhumane (and inhuman) by Han classicist standards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mengzi 2A6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In all these cases, individuals used what Laurence Schneider calls 'tactical madness' to avoid various kinds of public service.
“In all of these cases these individuals employed what Laurence Schneider has called “tactical madness” 44 to avoid various forms of public service.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Laurence Schneider
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Belief in a simple cure for an ailment with no external symptoms provided a tidy resolution for men claiming qingmang.
“Again, the belief in such a simple cure for an ailment with no external symptoms provided a tidy resolution for the men claiming to be afflicted with qingmang.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Wang Tao contradicted Chao Yuanfang by identifying qingmang as a cataract with visible symptoms.
“Wang Tao's 王濤 (ca.670-755) Waitai miyao 外台秘要 contradicts Chao Yuanfang, identifying qingmang as a cataract-an ailment with visible symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang Tao, Waitai miyao
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 41
- May combine two claims. 58
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationFan Ye adds that the envoy accepted the bribe, Qiao Xuan fled and hid in the wilds, and later died, apparently naturally, in 36 ce.
“Fan Ye expands this account to note that the envoy accepted the bribe and Qiao Xuan fled and hid himself in the wilds, later dying, apparently of natural causes, in 36 ce.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 81.2667-68.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAfter Gongsun Shu's death, the restored Han court honored and recruited local worthies: the dead received posthumous honors, and those who had fled were rewarded and offered appointments.
“Following this narrative, Chang Qu shifts his attention to the newly restored Han court's efforts to honor and recruit local worthies of the southwest after the death of Gongsun Shu.Posthumous honors were bestowed upon those who lost their lives during Gongsun's reign, and those who had fled were rewarded and offered official appointments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWhile the three men above refused without excuses, four others claimed illness to avoid serving Gongsun Shu.
“While the three individuals discussed above offered no excuses for their refusals, four others claimed illness to avoid service in Gongsun Shu's administration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationChang Qu concludes that the western lands were at peace and everyone was delighted.
“Chang Qu concludes, “because of this, the western lands were at peace, and there were none who were not like ducks among pondweed [i.e., delighted]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HYGZ 5.337.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHou Hanshu reports that when Wang Mang acted as regent, Li Ye left office because of illness, closed his gate, and ignored summonses from province and commandery.
“Additionally, Hou Hanshu reports that “when Wang Mang acted as regent, Li Ye left office due to illness, closed his gate, and did not respond to the summonses from the province or commandery””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 81.2669.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationFan Ye adds dialogue to the Wang Hao and Wang Jia accounts, but the basic plot is unchanged.
“Fan Ye adds additional dialogue to his account of Wang Hao and Wang Jia, but the basic plot remained unchanged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 81.2670.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFascicles 5-9 of the Huayang guo zhi cover several separatist regimes in southwest China, including Gongsun Shu's Dacheng, the Liu Yan and Liu Zhang administrations, Liu Bei and Liu Shan's Shu Han, and the Li family's Cheng-Han.
“Fascicles 5-9 of Chang Qu's Huayang guo zhi present the histories of various separatist regimes in southwest China, including Gongsun Shu's state of Dacheng 大成 (25-36 ce), the administration of Liu Yan 劉焉 (d.194) and his son Liu Zhang 劉璋 (d.219), Liu Bei 劉備 and Liu Shan's 劉禪 state of [Shu] Han 蜀漢 (221-264), and the Li family's state of Cheng-Han 成漢 (302-352).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenQiao Xuan served Emperors Cheng and Ai as grandee remonstrant and consultant, left office and returned to Ba after Wang Mang took the throne, and later refused a summons from Gongsun Shu.
“Qiao Xuan 譙玄, appellative Junhuang 君黃, served Emperors Cheng 成 (r.33-6 bce) and Ai 哀 (r.6 bce-1 ce) as grandee remonstrant and consultant (jianyi daifu 諫議大夫), but left office and returned to Ba after Wang Mang took the throne.Later, he refused a summons from Gongsun Shu.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationLi Ye of Zitong prefecture in Guanghan commandery held to pure ambitions from youth and declined office.
“In the first of these cases, Li Ye 李業, appellative Juyou 巨遊, of Zitong 梓潼 prefecture in Guanghan 廣漢 commandery, “as a youth, held to his pure ambitions” 少執志清白, 28 that is, declined to take office.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationChang Qu's early Li Ye account does not mention illness; it only says he held firm to his pure intent and never accepted public office.
“Chang Qu's early account of Li Ye makes no mention of illness, only that he held firm to his pure intent and never accepted public office.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationHou Hanshu closely follows Huayang guo zhi, omits the popular song, and adds that after feigning madness Fei Yi fled to a remote mountain for more than ten years.
“The Hou Hanshu account follows closely that of Huayang guo zhi, omitting the popular song and adding a brief comment that after feigning madness, Fei Yi “fled to a remote mountain for over ten years” 退藏山藪十餘年.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 81.2670.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationChen Shou's Sanguo zhi mentions three people 'claiming illness' and one 'pleading illness'.
“Chen Shou's 陳壽 Sanguo zhi 三國志 only makes mention of three persons “claiming illness” and one person “pleading illness.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAfter declaring himself emperor of Dacheng, Gongsun Shu summoned several local scholars to serve in his administration.
“After proclaiming himself emperor of Dacheng, Gongsun Shu summoned a number of local scholars to serve in his administration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationWang Hao served as prefect of Meiyang, left his post and returned to Shu when Wang Mang took the throne; later Gongsun Shu sent an envoy to appoint him, Wang Hao slit his throat and had his head presented to the envoy, and Gongsun Shu, ashamed and angry, executed Wang Hao's wife and son.
“Wang Hao, appellative Zili 子離, served as prefect of Meiyang 美陽, 24 but left his post and returned to Shu when Wang Mang took the throne.Later, Gongsun Shu sent an envoy to appoint Wang Hao to office.Wang Hao thereupon slit his own throat and had his head presented to the envoy.Gongsun Shu was “ashamed and angry, so he executed [Wang Hao's] wife and son””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HYGZ 10A.538.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHou Hanshu says Li Ye was chronically ill and did not get up.
“The Hou Hanshu account says, “Li Ye was chronically ill and did not get up” 業固疾不起.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 81.2669.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenSima Qian's Shiji has thirty-eight occurrences of the term 'claiming illness' (cheng bing).
“Sima Qian's (c.145-86 bce) 司馬遷 Shiji 史記 contains thirty-eight mentions of persons “claiming illness” (cheng bing 稱病)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationGrand administrator Liu Xian admired Li Ye and appointed him to the bureau of merit ten times, but Li Ye did not report; Liu Xian grew angry and wanted to kill him; Li Ye turned himself in at the jail, and Liu Xian released him.
“The grand administrator Liu Xian admired his reputation and appointed him to serve in the bureau of merit ten times, but Li Ye did not report.Liu Xian became angry and wanted to kill him.Li Ye turned himself in at the jail.Liu Xian released him.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAngered by Qiao Xuan's refusal, Gongsun Shu sent an envoy with poisoned alcohol to fetch him; Qiao Xuan laughed at the envoy and took the poison, and his son Qiao Ying offered eight million cash for a pardon.
“Angered by Qiao's refusal, Gongsun Shu dispatched an envoy bearing poisoned alcohol to fetch the reluctant scholar.Qiao reportedly laughed at the envoy and received the poison, upon which Qiao Xuan's son, Qiao Ying 譙瑛, kowtowed and offered the envoy eight million cash to obtain a pardon for his father.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe illnesses in these accounts are often vague, and powerful figures being avoided frequently did not directly challenge the excuses.
“The illnesses cited are frequently vague, and in many cases, the powerful figures being avoided did not directly challenge the excuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFan Ye's Hou Hanshu has twenty-eight references to 'claiming illness' and twelve to 'pleading illness' (tuo bing).
“Fan Ye's 范曄 Hou Hanshu 後漢書 contains twenty-eight references to “claiming illness” and an additional twelve to “pleading illness” (tuo bing 託病).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationFor worthies who simply refused to report, Gongsun Shu applied pressure, forcing Wang Hao and Wang Jia to commit suicide and attempting to do the same to Qiao Xuan.
“For those who simply snubbed Gongsun Shu by refusing to report to duty, the ruler applied pressure, forcing Wang Hao and Wang Jia to commit suicide, and Gongsun Shu attempted to do the same to Qiao Xuan.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 81.2670
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRen Yong, like Feng Xin, claimed a specific type of blindness and ignored dramatic events in his presence.
“Like Feng Xin, he reported suffering from a particular type of blindness.Additionally, he was also able to ignore dramatic events that were said to have taken place in his presence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HYGZ 10B.583
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth Feng Xin and Ren Yong claimed to suffer from qingmang, or green-blindness.
“Both claimed to suffer from qingmang 青盲, or green-blindness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationChang Qu does not mention Feng Xin recovering eyesight or recanting blindness, and ends with him remaining in lifelong reclusion.
“Chang Qu makes no mention of Feng Xin ever recovering his eyesight or recanting his claim of blindness, but rather concludes with Feng Xin maintaining his lifelong reclusion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HYGZ 10B.564
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationChang Qu's account of Gongsun Shu's rise and fall echoes Dongguan Han ji and supplements it with a summary of efforts to commemorate, reward, and recruit the worthies of Shu after Gongsun Shu's demise.
“It echoes the main events found in Dongguan Han ji, and supplements that record with a summary of efforts to commemorate, reward, and recruit the worthies of Shu after Gongsun Shu's demise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dongguan Han ji
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationLi Ye's claims of unspecified illness also led to pressure from Gongsun Shu and another suicide.
“Even Li Ye's claims of some unspecified illness resulted in pressure from Gongsun Shu, leading to another suicide.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 81.2668-70
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenChang Qu places the Feng Xin and Ren Yong cases in fascicle 10B but not consecutively, while Fan Ye treats them together in one anecdote.
“Chang Qu presents both cases in fascicle 10B, but not consecutively; Fan Ye treats them together in a single anecdote.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe cure for Ren Yong and Feng Xin's green-blindness was simply washing their eyes, though the Hou Hanshu gives no specific date for the bathing.
“Perhaps not coincidentally, the cure for Ren Yong and Feng Xin's green-blindness was simply washing their eyes, though no specific date of the bathing was given in the Hou Hanshu account.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 81.2670
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe popular song in Huayang guo zhi says Fei Fengjun did not serve in a chaotic age and did not shun a bad reputation.
“The popular song recorded in the Huayang guo zhi account quoted above says, “Fei Fengjun / Did not serve in a chaotic age, / Did not shun a bad reputation.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationFeng Xin declined numerous local and regional appointments before Gongsun Shu took power.
“The commandery thrice recommended him as filially pious and incorruptible, the province recommended him as a flourishing talent, the court appointed him ten times, and official carriages repeatedly came to fetch him, but he declined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HYGZ 10B.564
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationFan Ye's account largely echoes Huayang guo zhi but adds washing as the cure and notes the suicide of Feng Xin's maidservant, paralleling Ren Yong's wife.
“The account largely echoes those of the Huayang guo zhi with two notable exceptions: first, the manner in which their blindness was cured.Here, Fan Ye adds the element of washing to effect the cure.Second, Fan Ye notes the suicide of Feng Xin's maidservant, paralleling that of Ren Yong's wife.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HHS 81.2670
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCash appears in Li Ye's case too, but there it compensated his family for his death, unlike Qiao Ying ransoming his father Qiao Xuan from forced suicide.
“We also see the exchange of cash, though in the case of Li Ye, payment was offered to the family to compensate for Li Ye's death (as opposed to Qiao Ying ransoming his father, Qiao Xuan, from forced suicide).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough lacquer exposure could have caused stupor and brain damage, Fei Yi's madness claims should not be accepted at face value.
“While Fei Yi's exposure to the lacquer could have actually caused “stupor” and “brain damage,” his claims to madness should not be taken at face value.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningChang Qu's account generally follows the earlier Dongguan Han ji outline, but each narrative contains details absent from the other, which supports Chang Qu's aim of supplementing earlier historical accounts of the southwest.
“In general, Chang Qu's account follows the outline of the earlier Dongguan Han ji account; however, the Huayang guo zhi and Dongguan Han ji narratives contain details not included in the other, supporting Chang Qu's intent of supplementing previous historical accounts of the affairs of the southwest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA considerable number of these visits ended in near-miraculous cures that let the official return to duty.
“Not a small number of these visits resulted in near miraculous cures, allowing the “sick” official to return to duty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIt is unclear what additional sources Fan Ye used to add details missing from Chang Qu's earlier account.
“It is unclear what additional sources Fan Ye may have consulted in order to add the details missing from Chang Qu's earlier account.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPei Yin's Shijie jijie and Sima Zhen's Shiji suoyin gloss li as lai.
“Both Pei Yin's 裴駰 (fl.438) Shijie jijie 史記集解 and Sima Zhen's 司馬貞 (ca.656-720) Shiji suoyin 記索隱 gloss li 厲 as lai 賴.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shijie jijie
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Shiji suoyin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenEarly and medieval Chinese texts contain many cases of people using illness claims to leave posts or avoid appointments, a practice tied to reclusion rhetoric.
“Early and medieval Chinese texts are full of instances of individuals claiming illness to either excuse themselves from current positions, or to avoid appointments to office, a practice firmly situated in the rhetoric of reclusion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLi Jianmin's study finds that Han officials commonly used illness claims as socially acceptable ways to navigate unequal power relations, often to escape work or express dissatisfaction.
“He notes that claims to illness were common during the Han because they were socially acceptable methods for officials to navigate unequal social power relationships, often allowing the less powerful figures to get what they wanted (usually, out of a work assignment) or express dissatisfaction with the status quo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li Jianmin, “Han dai ‘yibing’ yanjiu,”
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe next case shows a more specific illness claim and the lengths taken to make that claim convincing.
“The next case illustrates not only a more specific claim to illness, but the lengths one might go to in order to make that claim convincing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe two historians' narratives differ on Li Ye's early life and converge only on his rejection of Gongsun Shu's appointment.
“The two historians' narratives diverge in the details of Li Ye's early life, and only come together again in the matter of his rejection of Gongsun Shu's appointment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSending poison to Qiao Xuan and detaining Wang Jia's family indicate that Gongsun Shu knew how his summonses would be received and was desperate to secure these men's service.
“The dispatch of an envoy with poison to appoint Qiao Xuan and the preemptive detainment of the wife and son of Wang Jia would seem to indicate that Gongsun Shu was already aware of how his calls to serve would be received by the local worthies, as well as hints at his desperation to secure the services of these men.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMany examples show state representatives, including emperors, visiting the supposedly sick official with food, medicine, supplies, and sometimes a physician.
“Numerous examples show a representative of the state, including the emperor himself, calling on the “sick” official (wenbing 問病), often with food, medicine, supplies, and even an attending physician to aid in the recovery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSima Zhen explains that lai is a severe ulcer; lacquer is toxic and contact causes ulcers and swelling resembling leprosy, so Yu Rang painted himself with lacquer to appear leprous.
“As for lai, it is a severe ulcer.Lacquer is toxic and contact with it causes ulcers and swelling, and it resembles leprosy.Therefore, Yu Rang painted his body with lacquer to cause himself to look as if he had leprosy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shiji suoyin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLi Ye's case strongly resembles those of Qiao Xuan, Wang Hao, and Wang Jia: Gongsun Shu coerced men into service, often leading to suicide as refusal.
“Here, we see striking similarities to the cases of Qiao Xuan, Wang Hao, and Wang Jia, in that Gongsun Shu was willing to coerce individuals into public service, often resulting in rejection by suicide.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLunyu 18 mentions two early worthies, the Viscount of Ji and Jie Yu, who claimed madness to avoid service; later sources say they let down their hair, feigned madness, and refused to serve.
“For example, in Lunyu 18 we find mention of two early worthies who claimed madness to avoid service: the Viscount of Ji 箕 子 and Jie Yu 接輿, both of whom are mentioned in later sources as having let down their hair, feigned madness, and refused to serve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lunyu 18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningRegardless of historical accuracy, these accounts reflect poorly on Gongsun Shu from a historiographical perspective.
“Whether or not these accounts are historically accurate, from a historiographical perspective, they do not reflect well upon Gongsun Shu.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe cases of Qiao Xuan, Wang Hao, and Wang Jia suggest that Gongsun Shu wanted noted recluses in his service as a sign of sage rule, but did not care how they were obtained.
“From the cases of Qiao Xuan, Wang Hao, and Wang Jia, it seems that while Gongsun Shu was interested in bringing noted recluses into his service-a sign of a sage ruler-he was not so concerned with how these worthies were obtained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningChang Qu portrays Li Ye as a lifelong recluse, while Fan Ye places him among officials who left Han court posts to protest Wang Mang's seizure of power.
“Chang Qu presents Li Ye as a lifelong recluse; while Fan Ye adds Li Ye to the list of officials who left posts at the Han court to protest Wang Mang's seizure of power.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFor illness claims to succeed, confirmation of illness was generally needed.
“For these claims to work, however, a confirmation of illness was generally required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningFei Yi's actions recall the famed assassin Yu Rang.
“Fei Yi's actions immediately bring to mind the case of the famed assassin Yu Rang 豫 讓.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIt is unclear whether Li Ye was actually ill, although he had himself carried on his sickbed to meet an envoy with an official summons.
“It is unclear in this instance whether Li Ye was actually ill, though he had himself carried to the door on his sickbed to meet an envoy bearing an official summons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGongsun Shu did not believe Li Ye's illness claim and was willing to force him into service whether or not he was ill.
“The facts of the matter, however, are ultimately irrelevant: Gongsun Shu did not believe the claim and was willing to force the worthy into service, ill or not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premiseown dataChang Qu stated that his aim in these fascicles was to integrate local historical records into broader official accounts, giving local perspectives on imperial matters concerning his home region.
“Chang Qu's self-stated intent in these fascicles was to incorporate local historical records into the broader official accounts of the area, thus providing local perspectives on imperial issues involving his home region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLi notes that illness was often used to display humility and could help one obtain a higher, more prestigious appointment.
“Finally, Li notes that illness was often deployed as a show of humility, and could be used to launch oneself to a higher, more prestigious appointment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li Jianmin, “Han dai ‘yibing’ yanjiu,”
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIn these anecdotes, Chang Qu establishes gendered categories of virtuous conduct: loyalty for men and chastity for women.
“In these anecdotes, Chang Qu establishes gendered categories of virtuous conduct: loyalty for men and chastity for women.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe earliest efforts to distinguish types of blindness appear in several Tang dynasty texts.
“The earliest efforts to distinguish between various types of blindness can be seen in several Tang dynasty texts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn Shiji, Fan Sui tells the King of Qin that the Viscount of Ji and Jie Yu lacquered their bodies to form sores as if leprous and let their hair down as if mad, without benefiting their lords.
“Moreover, in the Shiji account of Fan Sui 范 睢, Fan tells the King of Qin, “the Viscount of Ji and Jie Yu lacquered their bodies [to form sores] as if leprous and let their hair down as if mad, but without any benefit to their lords” 箕子、接輿 漆身為厲,被髮為狂,無益於主.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shiji
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenChang Qu presents the men and women of Shu as the utmost virtuous, even in times of political independence.
“As such, Chang Qu presents the men and women of the Shu region as the utmost virtuous, even in times of political independence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningChang Qu's depiction of the recruitment of Shu worthies to Gongsun Shu's administration serves to paint Gongsun Shu in a most unfavorable light.
“Chang Qu's depiction of recruitment of the worthies of Shu to Gongsun Shu's administration, presented in the later biographical fascicles of Huayang guo zhi, however, serves to paint Gongsun Shu in a most unfavorable light.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationFei Yi survived his efforts to appear unfit for duty; both Huayang guo zhi and Hou Hanshu say he returned from hiding after Gongsun Shu's death and took office under the restored Han with his body intact and reputation enhanced.
“At any rate, Fei Yi is fortunate to have survived his efforts to make himself appear unfit for duty, and as both Huayang guo zhi and Hou Hanshu note, he returned from hiding after the death of Gongsun Shu and took office under the restored Han, his body intact and reputation enhanced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenChang Qu's intent for the middle fascicles of Huayang guo zhi was to use local sources to add local perspectives to national history.
“As noted earlier, Chang Qu's intent for the middle fascicles of Huayang guo zhi was to apply local sources in order to add local perspectives to national history.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKong Yingda equated Zheng Xuan's category of meng (pupils but no sight) with qingmang.
“Kong Yingda equates Zheng Xuan's category of meng (pupils but no sight) with the term qingmang.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mao shi zhushu
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationcitationRen Yong claimed blindness during Wang Mang's time, before Gongsun Shu, and continued the ruse throughout Gongsun Shu's regime.
“In this case, Ren Yong's claims of blindness predated the Gongsun Shu regime, but his ruse continued throughout it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HYGZ 10B.583
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn common usage, qingmang referred to a variety of ailments, including cataracts, glaucoma, and color blindness.
“In common usage, the term qingmang seems to refer to a variety of different ailments, including cataracts, glaucoma, and color blindness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kovacs and Unschuld, Essential Subtleties
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe Feng Xin and Ren Yong cases are very similar and may derive from one historical episode or from separate uses of the same rhetorical trope.
“The cases of Feng Xin 馮信 and Ren Yong 任永 are remarkably similar, and may either be based on a single historical episode or be separate applications of the same rhetorical trope.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause qingmang had no external symptoms, Feng Xin and Ren Yong could claim a form of blindness that was believable and could not be disproved by medical examination.
“As such, Feng Xin and Ren Yong were able to claim a form of blindness with no external symptoms, making their claims both believable and unimpeachable by medical examination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenTaken at face value, the anecdotes illustrate Gongsun Shu's strong desire to recruit worthies and his lack of scruples about how talents were obtained.
“Taken at face value, these anecdotes illustrate Gongsun Shu's strong desire to recruit worthies into the service of his regime, as well as his lack of scruples about how these talents were obtained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf their accounts are read as two men dutifully maintaining claims of medical ailments to avoid serving an immoral and illegitimate ruler, then Ren and Feng join the ranks of worthy men and reinforce Chang Qu's main objective: depicting Shu as a cradle of loyal and worthy, chaste and filial men and women.
“If we read their accounts as two men dutifully maintaining claims of medical ailments in order to avoid serving an immoral and illegitimate ruler, then Ren and Feng take their places among the ranks of the worthy men of past and present ages, further reinforcing Chang Qu's main objective: depicting Shu as a cradle of loyal and worthy, chaste and filial men and women.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenRen Yong's recovery of eyesight is presented as miraculous and linked to Han correlative cosmology: when political order was restored, the natural world, including his eyes, was restored.
“Ren Yong's recovery of his eyesight is presented in a miraculous manner, linked to the Han notions of correlative cosmology.Once the affairs in the political world had been restored to normal, the natural world, including Ren Yong's eyes, was also restored to normal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn Huayang guo zhi's female chastity accounts, women define chastity as loyalty to one husband, a view ahead of the general curve in traditional China.
“In all of these accounts, the women define female chastity as loyalty to one husband-a view that was ahead of the general curve for such views in traditional China.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Farmer, 'Chastity, Suicide, Art, and History'
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningMaintaining the ruse in the face of family tragedy and betrayal required emotional sacrifices.
“however, the need to maintain the ruse in the face of family tragedy and betrayal required emotional sacrifices in order to see through to the end.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIf Gongsun Shu had sent an envoy to pressure Fei Yi, the envoy would have seen a clearly injured and unpresentable man.
“Had Gongsun Shu sent an envoy to pressure Fei Yi (and there is no textual claim that he did), the ruler's agent would have seen a man clearly injured and unpresentable at court.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningChang Qu presents the Shu region as a home to loyal and moral gentlemen willing to suffer rather than serve a usurping ruler.
“Taken as a whole, Chang Qu offers a view of the Shu region as a home to loyal and moral gentlemen, willing to suffer rather than serve a usurping ruler.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough some did not commit suicide, they are depicted as having suffered physically or emotionally for their resolve.
“Although some did not commit suicide, they are depicted as also having suffered, either physically or emotionally, for their resolve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningGiven the formulaic nature of the anecdotes, we should be somewhat skeptical of their details.
“While not completely rejecting the possible historicity of these anecdotes, given their formulaic nature we should be somewhat skeptical of the details of these matters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAfter Gongsun Shu took over, Feng Xin declined further summonses by claiming blindness, though Chang Qu does not state this explicitly.
“Afterward, though not explicitly stated in Chang Qu's narrative, he declined additional summonses from Gongsun Shu by claiming to be blind.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites HYGZ 10B.564
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFor Gongsun Shu, vague excuses were taken as falsehoods, while claims of specific medical ailments were accepted.
“For Gongsun Shu, vague excuses appear to have been taken as falsehoods, while claims of specific medical ailments were accepted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningChang Qu paints Gongsun Shu as one of, if not the, worst rulers of the Shu region.
“In contrast, Chang Qu paints Gongsun Shu as one of, if not the, worst ruler of the Shu region.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningVague or no excuses were insufficient to persuade Gongsun Shu to let worthies remain out of office; only specific medical ailments as excuses allowed summoned individuals to decline.
“In these cases, no excuses or vague excuses were insufficient to sway the ruler into permitting the worthies to remain out of office.Only with the deployment of specific medical ailments as excuses were the summoned individuals allowed to decline appointments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIf Ren Yong and Feng Xin lost sight when Gongsun Shu illegitimately claimed the throne and regained it after his death, their afflictions and cure were manifestations of Heaven's will.
“If these two men lost their sight when Gongsun Shu illegitimately claimed the throne and mysteriously regained it after his death, then their afflictions and cure were manifestations of the will of Heaven itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEarly and medieval texts mention two cures for qingmang: ram horn and bathing on the eighth day of the first month.
“Two cures for qingmang are mentioned in early and medieval texts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites HHS 86.2858
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Chao Yuanfang, Zhubing yuanhou lun
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese acts speak to Gongsun Shu's lack of character, as does the fact that many individuals chose death rather than serve in his illegitimate administration.
“These acts speak to Gongsun Shu's lack of character, as does the fact that many of these individuals chose death rather than serve in his illegitimate administration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Fei Yi had not acquired immunity to lacquer poison through prolonged exposure.
“The Huayang guo zhi anecdote offers no evidence that Fei Yi had developed immunity to the lacquer's poison through prolonged exposure.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sexual activities of Feng Xin's maid and Ren Yong's wife would have been detectable by a sighted person.
“There is no mention in the anecdotes of Ren or Feng losing other senses-hearing, for instance-thereby making the women's activities both brazen and detectable.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The citation for Li Ye changes fascicle
MinorThe same Huayang guo zhi page is cited for Li Ye as fascicle 10C in the earlier note but as fascicle 10B in the later note.
“33.HYGZ 10C.611.”
“61.HHS 81.2668-70; HYGZ 10B.611.”
The proposed timing of Ren Yong's blindness conflicts with his account
MinorThe conclusion considers both men losing their sight when Gongsun Shu claimed the throne. Ren Yong's account instead places his claim of blindness during Wang Mang's time, and the paper explicitly says it predated Gongsun Shu's regime.
“If these two men lost their sight when Gongsun Shu illegitimately claimed the throne and mysteriously regained it after his death”
“In this case, Ren Yong's claims of blindness predated the Gongsun Shu regime, but his ruse continued throughout it.”
Cites
Artisans in early imperial China
Yew, D. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-5374 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Farmer, J. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Farmer, J. Michael
- ORCID
- Farmer, J. Michael
- Venue
- Journal of the American Oriental Society
- Publisher
- American Oriental Society
- Published
- 2021-09-19
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-2289
- OpenAlex
- W3019847919
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- reclusion, medical rhetoric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-04.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-04.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review