CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 429Literacy, Media, and EducationDigital Education and SocietyDigital Media and Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital Rights, Digital Citizenship and Digital Literacy: What’s the Difference?

Open access
Pangrazio, Luci, Sefton-Green, Julian·2021·Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research
DOI 10.7821/naer.2021.1.616
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Using digital media is complicated. Invasions of privacy, increasing dataveillance, digital-by-default commercial and civic transactions and the erosion of the democratic sphere are just some of the complex issues in modern societies. Existential questions associated with digital life challenge the individual to come to terms with who they are, as well as their social interactions and realities. In this article, we identify three contemporary normative responses to these complex issues –digital citizenship, digital rights and digital literacy. These three terms capture epistemological and ontological frames that theorise and enact (both in policy and everyday social interactions) how individuals learn to live in digitally mediated societies. The article explores the effectiveness of each in addressing the philosophical, ethical and practical issues raised by datafication, and the limitations of human agency as an overarching goal within these responses. We examine how each response addresses challenges in policy, everyday social life and political rhetoric, tracing the fluctuating uses of these terms and their address to different stakeholders. The article concludes with a series of conceptual and practical ‘action points’ that might optimise these responses to the benefit of the individual and society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7821/naer.2021.1.616

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Diagram showing the broad field of action for Digital Citizenship, Digital Rights and Digital Literacy
Figure 1 Diagram showing the broad field of action for Digital Citizenship, Digital Rights and Digital LiteracyCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Jenkins, H., Shresthova, S., & Gamber-Thompson, L. (2016). By Any Media Necessary: The New Youth Activism (Connected Youth and Digital Futures). NYU Press.
  2. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Social Learning (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
  3. Ozalp, S. (2019). Unlawful data access and abuse of metadata for mass persecution of dissidents in Turkey: The by-lock case. In A. Daly, S. K. Devitt, & M. Mann (Eds.), Good Data (pp. 117–134). Institute of Network Cultures.
  4. Sarre, R. (2015). Metadata retention: A review of policy implications for Australians. Justice and Social Democracy Conference.

Cited by

Items 301–400 of 429

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
15-27
ISSN
2254-7339 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.7821/naer.2021.1.616
OpenAlex
W3118612437
Cited by
284
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 22
FWCI
375.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (University of Alicante) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spain (EDU2015-70491-R)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital Education and Society
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
digital rights, digital citizenship, digital literacy, datafication, dataveillance, human agency, digital privacy, digital policy, digital media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review