NEWSDIG: The National Early Warning Score Development and Implementation Group
Open accessAbstract
The National Early Warning Score Development and Implementation Group (NEWSDIG) was a group convened by the Royal College of Physicians to develop a new early warning score (EWS) system that would be validated, easily learnt and used, and widely implemented. The Acute Medicine Task Force[1][1] that
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lab values are often not considered in early warning scores.
“Lab values are often not considered in early warning scores [46]”
From Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 4 · Cited by 131
- Authors
- Jones, M.
- Affiliations
- Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Mike
- Venue
- Clinical Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 501-503
- ISSN
- 1470-2118 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5922584
- OpenAlex
- W2146261097
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Keywords
- early warning scores, clinical risk assessment, early detection of deterioration, clinical implementation
- MeSH terms
- United Kingdom, Health Status Indicators, Humans, State Medicine, Advisory Committees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
